Md Zahorul Islam1,2, Yuji Sawatari1, Shusuke Kojima1, Yusuke Kiyama1, Moe Nakamura1, Kyouko Sasaki3, Mika Otsuka4, Takeshi Obi5, Mitsuya Shiraishi1, Atsushi Miyamoto1. 1. Department of Veterinary Pharmacology, Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kagoshima University, 1-21-24 Korimoto, Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan. 2. Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh. 3. Kagoshima Prefecture Meet Hygiene Inspection Center, 10-1 Kamoike-Shinmachi, Kagoshima 890-8577, Japan. 4. Kagoshima City Aquarium, 3-1 Honkou-Shinmachi, Kagoshima 892-0814, Japan. 5. Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kagoshima University, 1-21-24 Korimoto, Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan.
Abstract
From an evolutionary aspect, dolphins share a very close phylogenetic relationship with pigs. Previously, we characterized porcine cerebral artery responsiveness to intrinsic vasoactive substances. Therefore, here, we investigated dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) cerebral artery responsiveness to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), histamine (His), angiotensin (Ang) II, acetylcholine (ACh), noradrenaline (NA), and bradykinin (BK) to characterize their related receptor subtypes. We also compared dolphin cerebral artery responsiveness with porcine cerebral artery responsiveness. We found that 5-HT and His induced concentration-dependent contraction of the dolphin cerebral artery. Ketanserin (a 5-HT2 antagonist) and methiothepin (a 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 antagonist) shifted the concentration-response curve for 5-HT to the right. Although diphenhydramine (an H1 antagonist) shifted the concentration-response curve for His to the right, cimetidine (an H2 antagonist) had no such effect. Ang II and ACh did not produce any vasomotor actions. NA induced concentration-dependent relaxation. Propranolol (a β antagonist) shifted the concentration-response curve for NA to the right, whereas phentolamine (an α antagonist) had no significant effect. BK induced relaxation followed by contraction in pre-contracted arteries with intact endothelium. HOE140 (a B2 antagonist) shifted the concentration-response curve for BK to the right, whereas des-Arg9-[Leu8]-BK (a B1 antagonist) had no significant effect. These results suggest that 5-HT1, 5-HT2, and H1 receptor subtypes are important in arterial contraction and that β and B2 receptor subtypes modify these contractions to relaxations. The responsiveness of the dolphin cerebral artery is very similar to that of porcine cerebral artery, supporting their evolutionary linkage.
From an evolutionary aspect, dolphins share a very close phylogenetic relationship with pigs. Previously, we characterized porcine cerebral artery responsiveness to intrinsic vasoactive substances. Therefore, here, we investigated dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) cerebral artery responsiveness to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), histamine (His), angiotensin (Ang) II, acetylcholine (ACh), noradrenaline (NA), and bradykinin (BK) to characterize their related receptor subtypes. We also compared dolphin cerebral artery responsiveness with porcine cerebral artery responsiveness. We found that 5-HT and His induced concentration-dependent contraction of the dolphin cerebral artery. Ketanserin (a 5-HT2 antagonist) and methiothepin (a 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 antagonist) shifted the concentration-response curve for 5-HT to the right. Although diphenhydramine (an H1 antagonist) shifted the concentration-response curve for His to the right, cimetidine (an H2 antagonist) had no such effect. Ang II and ACh did not produce any vasomotor actions. NA induced concentration-dependent relaxation. Propranolol (a β antagonist) shifted the concentration-response curve for NA to the right, whereas phentolamine (an α antagonist) had no significant effect. BK induced relaxation followed by contraction in pre-contracted arteries with intact endothelium. HOE140 (a B2 antagonist) shifted the concentration-response curve for BK to the right, whereas des-Arg9-[Leu8]-BK (a B1 antagonist) had no significant effect. These results suggest that 5-HT1, 5-HT2, and H1 receptor subtypes are important in arterial contraction and that β and B2 receptor subtypes modify these contractions to relaxations. The responsiveness of the dolphin cerebral artery is very similar to that of porcine cerebral artery, supporting their evolutionary linkage.
The responsiveness of cerebral arteries to intrinsic vasoactive substances is species
specific, and some reactivities are unique and characteristic. As an example, although
noradrenaline (NA) is a vasoconstrictor that induces the contraction of the cerebral artery in
dogs [33] and guinea pigs [3], it induces relaxation of the cerebral artery in cattle [1] and pigs [18].
