Literature DB >> 36271020

A machine learning approach to explore predictors of graft detachment following posterior lamellar keratoplasty: a nationwide registry study.

M B Muijzer1, C M W Hoven2, L E Frank3, G Vink3, R P L Wisse4.   

Abstract

Machine learning can be used to explore the complex multifactorial patterns underlying postsurgical graft detachment after endothelial corneal transplantation surgery and to evaluate the marginal effect of various practice pattern modulations. We included all posterior lamellar keratoplasty procedures recorded in the Dutch Cornea Transplant Registry from 2015 through 2018 and collected the center-specific practice patterns using a questionnaire. All available data regarding the donor, recipient, surgery, and practice pattern, were coded into 91 factors that might be associated with the occurrence of a graft detachment. In this research, we used three machine learning methods; a regularized logistic regression (lasso), classification tree analysis (CTA), and random forest classification (RFC), to select the most predictive subset of variables for graft detachment. A total of 3647 transplants were included in our analysis and the overall prevalence of graft detachment was 9.9%. In an independent test set the area under the curve for the lasso, CTA, and RFC was 0.70, 0.65, and 0.72, respectively. Identified risk factors included: a Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty procedure, prior graft failure, and the use of sulfur hexafluoride gas. Factors with a reduced risk included: performing combined procedures, using pre-cut donor tissue, and a pre-operative laser iridotomy. These results can help surgeons to review their practice patterns and generate hypotheses for empirical research regarding the origins of graft detachments.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36271020     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22223-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  30 in total

1.  Prevention and management of graft detachment in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Martin Dirisamer; Korine van Dijk; Isabel Dapena; Lisanne Ham; Oganesyan Oganes; Laurence E Frank; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-11-14

2.  Endothelial Survival After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Effect of Surgical Indication and Graft Adherence Status.

Authors:  Lamis Baydoun; Lisanne Ham; Vincent Borderie; Isabel Dapena; Jingzhen Hou; Laurence E Frank; Silke Oellerich; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 3.  Evolution of Endothelial Keratoplasty: Where Are We Headed?

Authors:  Francis W Price; Matthew T Feng; Marianne O Price
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated with Graft Success in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Mark A Terry; Anthony J Aldave; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Wendi Liang; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Christopher Croasdale; Yassine J Daoud; Steven P Dunn; Caroline K Hoover; Marian S Macsai; Thomas F Mauger; Sudeep Pramanik; George O D Rosenwasser; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; R Doyle Stulting; Alan Sugar; Elmer Y Tu; David D Verdier; Sonia H Yoo; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Comparison of endothelial cell loss and complications following DMEK with the use of three different graft injectors.

Authors:  K Droutsas; A Lazaridis; G D Kymionis; K Chatzistefanou; M M Moschos; C Koutsandrea; W Sekundo
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Suryan L Dunker; Mor M Dickman; Robert P L Wisse; Siamak Nobacht; Robert H J Wijdh; Marjolijn C Bartels; Mei L Tang; Frank J H M van den Biggelaar; Pieter J Kruit; Rudy M M A Nuijts
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 7.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty/Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Abhimanyu Singh; Mehran Zarei-Ghanavati; Venkata Avadhanam; Christopher Liu
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Precut DMEK Using Dextran-Containing Storage Medium Is Equivalent to Conventional DMEK: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Annekatrin Rickmann; Silke Wahl; Nicola Hofmann; Arno Haus; Regina Michaelis; Tanja Petrich; Lutz Blomberg; Martin Börgel; Sascha Jung; Peter Szurman
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Sheets glide-assisted versus Busin glide-assisted insertion techniques for descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK): A comparative analysis.

Authors:  Alok Sati; P S Moulick; Vijay Sharma; Sandeep Shankar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2018-04-05

Review 10.  Endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.

Authors:  Mayank A Nanavaty; Xue Wang; Alex J Shortt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.