Literature DB >> 32816807

The Cologne rebubbling study: a reappraisal of 624 rebubblings after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Sebastian Siebelmann1, Katharina Kolb2, Paula Scholz2, Mario Matthaei2, Jeremy Franklin3, Alexander Händel2, Silvia Schrittenlocher2, Takahiko Hayashi2, Jose L Guell4, Björn Bachmann2, Claus Cursiefen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To analyse graft detachments prior to rebubbling, the influence of rebubbling on the postoperative outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and the need for rebubbling on the contralateral eye.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, out of 1541 DMEKs, optical coherence tomography scans and clinical records of 499 eyes undergoing rebubbling after DMEK at the University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, were examined. Main Outcome measures were (a) number, localisation and size of graft detachments; (b) influence of rebubbling/s on postoperative outcome after 12 months; and (c) rebubbling risk of the contralateral eye after DMEK.
RESULTS: Mean number of detachment areas was 2.02±0.9. Mean lateral diameter of all detachments was 4534.76±1920.83 μm. Mean axial diameter was 382.53±282.02 μm. Detachments were equally distributed over all regions of the cornea. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity ( BSCVA) after 12 months was 0.197±0.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, endothelial cell density (ECD) was 1575.21±397.71 cells/mm2 and mean central corneal thickness (CCT) was 566.37±68.11 μm. BSCVA, CCT, ECD or endothelial cell loss of all rebubbled patients were not influenced by the number of rebubblings or the time between DMEK and rebubbling. Of the rebubbled patients, which received a DMEK subsequently on the other eye, 193 (58.8%) also received a rebubbling, which was significantly higher, when compared to the overall rebubbling rate of 32.3% (p=0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall number of rebubblings has no influence on the postoperative outcome after DMEK, if a rebubbling becomes necessary. Patients who received a rebubbling on one eye have an elevated risk for a rebubbling on the fellow eye. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cornea; Imaging; Treatment Surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 32816807     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  4 in total

1.  A machine learning approach to explore predictors of graft detachment following posterior lamellar keratoplasty: a nationwide registry study.

Authors:  M B Muijzer; C M W Hoven; L E Frank; G Vink; R P L Wisse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Identification of the preoperative and perioperative factors that predict postoperative endothelial cell density after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Dimitri Chaussard; Florian Bloch; Arpiné Ardzivian Elnar; Yinka Zevering; Jean-Charles Vermion; Rémi Moskwa; Jean-Marc Perone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Graft survival of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in corneal endothelial decompensation after glaucoma surgery.

Authors:  Silvia Schrittenlocher; C Grass; T Dietlein; A Lappas; M Matthaei; C Cursiefen; B Bachmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  The Cologne-Mecklenburg-Vorpommern DMEK Donor Study (COMEDOS) - design and review of the influence of donor characteristics on Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) outcome.

Authors:  Silvia Schrittenlocher; Mario Matthaei; Björn Bachmann; Claus Cursiefen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.535

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.