Moreover, the intensity of relaxation in pigs is much greater than that in cattle. Therefore,
a large relaxation induced by NA is one of the distinctive characteristics of the porcine
cerebral artery. In another example, bradykinin (BK), a vasorelaxant, induces relaxation in
human cerebral arteries, but induces a very strong contraction in the equine cerebral artery
[32]. The contraction induced by BK in the equine
cerebral artery is greater than that induced in the equine cerebral artery by NA, histamine
(His), or 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT). Therefore, a BK-induced contraction is a distinctive
characteristic of the equine cerebral artery. To our knowledge, cerebral arterial
responsiveness to these vasoactive substances in one animal species is not identical o that in
other species. Therefore, characterization of cerebral artery reactivity in different species
of animal may be useful to investigate evolutionary linkage among animals.Although the dolphin is an aquatic mammal, it shares many characteristics with terrestrial
mammals. Cetaceans evolved from ancient even-toed animals (Artiodactyla) at the end of the
cretaceous period (approximately 55 million years ago) [6]. The ancestors of cetaceans first lived in a terrestrial environment and then
adapted to an aquatic environment. Several anatomical, morphological, and physiological
adaptations to living underwater have been well studied, including the streamlined body shape,
the location of the blowhole, the higher basal metabolic rate, and the lower maximum rate of
oxygen consumption to maintain thermoregulation [13,
36].The vascular system of marine mammals plays a key role during the dive response, where high
fluctuations in oxygen availability or consumption may be encountered. Potential vasodilator/
vasoconstrictor mechanisms of cerebrovascular control and increased cerebral blood flow during
voluntary diving are consistent with the dynamics of cerebral blood flow in hypercapnia in
terrestrial mammals [4]. Local vasodilator and
neural-mediated vascular control mechanisms both ensure the brain can access the available
blood oxygen [4]. Considering the evolutionary and
adaptive changes in dolphin, a study of cerebral artery responsiveness to intrinsic vasoactive
substances in dolphin would be of considerable interest. Cerebral artery responsiveness in
dolphins could then be compared with that in terrestrial mammals, especially those with a
close evolutionary relationship.Because of their close phylogeny [5, 27], numerous comparative studies between dolphins and pigs
have been conducted in other fields [15, 26, 28, 31]. There are, however, unanswered questions concerning
the physiological changes that have occurred over the course of evolution in dolphins as a
result of adaptation to the marine environment.Although there has been extensive research on the vascular reactivity of different
terrestrial and amphibious animals, information regarding vascular reactivity in aquatic
animals is limited. We have previously characterized the cerebral artery responsiveness to
intrinsic vasoactive substances in pig [16,17,18, 21,22,23,24], and have
extensively researched pig cerebral artery function [10, 21, 22, 24]. In addition, it has been
demonstrated a close phylogenetic relationship between pig and dolphin [5, 27]. Here, we report the
responsiveness of isolated dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) cerebral arteries to
5-HT, His, Ang II, ACh, NA, and BK.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tissue preparation
We isolated cerebral arteries from the heads of dead bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops
truncates) (both sexes, indeterminate age range, body weight 200 ± 26.7 kg),
which had been captured in Taiji, Japan, during drive hunt fishing practices permitted by
the Wakayama Prefecture government. Section of the cerebral arteries (proximal part of
meningeal artery) were then gently isolated from the brain and transferred to ice-cold
physiological saline (119 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.6 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM
MgCl2, 25 mM NaHCO3, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, and 10
mM glucose, pH 7.4) aerated with carbogen (95% (v/v) O2, 5% (v/v)
CO2) and transferred to our laboratory. The location of the sampled artery
section apparently corresponds with that of basilar artery in terrestrial mammals. Each
artery was immediately dissected free of adherent tissues under a stereomicroscope. All
experiments were performed in accordance with the Kagoshima University Guidelines for
Animal Experimentation.
