We investigated the responsiveness of the mouse basilar artery to acetylcholine (ACh), bradykinin (BK), noradrenaline (NA), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), histamine (His) and angiotensin (Ang) II in order to characterize the related receptor subtypes in vitro. ACh and BK induced endothelium-dependent relaxation of precontracted arteries with U-46619 (a thromboxane A2 analogue). Atropine (a non-selective muscarinic receptor antagonist) and Nω-nitro-L-arginine (a NO synthase inhibitor, L-NNA) shifted the concentration-response curve for ACh to the right, whereas pirenzepine, methoctramine and pFHHSiD (muscarinic M1, M2 and M3 antagonists, respectively) had no significant effect. L-NNA and HOE140 (a B2 antagonist) shifted the concentration-response curve for BK to the right, whereas des-Arg(9)-[Leu(8)]-BK (a B1 antagonist) and indomethacin (a cyclooxygenase inhibitor) had no significant effect. NA failed to produce any vasomotor action. His and Ang II induced concentration-dependent contraction. Diphenhydramine (a H1 antagonist) shifted the concentration-response curve for His to the right, whereas cimetidine (a H2 antagonist) had no significant effect. Losartan (an AT1 antagonist) shifted the concentration-response curve for Ang II to the right, whereas PD123319 (an AT2 antagonist) had no significant effect. These results suggest that the H1 and AT1 receptor subtypes might play an important role in arterial contraction, whereas muscarinic receptor subtypes apart from M1, M2 and M3, and B2 receptors on the endothelium, might modify these contractions to relaxations.
We investigated the responsiveness of the mouse basilar artery to acetylcholine (ACh), bradykinin (BK), noradrenaline (NA), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), histamine (His) and angiotensin (Ang) II in order to characterize the related receptor subtypes in vitro. ACh and BK induced endothelium-dependent relaxation of precontracted arteries with U-46619 (a thromboxane A2 analogue). Atropine (a non-selective muscarinic receptor antagonist) and Nω-nitro-L-arginine (a NO synthase inhibitor, L-NNA) shifted the concentration-response curve for ACh to the right, whereas pirenzepine, methoctramine and pFHHSiD (muscarinic M1, M2 and M3 antagonists, respectively) had no significant effect. L-NNA and HOE140 (a B2 antagonist) shifted the concentration-response curve for BK to the right, whereas des-Arg(9)-[Leu(8)]-BK (a B1 antagonist) and indomethacin (a cyclooxygenase inhibitor) had no significant effect. NA failed to produce any vasomotor action. His and Ang II induced concentration-dependent contraction. Diphenhydramine (a H1 antagonist) shifted the concentration-response curve for His to the right, whereas cimetidine (a H2 antagonist) had no significant effect. Losartan (an AT1 antagonist) shifted the concentration-response curve for Ang II to the right, whereas PD123319 (an AT2 antagonist) had no significant effect. These results suggest that the H1 and AT1 receptor subtypes might play an important role in arterial contraction, whereas muscarinic receptor subtypes apart from M1, M2 and M3, and B2 receptors on the endothelium, might modify these contractions to relaxations.
Because of the very small internal diameter (0.09–0.14 mm) and length (4–5 mm) of the mouse
basilar artery, little information has been available regarding its reactivity to intrinsic
vasoactive substances, such as acetylcholine (ACh), bradykinin (BK), noradrenaline (NA),
5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), histamine (His) and angiotensin (Ang) II in vitro
and the receptor subtypes involved.The basilar artery runs along the ventral aspect of the medulla oblongata and supplies the
brain with blood in reptiles [33], birds [20] and mammals. The responsiveness of this artery seems to
reflect changes in cerebral blood flow and local microvascular pressure. Species differences
in the responsiveness of this artery to intrinsic vasoactive substances have been reported,
and some are very unique and characteristic. For example, NA, a well-known vasoconstrictor,
induces contraction of the basilar artery in dogs [26],
monkeys [24], guinea pigs [7] and rabbits [8], whereas it induces
relaxation in that of cattle [3] and pigs [16]. The intensity of relaxation in pigs is much greater
than that in cattle, and this larger relaxation induced by NA is one of the characteristics of
porcine basilar artery. In other case, BK, which is a well-known vasorelaxing factor, induces
relaxation in human basilar artery, but induces very strong contraction in equine basilar
artery [25]. The contraction induced by BK is greater
than that induced by NA, His or 5-HT, and this is also one of the characteristics of the
equine basilar artery.Differences in responsiveness to these vasoactive substances might be dependent on
differences in the distribution of their receptor subtypes on smooth muscle or endothelial
cells. To our knowledge, basilar arterial responsiveness to these vasoactive substances in one
species of animal has never been similar to that of other species. Therefore, characterization
of basilar arterial reactivity in different species of animal would appear to be useful for
investigating evolutionary relationships among animals.Mice are widely considered to be a prime model of inherited human disease and share 99% of
their genes with humans [28]. They are the most
commonly used vertebrate species, because of their availability, size, low cost, ease of
handling and high reproduction rate. The routine availability of mouse models of various
cerebral circulatory disorders like Alzheimer’s disease, migraine and stroke (4) requires
characterization of the regulation of basilar arterial tone. A study of basilar artery is
important, because it is one of the major resistance vessels in the brain.In the present study, therefore, we attempted to clarify in detail the responsiveness of
isolated mouse basilar arteries to ACh, BK, NA, 5-HT, His and Ang II and the receptor subtypes
involved.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tissue preparation: Adult male mice (ICR, weight: 40 ± 5 g,
age: 4 months ± 15 days) were decapitated under diethylether anesthesia. The
basilar arteries were then gently isolated from the brain and transferred to ice-cold
physiological saline (119 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.6 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM
MgCl2, 25 mM NaHCO3, 1.2 mM KH2PO4 and 10 mM
glucose), pH 7.4, aerated with carbogen (95% (v/v) O2, 5% (v/v) CO2).
