| Literature DB >> 32821537 |
Shijia Li1,2,3, Min Zhuo1,3, Xia Huang1,3, Yuanyuan Huang4,3, Jing Zhou2,3, Dongsheng Xiong2,3, Jiahui Li2,3, Ya Liu2,3, Zhilin Pan2,3, Hehua Li4,3, Jun Chen5, Xiaobo Li3,6, Zhiming Xiang5,7, Fengchun Wu4,3, Kai Wu2,4,3,5,8,9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The gut microbiome and microbiome-gut-brain (MGB) axis have been receiving increasing attention for their role in the regulation of mental behavior and possible biological basis of psychiatric disorders. With the advance of next-generation sequencing technology, characterization of the gut microbiota in schizophrenia (SZ) patients can provide rich clues for the diagnosis and prevention of SZ.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA sequencing; Gut microbiota; Microbiome-Gut-Brain axis; PANSS; Schizophrenia
Year: 2020 PMID: 32821537 PMCID: PMC7395597 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9574
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Demographic characteristic of schizophrenia and normal controls.
Values are shown as mean ± SD or ratio.
| Characteristic | NC group ( | SZ group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 41.03 ± 14.34 | 42.15 ± 13.13 | 0.60 |
| Sex (M/F) | 39/41 | 46/36 | 0.35 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.03 ± 3.05 | 24.48 ± 4.33 | 0.01 |
| PANSS | – | 59.12 ± 18.18 | – |
| Education year | 13.95 ± 3.49 | 11.22 ± 3.51 | 2.04 × 10−6 |
| S-HDL-C (mmol/l) | 1.65 ± 0.29 | 1.40 ± 0.50 | 1.43 × 10−4 |
| S-LDL-C (mmol/l) | 3.62 ± 0.95 | 2.97 ± 0.84 | 7.95 × 10−6 |
| S-Glu (mmol/l) | 5.77 ± 1.15 | 4.83 ± 1.04 | 1.38 × 10−8 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 6.24 ± 1.19 | 4.76 ± 0.94 | 4.59 × 10−15 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.26 ± 0.69 | 1.56 ± 0.83 | 0.01 |
| Tobacco intake (%) | 5 | 20.7 | 0.01 |
| Alcohol intake (%) | 37.5 | 3.7 | 3.36 × 10−8 |
Notes:
Eight NCs and 10 SZ patients lacked BMI information.
BMI, body mass index; S-HDL-C, serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; S-LDL-C, serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; S-Glu, serum glucose; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.
Figure 1Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plot illustrating beta-diversity distance matrices of Bray-Curtis distance comparing sample distributions between the SZ and NC groups.
Red dots and green triangles represent NCs and SZ patients, respectively.
Figure 2Microbial composition at phylum and genus levels.
(A and B) indicate the most abundant genera and phyla in the NC and SZ groups, respectively. Bacteria that were significantly different between the two groups are shown in (A and B) (p < 0.05, FDR correction, “↑” represent higher in SZs and “↓” represent lower, respectively).
Figure 3The differently abundant taxa identified using LEfSe analysis.
(A) LEfSe cladogram showed the most differentially abundant taxa between the two groups. Taxa enriched for NC in red; SZ enriched taxa in green. The size of each dot is proportional to its effect size. (B) Visualization of only taxa meeting an LDA threshold >2. Taxa with enriched levels in SZs are shown in green, red represented taxa with enriched levels in NCs.
Figure 4Functional prediction analysis of two groups using PICRUSt.
In the figure, the abundance of the biological pathways between the two groups are statistically significant (p < 0.05, FDR corrected). Red and blue represent the NC group and the SZ group, respectively.
Figure 5Correlation between the relative abundances of the alter genera and PANSS scores.
The color bar indicates the value of Pearson correlation’s coefficient. The size of circles indicates the degree of significance. “*”: p < 0.05, uncorrected.