Reagents
The following reagents were all obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used
at the indicated final concentrations:5-HT (10−9–10−5 M); ketanserin tartrate
(10−8–10−7 M); methiothepin maleate
(10−8–10−7 M); His hydrochloride (10−6–10−3
M); diphenhydramine hydrochloride (10−7–10−4 M); cimetidine
(10−5 M); Ang II acetate salt (10−9–10−5 M); NA
(10−9–10−5 M); phentolamine mesilate (10−5 M);
propranolol hydrochloride (10−8–10−6 M); BK acetate salt
(10−9–10−6 M); des-Arg9- [Leu8]-BK
(10−5 M); Nω-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA; 10−4 M);
and sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 10−4 M).The following reagents were obtained and used at the indicated final concentrations:
HOE140 (10−8–10−6 M; Peptide Institute, Osaka, Japan); indomethacin
(10−5 M; Nacalai tesque, Kyoto, Japan); ACh chloride
(10−9–10−5 M; Daiichi Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan). All drugs were
dissolved in distilled water.
Functional studies
Three or four rings of approximately 4 mm length were cut from each artery. Each ring was
mounted horizontally between two L-shaped stainless steel holders (outer diameter, 0.5
mm), with one part fixed to an isometric force transducer and immersed in a 4
ml water-jacketed a micro tissue organ bath (UMTB-1, Unique Medical
Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) containing oxygenated salt solution at 37°C (pH 7.4). Each
suspended ring was allowed to equilibrate for at least 120 min under a resting tension of
0.50 g. This tension was chosen to allow induction of maximum contractions in the artery.
KCl (60 mM) treatment was applied every 30 min until the amplitude of contractions reached
a constant value. Changes in the KCl concentration of the physiological saline were
compensated by equimolar adjustment of the NaCl concentration. The isometric tension was
recorded using an amplifier (AP-621G, Nihon Kohden Kogyo, Tokyo, Japan), digitized with an
analog-digital converter (PowerLab/8SP, ADInstruments Co., Castle Hill, NSW, Australia),
and stored on the hard disk of a personal computer. The cumulative concentration-response
curve of each agonist was obtained by adding a solution of agonist directly to the fluid
in the bath. Antagonists were added to the bathing media 30 min before adding the agonist.
The antagonists had no effect on the resting vascular tone. The log concentration ratio of
EC50 values (i.e., concentration producing half-maximum response) in the
absence or presence of antagonists was calculated and plotted against the logarithm of
antagonist concentration to obtain pA2 values.
Statistical analyses
Results are expressed as means ± standard error of mean. Statistical analyses were
performed by the Student’s t test or Bonferroni test after one-way
analysis of variance (Stat View J-4.5, Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA).
Significance was established when the probability level was equal to or less than 5%.
RESULTS
Responsiveness to 5-HT, His, Ang II, ACh, NA, and BK
We first investigated the vascular responsiveness to 5-HT, His, Ang II, ACh, NA, and BK
in resting tension. We then confirmed the relaxation in the presence of these agonists in
pre-contraction with U46619 (a thromboxane A2 analog; 10−8 M).
Finally, we generated concentration-response curves for all the agonists in isolated
dolphin cerebral arteries with endothelial cells (Fig.
1). 5-HT and His induced contraction in a concentration-dependent manner in resting
tension, but no relaxation was observed for these agonists in pre-contraction. Ang II and
ACh did not induce any changes under either condition. NA induced relaxations under both
conditions, but the magnitude of the relaxation in pre-contraction was greater than that
in resting tension. Endothelial removal had no effect on NA-induced relaxations. BK
induced complicated and unstable response, including relaxation and contraction in resting
tension. In pre-contraction, however, BK induced concentration-dependent relaxation
(10−9–10−7 M) followed by contraction (10−6 M). Table 1 shows the pEC50 values and maximal responses for the agonists
examined. Although L-NNA (a NO synthase inhibitor, 10−4 M) induced contraction
(8.15 ± 0.59% to 60 mM KCl) under resting tension, indomethacin (a cyclo-oxygenase
inhibitor, 10−5 M) induced relaxation (2.2 ± 0.24% to 60 mM KCl) under
contraction induced by L-NNA (data not shown). The magnitude of contraction induced by 60
mM KCl was 0.35 ± 0.03 g (n=9).
Fig. 1.
Responsiveness of the isolated dolphin cerebral artery with intact endothelium to
5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT: ●), histamine (His: ○), angiotensin II (Ang II: ×),
acetylcholine (ACh: ◊), noradrenaline (NA: ■), and bradykinin (BK: □). Relaxation in
response to NA and BK was investigated in pre-contraction with U46619 (a thromboxane
A2 analog; 10−8 M). The contraction induced by 60 mM KCl and
relaxation induced by sodium nitroprusside (10−4 M) was taken as 100%.
Each point represents the mean ± SEM for 6–8 dolphins.
Table 1.