Each artery was immediately dissected free of adherent tissues under a stereomicroscope. All
experiments were performed in accordance with the Kagoshima University Guidelines for Animal
Experimentation.Reagents: We used the following reagents and final concentrations: NA
(10−9–10−5 M), His hydrochloride (10−6–10−3
M), diphenhydramine hydrochloride (10−7–10−4 M), cimetidine
(10−5 M), Ang II acetate salt (10−9–10−5 M), losartan
potassium (10−7 and 10−6 M), PD123319 ditrifluoroacetate salt
(10−6 M), BK acetate salt (10−9–10−6 M),
des-Arg9- [Leu8]-BK (10−5 M), methoctramine hydrate
(10−6 M), Nω-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA; 10−4 M) and
sodium nitroprusside (SNP; 10−4 M) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.). 5-HT
(serotonin)-creatinine sulfate (10−9–10−5 M; Merck, Darmstadt,
Germany), HOE140 (10−7 and 10−6 M; Peptide Institute, Osaka, Japan),
indomethacin (10−5 M; Nacalai tesque, Kyoto, Japan), ACh chloride
(10−9–10−5 M; Daiichi Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan), pirenzepine
dihydrochloride (10−6 M; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, U.S.A.),
hexahydro-sila-difenidol hydrochloride, p-fluoro analog (pFHHSiD,
10−5 M; Research Biochemicals, Natick, MA, U.S.A.) and U-46619 (10−7
M; Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A.). All drugs were dissolved in distilled
water.Functional studies: Two rings approximately 2 mm long were cut from each
mouse basilar artery. Each ring was mounted horizontally between two L-shaped stainless
steel holders (outer diameter 0.02 mm), with one part fixed to an isometric force transducer
(TB-611T, Nihon Kohden Kogyo, Tokyo, Japan), and immersed in a 4-ml
water-jacketed micro tissue organ bath (UMTB-1, Unique Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan)
containing oxygenated salt solution at 37°C (pH 7.4). Each suspended ring was left to
equilibrate for at least 120 min under a resting tension of 0.03 g. This tension was chosen,
because it allowed us to induce maximum contractions in the basilar artery. KCl (60 mM) was
applied every 30 min until the amplitude of the contraction reached a constant value.
Changes in the KCl concentration of the physiological saline were compensated for by
equimolar adjustment of the NaCl concentration. The isometric tension was recorded with an
amplifier (AP-621G, Nihon Kohden Kogyo, Tokyo, Japan), digitized with an analogue-digital
converter (PowerLab/8SP, ADInstruments Co., Castle Hill, NSW, Australia) and stored on the
hard disk of a personal computer. The cumulative concentration-response curve of each
agonist was obtained by adding a solution of agonist directly to the fluid in the bath.
Antagonists were added to the bathing media 30 min before the agonist. The antagonists had
no effect on the resting vascular tone. The log concentration-ratio of EC50
values (i.e., concentration producing half-maximum response) in the absence or presence of
antagonist was calculated and plotted against the logarithm of antagonist concentration to
obtain the pA2 values [2].Statistical analysis: Results are expressed as means ± SEM. Statistical
analyses were performed by Student’s t-test or the Bonferroni test after
one-way analysis of variance (Stat View J-4.5, Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley, CA, U.S.A.).
