Literature DB >> 32816629

Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-02-RCT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Woo Jin Hyung1, Han-Kwang Yang2, Young-Kyu Park3, Hyuk-Joon Lee2, Ji Yeong An1, Wook Kim4, Hyoung-Il Kim1, Hyung-Ho Kim5, Seung Wan Ryu6, Hoon Hur7, Min-Chan Kim8, Seong-Ho Kong2, Gyu Seok Cho9, Jin-Jo Kim10, Do Joong Park5, Keun Won Ryu11, Young Woo Kim11, Jong Won Kim12, Joo-Ho Lee13, Sang-Uk Han7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is unclear whether laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer is oncologically equivalent to open distal gastrectomy. The noninferiority of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer compared with open surgery in terms of 3-year relapse-free survival rate was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A phase III, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted for patients with histologically proven locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma suitable for distal subtotal gastrectomy. The primary end point was the 3-year relapse-free survival rate; the upper limit of the hazard ratio (HR) for noninferiority was 1.43 between the laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy groups.
RESULTS: From November 2011 to April 2015, 1,050 patients were randomly assigned to laparoscopy (n = 524) or open surgery (n = 526). After exclusions, 492 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and 482 underwent open surgery and were included in the analysis. The laparoscopy group, compared with the open surgery group, suffered fewer early complications (15.7% v 23.4%, respectively; P = .0027) and late complications (4.7% v 9.5%, respectively; P = .0038), particularly intestinal obstruction (2.0% v 4.4%, respectively; P = .0447). The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 80.3% (95% CI, 76.0% to 85.0%) for the laparoscopy group and 81.3% (95% CI, 77.0% to 85.0%; log-rank P = .726) for the open group. Cox regression analysis after stratification by the surgeon revealed an HR of 1.035 (95% CI, 0.762 to 1.406; log-rank P = .827; P for noninferiority = .039). When stratified by pathologic stage, the HR was 1.020 (95% CI, 0.751 to 1.385; log-rank P = .900; P for noninferiority = .030).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy was comparable to open surgery in terms of relapse-free survival for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy could be a potential standard treatment option for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32816629     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.01210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  50 in total

1.  Visceral fat area is a better indicator of surgical outcomes after laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer than the body mass index: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Yoshiro Imai; Sang-Woong Lee; Masaru Kawai; Keitaro Tashiro; Satoshi Kawashima; Ryo Tanaka; Kotaro Honda; Kentaro Matsuo; Kazuhisa Uchiyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  State of the art of enhance recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in esophagogastric cancer surgery: the Western experience.

Authors:  Silvia Salvans; Luis Grande; Mariagiulia Dal Cero; Manuel Pera
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-06-21

3.  Comparison of long-term outcomes after robotic versus laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: a propensity score-matching study.

Authors:  Jin-Tao Li; Jian-Xian Lin; Fu-Hai Wang; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Ju-Li Lin; Hua-Long Zheng; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang; Ping Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Evolution of treatment in gastric cancer- a systematic review.

Authors:  Sangram K Panda; Pradyumna K Sahoo; Sunil K Agarwala; Tim Houghton T; Prathamesh Panchakshari Chandrapattan; Vikas Sankar K; Ramkishan Nag
Journal:  J Egypt Natl Canc Inst       Date:  2022-03-21

Review 5.  [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological gastric surgery].

Authors:  Kaja Ludwig; Christian Barz; Uwe Scharlau
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Laparoscopic gastrectomy for early and advanced gastric cancer in a western center: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille Ramos; Marina Alessandra Pereira; André Roncon Dias; Ulysses Ribeiro; Bruno Zilberstein; Sergio Carlos Nahas
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-06-04

7.  A matched cohort study of the failure pattern after laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: does the operative approach matter?

Authors:  Jun Lu; Dong Wu; Bin-Bin Xu; Zhen Xue; Hua-Long Zheng; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Ping Li; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: Current status and future directions.

Authors:  Jiahui Chen; Zhaode Bu; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: Current status and future direction.

Authors:  So Hyun Kang; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 10.  The 140 years' journey of gastric cancer surgery: From the two hands of Billroth to the multiple hands of the robot.

Authors:  Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.