The pEC50 values and maximal responses for agonists
Agonists
pEC50
Max (%)
5-HT
7.44 ± 0.08
70.12 ± 8.85a)
Histamine
5.82 ± 0.06
31.10 ± 5.93a)
ACh
–
No response
Ang II
–
No response
Noradrenaline
6.15 ± 0.12
−59.13 ± 5.75b)
Bradykinin
8.8 ± 0.14
−78.18 ± 5.50b)
a) Contraction induced by 60 mM KCl was taken as 100%. b) Relaxation induced by
10−4 M sodium nitroprusside was taken as 100%. Each point represents
the mean ± SEM for 6−8 dolphins.
Responsiveness of the isolated dolphin cerebral artery with intact endothelium to
5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT: ●), histamine (His: ○), angiotensin II (Ang II: ×),
acetylcholine (ACh: ◊), noradrenaline (NA: ■), and bradykinin (BK: □). Relaxation in
response to NA and BK was investigated in pre-contraction with U46619 (a thromboxane
A2 analog; 10−8 M). The contraction induced by 60 mM KCl and
relaxation induced by sodium nitroprusside (10−4 M) was taken as 100%.
Each point represents the mean ± SEM for 6–8 dolphins.a) Contraction induced by 60 mM KCl was taken as 100%. b) Relaxation induced by
10−4 M sodium nitroprusside was taken as 100%. Each point represents
the mean ± SEM for 6−8 dolphins.
Effects of ketanserin and methiothepin on 5-HT-induced contraction
We investigated the effects of ketanserin (a 5-HT2 antagonist) and
methiotheipin (a 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 antagonist) on the 5-HT-induced
concentration-response curve in isolated dolphin cerebral arteries. Ketanserin
(10−8−10−7 M) shifted the concentration-response curve for 5-HT to
the right (Fig. 2A). The calculated pA2 value for ketanserin was 8.52 ± 0.09 and its slope
was 0.87 ± 0.08 (Fig. 2B), which was not
significantly different from unity. Methiothepin (10−8−10−7 M) also
shifted the concentration-response curve for 5-HT to the right (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2.
Effect of the 5-HT2-receptor antagonist ketanserin (▲: 10−8 M
and △: 10−7 M) on 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)-induced contraction (●) [A]
and Schild plot of ketanserin [B] in isolated dolphin cerebral arteries with intact
endothelium. The maximum contraction induced by 5-HT in the absence of ketanserin
was taken as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± SEM for 6 dolphins. CR indicates
the equieffective 5-HT concentration ratio [concentration producing 50% maximal
concentration (EC50) in the presence of ketanserin/EC50 in the
absence of ketanserin].
Fig. 3.
Effect of the 5-HT1 and 5-HT2-receptor antagonist
methiothepin (▲: 10−8 M and ∆: 10−7 M) on 5-hydroxytryptamine
(5-HT)-induced contraction (●) in isolated dolphin cerebral arteries with intact
endothelium. The maximum contraction induced by 5-HT in the absence of methiothepin
was taken as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± SEM for 6 dolphins.
Effect of the 5-HT2-receptor antagonist ketanserin (▲: 10−8 M
and △: 10−7 M) on 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)-induced contraction (●) [A]
and Schild plot of ketanserin [B] in isolated dolphin cerebral arteries with intact
endothelium. The maximum contraction induced by 5-HT in the absence of ketanserin
was taken as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± SEM for 6 dolphins. CR indicates
the equieffective 5-HT concentration ratio [concentration producing 50% maximal
concentration (EC50) in the presence of ketanserin/EC50 in the
absence of ketanserin].Effect of the 5-HT1 and 5-HT2-receptor antagonist
methiothepin (▲: 10−8 M and ∆: 10−7 M) on 5-hydroxytryptamine
(5-HT)-induced contraction (●) in isolated dolphin cerebral arteries with intact
endothelium. The maximum contraction induced by 5-HT in the absence of methiothepin
was taken as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± SEM for 6 dolphins.
Effects of diphenhydramine and cimetidine on His-induced contraction
We investigated the effects of diphenhydramine (a H1 antagonist) and
cimetidine (a H2 antagonist) on the concentration-response curve for His.