Significance was established when the probability level was equal to or less than 5%.
RESULTS
Responsiveness to ACh, BK, NA, 5-HT, His and Ang II: We generated
concentration-response curves for ACh, BK, NA, 5-HT, His and Ang II using isolated mouse
basilar arteries (Fig. 1). Contractile response was measured under the resting tone of normal artery, whereas
the relaxation response was measured under contraction with U-46619 (a thromboxane
A2 analogue). ACh and BK induced relaxation in a concentration-dependent manner
(Fig. 1B). NA did not induce any changes in the
vascular tone. His and Ang II induced contraction in a concentration-dependent manner. 5-HT
induced infrequent contraction (9 of 36 cases) (Fig.
1A).
Fig. 1.
Responsiveness of isolated mouse basilar artery to angiotensin II (Ang II: ■),
5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT: □), histamine (His: ▲), noradrenaline (NA: ×) [A],
acetylcholine (ACh: ○) and bradykinin (BK: ●) [B]. Relaxation in response to ACh and
BK was investigated under precontraction with U-46619 (10−7 M). Contraction
responses were compared with 60 mM KCl response, and relaxation responses were
compared with 10−4 M SNP response. Absolute values of KCl-induced
contraction and SNP-induced relaxation were 0.038 ± 0.004 g and 0.011 ± 0.002 g,
respectively. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of 8–12 mice.
Responsiveness of isolated mouse basilar artery to angiotensin II (Ang II: ■),
5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT: □), histamine (His: ▲), noradrenaline (NA: ×) [A],
acetylcholine (ACh: ○) and bradykinin (BK: ●) [B]. Relaxation in response to ACh and
BK was investigated under precontraction with U-46619 (10−7 M). Contraction
responses were compared with 60 mM KCl response, and relaxation responses were
compared with 10−4 M SNP response. Absolute values of KCl-induced
contraction and SNP-induced relaxation were 0.038 ± 0.004 g and 0.011 ± 0.002 g,
respectively. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of 8–12 mice.Responsiveness to L-NNA and indomethacin: L-NNA (a NO synthase inhibitor,
10−4 M) induced contraction (13.4 ± 1.8% to 60 mM KCl) under resting tension,
and indomethacin (a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, 10−5 M) induced relaxation (5.8 ±
0.5% to 10−4 M SNP) under contraction with L-NNA.Maximal responses and pEC: Table 1 shows the maximal responses and pEC50 values for the agonists
examined. BK was the most sensitive relaxing agent (pEC50=6.84 ± 0.09) and
induced the most potent maximum relaxation (−65.5 ± 4.3%), whereas Ang II was the most
sensitive contracting agent (pEC50=6.81 ± 0.08) and induced the most potent
maximum contraction (57.9 ± 4.7%) of the mouse basilar artery.
Table 1.
pEC50 values and maximal responses to agonists
Agonists
pEC50
Max (%)
Bradykinin
6.84 ± 0.09
–65.5 ± 4.3a
Acetylcholine
6.76 ± 0.06
–46.4 ± 4.4a
Angiotensin II
6.81 ± 0.08
57.9 ± 4.7b
5-Hydroxytryptamine
6.64 ± 0.10
18.1 ± 2.3b
Histamine
4.58 ± 0.02
41.6 ± 2.4b
Noradrenaline
–
No response
a: Relaxation induced by 10−4 M SNP (0.011 ± 0.002 g) was taken as 100%,
b: Contraction induced by 60 mM KCl (0.038 ± 0.004 g) was taken as 100%, Each point
represents the mean ± SEM of 8–12 mice.
a: Relaxation induced by 10−4 M SNP (0.011 ± 0.002 g) was taken as 100%,
b: Contraction induced by 60 mM KCl (0.038 ± 0.004 g) was taken as 100%, Each point
represents the mean ± SEM of 8–12 mice.Effect of endothelial denudation, L-NNA, atropine, pirenzepine, methoctramine and
pFHHSiD on ACh-induced relaxation: We investigated the effects of endothelial
denudation, L-NNA, atropine, pirenzepine (a M1 receptor antagonist),
methoctramine (a M2 receptor antagonist) and pFHHSiD (a M3 receptor
antagonist) on the concentration-response curve for ACh. Atropine at 10−7 M and
10−6 M shifted the concentration-response curve for ACh to the right and at
10−5 M largely abolished the ACh-induced relaxation (Fig. 2A). The calculated pA2 value for atropine was 8.02 ± 0.06 and its slope was
0.86 ± 0.05, which was not significantly different from unity (Fig. 2C). Figure 2B shows
the effects of endothelial denudation, L-NNA, pirenzepine, methoctramine and pFHHSiD on
ACh-induced relaxation under the contraction induced by U-46619. ACh-induced relaxation was
completely abolished in endothelial denudated artery and significantly inhibited by L-NNA.
None of the three antagonists had any significant effect on the ACh-induced relaxation.
Fig. 2.
Effect of the non-selective muscarinic-antagonist atropine (○, 10−7 M, ■,
10−6 M and □, 10−5 M) on acetylcholine (ACh)-induced
relaxation (●) [A] and effects of the endothelial denudation (▼), L-NNA (♦ ,
10−4 M), M1 receptor antagonist pirenzepine (○,
10−6 M), the M2 receptor antagonist methoctramine
(■,10−6 M) and the M3 receptor antagonist pFHHSiD (□,
10−5 M) on ACh-induced relaxation (●) [B] and Schild plot of atropine [C]
for the isolated mouse basilar artery. The maximum relaxation induced by ACh in the
absence of antagonist was taken as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of 6–10
mice. CR: equieffective ACh concentration ratio [concentration producing 50% maximal
(EC50) in the presence of atropine/EC50 in the absence of
atropine].
Effect of the non-selective muscarinic-antagonist atropine (○, 10−7 M, ■,
10−6 M and □, 10−5 M) on acetylcholine (ACh)-induced
relaxation (●) [A] and effects of the endothelial denudation (▼), L-NNA (♦ ,
10−4 M), M1 receptor antagonist pirenzepine (○,
10−6 M), the M2 receptor antagonist methoctramine
(■,10−6 M) and the M3 receptor antagonist pFHHSiD (□,
10−5 M) on ACh-induced relaxation (●) [B] and Schild plot of atropine [C]
for the isolated mouse basilar artery. The maximum relaxation induced by ACh in the
absence of antagonist was taken as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of 6–10
mice. CR: equieffective ACh concentration ratio [concentration producing 50% maximal
(EC50) in the presence of atropine/EC50 in the absence of
atropine].Effects of endothelial denudation, L-NNA, indomethacin, and B: Endothelial
denudation had completely abolished BK-induced relaxation, and the NO synthase inhibitor
L-NNA partially inhibits it. The cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin had no significant
effect on BK-induced relaxation (Fig. 3A). To characterize the BK receptor subtypes, the arteries were pretreated with
B1 and B2 receptor antagonists. Figure 3B shows the effect of des-Arg9-[Leu8]-BK (a
B1 receptor antagonist) on BK-induced relaxation of the mouse basilar artery.
Des-Arg9-[Leu8]-BK (10−5 M) did not significantly affect
BK-induced relaxation. This figure also shows the effect of HOE140 (a B2 receptor
antagonist) on BK-induced relaxation. HOE140 shifted the BK-induced concentration-response
curve to the right. The calculated pA2 value for HOE140 was 7.53 ± 0.12 and its
slope was 1.03 ± 0.14, which was not significantly different from unity (Fig. 3C).
Fig. 3.
Effects of endothelial denudation (▼), L-NNA (□) (a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor)
and indomethacin (■, 10−5 M, a cycloxygenase inhibitor) on bradykinin
(BK)-induced relaxation (●) [A], effects of the B1 receptor antagonist
des-Arg9-[Leu8]-BK (○, 10−5 M) and the
B2 receptor antagonist HOE140 (■, 10−7 M and □,
10−6 M) on BK-induced relaxation (●) [B] and Schild plot of HOE140 [C]
for the isolated mouse basilar artery. The maximum relaxation induced by BK in the
absence of antagonist was taken as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of 8
mice. CR: see Fig. 2.
Effects of endothelial denudation (▼), L-NNA (□) (a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor)
and indomethacin (■, 10−5 M, a cycloxygenase inhibitor) on bradykinin
(BK)-induced relaxation (●) [A], effects of the B1 receptor antagonist
des-Arg9-[Leu8]-BK (○, 10−5 M) and the
B2 receptor antagonist HOE140 (■, 10−7 M and □,
10−6 M) on BK-induced relaxation (●) [B] and Schild plot of HOE140 [C]
for the isolated mouse basilar artery. The maximum relaxation induced by BK in the
absence of antagonist was taken as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of 8
mice. CR: see Fig. 2.Effect of 5-HT on isolated mouse basilar artery: 5-HT induced
concentration-dependent contraction in 9 of 36 mouse basilar arteries, the second-time 5-HT
response being significantly lower than the first (Fig.
4). Endothelial denudation or inhibition of NO synthase by L-NNA had no effect on this
phenomenon (data not shown).
Fig. 4.