Diphenhydramine (10−6–10−4 M) shifted the concentration-response
curve for His in parallel to the right (Fig. 4A). In contrast, cimetidine (10−5 M) had no significant
effect on the concentration-response curve for His (Fig. 4A). The calculated pA2 value for diphenhydramine was 7.26 ±
0.13 and its slope was 1.31 ± 0.16, which was not significantly different from unity
(Fig. 4B).
Fig. 4.
Effects of the H1 receptor antagonist diphenhydramine (▲:
10−7 M, △: 10−6 M, □: 10−5 M) and the
H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine (○: 10−5 M) on histamine
(His)-induced contraction (●) [A] and Schild plot of diphenhydramine [B] in the
isolated dolphin cerebral artery with intact endothelium. The contraction induced
by His in the absence of antagonist was taken as 100%. Each point represents the
mean ± SEM for 7 dolphins. CR: see Fig.
2.
Effects of the H1 receptor antagonist diphenhydramine (▲:
10−7 M, △: 10−6 M, □: 10−5 M) and the
H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine (○: 10−5 M) on histamine
(His)-induced contraction (●) [A] and Schild plot of diphenhydramine [B] in the
isolated dolphin cerebral artery with intact endothelium. The contraction induced
by His in the absence of antagonist was taken as 100%. Each point represents the
mean ± SEM for 7 dolphins. CR: see Fig.
2.
Effects of phentolamine and propranolol on NA-induced relaxation
We examined the effects of phentolamine and propranolol, non-selective α and
β-adrenoceptor antagonists, respectively, on the concentration-response curve for NA.
Phentolamine (10−5 M) showed no significant effect. Propranolol shifted the
concentration-response curve for NA parallel to the right in a concentration-dependent
manner (Fig. 5A). The calculated pA2 value for propranolol was 8.01 ± 0.11 and its slope
was 1.56 ± 0.13 (Fig. 5B), which was not
significantly different from unity.
Fig. 5.
Effects of the β-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol (▽: 10−8 M, ▼:
10−7 M and □: 10−6 M) and the α-adrenoceptor antagonist
phentolamine (○: 10−5 M) on noradrenaline (NA)-induced relaxation (●) [A]
and Schild plot of propranolol [B] in the isolated dolphin cerebral artery with
intact endothelium. The relaxation induced by NA in the absence of antagonist was
taken as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± SEM for 6 dolphins. CR: see Fig. 2.
Effects of the β-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol (▽: 10−8 M, ▼:
10−7 M and □: 10−6 M) and the α-adrenoceptor antagonist
phentolamine (○: 10−5 M) on noradrenaline (NA)-induced relaxation (●) [A]
and Schild plot of propranolol [B] in the isolated dolphin cerebral artery with
intact endothelium. The relaxation induced by NA in the absence of antagonist was
taken as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± SEM for 6 dolphins. CR: see Fig. 2.
Effects of endothelial removal, L-NNA, and indomethacin on BK-induced
relaxation
Endothelial denudation completely abolished both BK-induced relaxation and contraction.
Pretreatment with L-NNA significantly inhibited BK-induced relaxation but enhanced
contraction. Indomethacin had no significant effect on BK-induced relaxation but abolished
BK-induced contraction (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
Effects of Nω-nitro-L-arginine (▼: 10−4 M),
indomethacin (○: 10−5 M), and endothelial removal (▽) on bradykinin
(BK)-induced biphasic responses (●) in the isolated dolphin cerebral artery. The
relaxation induced by BK in the absence of inhibitor was taken as 100%. Each point
represents the mean ± SEM for 6 dolphins.
Effects of Nω-nitro-L-arginine (▼: 10−4 M),
indomethacin (○: 10−5 M), and endothelial removal (▽) on bradykinin
(BK)-induced biphasic responses (●) in the isolated dolphin cerebral artery. The
relaxation induced by BK in the absence of inhibitor was taken as 100%. Each point
represents the mean ± SEM for 6 dolphins.
Effects of B1 and B2 receptor antagonists on BK-induced
relaxation
To characterize the BK receptor subtypes, the arteries were pretreated with B1
and B2 receptor antagonists. Des-Arg9-[Leu8]-BK (a
B1 antagonist) had no significant effect on BK-induced response of the
dolphin cerebral arteries. HOE140 (10−8−10−6 M; a B2
antagonist) shifted the BK-induced concentration-response curve to the right (Fig. 7A). The calculated pA2 value for HOE140 was 8.30 ± 0.08 and its slope was
1.16 ± 0.04 (Fig. 7B), which was not
significantly different from unity. The pA2 value for HOE140 was calculated
from the relaxation response part of the BK-induced responses in dolphin cerebral
arteries.
Fig. 7.
Effects of the B1 receptor antagonist
des-Arg9-[Leu8]-bradykinin (○, 10−5 M) and the
B2 receptor antagonist HOE140 (▼: 10−8 M, ▽: 10−7
M and □: 10−6 M) on bradykinin (BK)-induced biphasic responses (●) [A]
and Schild plot of HOE140 in the isolated dolphin cerebral artery [B]. The
relaxation induced by BK in the absence of antagonist was taken as 100%. Each point
represents the mean ± SEM for 6 dolphins. CR: see Fig. 2.
Effects of the B1 receptor antagonist
des-Arg9-[Leu8]-bradykinin (○, 10−5 M) and the
B2 receptor antagonist HOE140 (▼: 10−8 M, ▽: 10−7
M and □: 10−6 M) on bradykinin (BK)-induced biphasic responses (●) [A]
and Schild plot of HOE140 in the isolated dolphin cerebral artery [B]. The
relaxation induced by BK in the absence of antagonist was taken as 100%. Each point
represents the mean ± SEM for 6 dolphins. CR: see Fig. 2.
DISCUSSION
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the responsiveness of
the isolated dolphin cerebral artery to 5-HT, His, Ang II, ACh, NA, and BK as well as to
investigate the receptor subtypes involved in this responsiveness.Our results revealed that 5-HT-induced concentration-dependent contractions of the isolated
dolphin cerebral artery. The pEC50 value (7.44 ± 0.08) of 5-HT in dolphin
cerebral arteries was similar to that observed in pig cerebral arteries (7.70 ± 0.10), a
response mediated via the activation of 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 receptors
[23]. Ketanserin, a 5-HT2-receptor
antagonist, shifted the concentration-response curve of 5-HT to the right (Fig. 2A). The pA2 value for ketanserin
(8.52 ± 0.09) observed in this study is similar to that observed for human mesenteric
arteries (8.40 ± 0.25) [7] and equine cerebral
arteries (8.91) [25]; however, it is lower than that
observed for the porcine cerebral artery (9.58 ± 0.13) [23]. Methiothepin, a 5-HT1, and 5-HT2-receptor antagonist,
shifted the concentration-response curve of 5-HT to the right and downward (Fig. 3). Methiothepin is reported to have high
affinity to the 5-HT2 receptor (pKB or pA2=9.0) and low
affinity to the 5-HT1 receptor (pKB or pA2=7.7) [9]. Therefore, we consider that methiothepin may inhibit
5-HT2-related contraction at a low concentration and both 5-HT1 and
5-HT2-related contraction at a high concentration. A similar phenomenon has
been observed in the porcine cerebral artery which has 5-HT1 and 5-HT2
receptors [23]. Our data indicate that 5-HT-induced
contractions in the dolphin cerebral artery involve both 5-HT1 and
5-HT2 subtypes. Similar findings have been reported for the equine cerebral
artery [25].His induced concentration-dependent contractions in the isolated dolphin cerebral artery.
The pEC50 value (5.82 ± 0.06) of His in the dolphin cerebral artery was close to
that in porcine cerebral artery (5.17 ± 0.16) [16].
The H1 receptor antagonist diphenhydramine shifted the concentration-response
curve of His to the right, whereas the H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine had no
significant effect. These results suggest that H1 receptor activation induces the
contraction of the dolphin cerebral artery. Contraction of the resting vascular tone in
response to His has also been reported in pigs [16],
cattle, horses [20], and guinea pigs [3]. The calculated pA2 value for
diphenhydramine was 7.26 ± 0.13, which is very close to the values reported for bovine
(7.61) and porcine (7.77) cerebral arteries [16,
20].Ang II and ACh did not induce any vasomotor action in the dolphin cerebral artery. In
contrast, Ang II induced a very weak contraction in the porcine cerebral artery, with a
variation in proximal to distal part responses and a variation in repeated application
responses [24]. ACh did not induce any vasomotor
action in the porcine cerebral artery either (unpublished data). Thus, muscarinic receptors
may be absent or poor in the dolphin cerebral artery. Diphenhydramine is a potent muscarinic
antagonist in addition to being an H1-selective antihistamine [14]. However, ACh did not produce any vasomotor action in
resting tension or pre-contraction in dolphin cerebral artery. Therefore, we consider that
diphenhydramine may not affect muscarine receptors in this artery. Differences in the
responsiveness to these substances may be due to the absence of their receptors on smooth
muscle or endothelial cells.NA induced relaxation in the dolphin cerebral artery in a concentration-dependent manner.
The pEC50 value of NA (6.15 ± 0.12) in the dolphin cerebral artery was similar to
that in the porcine cerebral artery [18]. A
non-selective β-adrenoceptor antagonist, propranolol (10−8−10−6 M),
inhibited NA-induced relaxation in a concentration-dependent manner. Moreover, pretreatment
with 10−5 M propranolol avoided this relaxation and induced slight contractions,
which could be blocked by pretreatment with phentolamine, a non-selective α-adrenoceptor
antagonist (data not shown). Together, these results suggest that the relaxation induced by
NA is mediated through the stimulation of β-adrenoceptors and that few α-adrenoceptors
modify NA-induced relaxations. These results were similar to those obtained for porcine
cerebral [18] and coronary arteries [37].BK-induced relaxation was abolished in arteries after endothelial denudation as shown in
Fig. 6. Pretreatment with L-NNA shifted the
concentration-response curve for BK to the right, and indomethacin abolished BK-induced
contraction. These results suggest that endothelium-dependent responses to BK are primarily
mediated via NO (relaxation event) and contractile prostaglandins (PGs). This result was
also consistent with previous findings on the porcine cerebral artery [17]. In pigs, PGF2α has been identified as contractile PG
[10].In the present study, the relaxing and contracting effects of BK were significantly
inhibited by HOE140 but not by the B1 receptor antagonist
des-Arg9-[Leu8]-BK, as shown in Fig. 7. These data indicate that the dilating and contracting responses of BK in
the dolphin cerebral artery are mediated by the B2 receptor and not by the
B1 receptor. B1 receptor-mediated responses are generally not
observed under normal physiological conditions [34].
The calculated pA2 value of HOE140 was 8.30 ± 0.08, which is similar to that
reported for the guinea-pig ileum (8.42) [8] and human
umbilical vein (8.52) [30]. Although relaxation
induced by the activation of endothelial B2 receptors has been reported in human
[35] and mouse [11] cerebral arteries, contraction induced by the activation of endothelial
B2-receptors in cerebral arteries has only been reported in the porcine
cerebral artery [17].The coexistence of two different BK receptor subtypes (B1 and B2) in
the same artery may cause a biphasic response to BK [29]. However, as observed with the porcine cerebral artery, dolphin cerebral
artery demonstrated a biphasic response owing to only one type of BK receptor
(B2). It will be of interest to determine how the signal from the B2
receptor regulates the pathways of both the cyclo-oxygenase and NO synthase systems in
endothelial cells and to determine why the relaxant response was first evoked before the
contractile response. It has been previously reported that the stimulation of B2
receptors activates the NO synthase pathway [12] and
the cyclo-oxygenase pathway [2] via the activation of
heterotrimeric G-proteins of the Gi and Gq family [19]. Thus, further studies are needed to clarify this issue.In summary, we investigated the responses of the dolphin cerebral artery to several
pharmacological agents that are modulators of cerebrovascular circulation in both normal and
pathophysiological states. We demonstrated that 5-HT and His induce contractions in the
dolphin cerebral artery, NA and BK induce relaxation, and Ang II and ACh induce no response.
Our results show that dolphins and pigs show a high degree of similarity in cerebral artery
responsiveness to intrinsic vasoactive substances, thus strengthen the evidence of their
close phylogenetic relationship.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Authors: Andrew D Foote; Yue Liu; Gregg W C Thomas; Tomáš Vinař; Jessica Alföldi; Jixin Deng; Shannon Dugan; Cornelis E van Elk; Margaret E Hunter; Vandita Joshi; Ziad Khan; Christie Kovar; Sandra L Lee; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Annalaura Mancia; Rasmus Nielsen; Xiang Qin; Jiaxin Qu; Brian J Raney; Nagarjun Vijay; Jochen B W Wolf; Matthew W Hahn; Donna M Muzny; Kim C Worley; M Thomas P Gilbert; Richard A Gibbs Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2015-01-26 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: F J Hock; K Wirth; U Albus; W Linz; H J Gerhards; G Wiemer; S Henke; G Breipohl; W König; J Knolle Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 1991-03 Impact factor: 8.739