Effect of repeated application of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) on the isolated mouse
basilar artery (●, 1st response, ○, 2nd response). The maximum contraction induced by
the first application of 5-HT was taken as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± SEM
of 9 mice.
Effect of repeated application of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) on the isolated mouse
basilar artery (●, 1st response, ○, 2nd response). The maximum contraction induced by
the first application of 5-HT was taken as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± SEM
of 9 mice.Effects of diphenhydramine and cimetidine on His-induced contraction: We
investigated the effects of diphenhydramine (a H1 receptor antagonist) and
cimetidine (a H2 receptor antagonist) on the concentration-response curve for
His. Diphenhydramine (10−7–10−4 M) shifted the concentration-response
curve for His to the right in parallel; cimetidine (10−5 M) had no significant
effect (Fig. 5A). The calculated pA2 value for diphenhydramine was 6.62 ± 0.11 and its
slope was 0.81 ± 0.19, which was not significantly different from unity (Fig. 5B).
Fig. 5.
Effect of the H1 receptor antagonist diphenhydramine (Δ 10−7 M,
▲ 10−6 M, ■ 10−5 M, □ 10−4 M) and the H2
receptor antagonist cimetidine (○ 10−5 M) on histamine (His)-induced
contraction (●) [A] and Schild plot of diphenhydramine [B] for the isolated mouse
basilar artery. The maximum contraction induced by His in the absence of antagonist
was taken as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of 6–10 mice. CR: see Fig. 2.
Effect of the H1 receptor antagonist diphenhydramine (Δ 10−7 M,
▲ 10−6 M, ■ 10−5 M, □ 10−4 M) and the H2
receptor antagonist cimetidine (○ 10−5 M) on histamine (His)-induced
contraction (●) [A] and Schild plot of diphenhydramine [B] for the isolated mouse
basilar artery. The maximum contraction induced by His in the absence of antagonist
was taken as 100%. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of 6–10 mice. CR: see Fig. 2.Effects of losartan and PD123319 on Ang II-induced contraction: We
examined the effects of losartan (an AT1 receptor antagonist) and PD123319 (an
AT2 receptor antagonist) on the concentration-response curve for Ang II (Fig. 6). Losartan (10−7 and 10−6 M) shifted the concentration-response
curve for Ang II to the right in parallel. The calculated pA2 value for losartan
was 8.12 ± 0.10 and its slope was 0.79 ± 0.03, which was significantly different from unity.
PD123319 had no significant effect.
Fig. 6.
Effect of the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan (■ 10−7 M, Δ
10−6 M) and the AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 (○,
10−6 M) on angiotensin (Ang) II-induced contraction (●) [A] and Schild
plot of losartan [B] in the isolated mouse basilar artery. The maximum contraction
induced by Ang II in the absence of antagonist was taken as 100%. Each point
represents the mean ± SEM of 7 mice. CR: see Fig.
2.
Effect of the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan (■ 10−7 M, Δ
10−6 M) and the AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 (○,
10−6 M) on angiotensin (Ang) II-induced contraction (●) [A] and Schild
plot of losartan [B] in the isolated mouse basilar artery. The maximum contraction
induced by Ang II in the absence of antagonist was taken as 100%. Each point
represents the mean ± SEM of 7 mice. CR: see Fig.
2.
DISCUSSION
To our knowledge, this is the first study to have demonstrated the responsiveness of the
isolated mouse basilar artery to ACh, BK, NA, 5-HT, His and Ang II . Although some of these
vasoactive substances have been investigated by pressure myograph system previously [4], the receptor subtypes have not yet been described.ACh is an endogenous substance producing endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation via NO,
prostacyclin and/or endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). In the present study,
ACh-induced relaxation was completely abolished by endothelial denudation and significantly
inhibited by L-NNA as shown in Fig. 2B. These
results suggested that ACh induces endothelium-dependent and NO-mediated relaxation in mouse
basilar artery. Three types of muscarinic receptors appear to be involved in the relaxation
or contraction of arteries [5], but in the present
study, atropine shifted the concentration-response curve for ACh to the right with a
pA2 value of 8.02 as shown in Fig.
2A. There is no report regarding the pA2 value of atropine in ACh-induced
relaxation on mouse artery or other tissues. But, our calculated pA2 value is
similar to that reported for the rabbit aorta (8.14) [12], but lower than that reported for the rat mesenteric artery (9.78) [29]. The differences might be due to the differences in
artery and species of animals studied. M1, M2 and M3
receptor antagonists had no significant effect. These results differed from those obtained
using chicken basilar arteries, where atropine (non-selective muscarinic receptor
antagonist) and pFHHSiD (selective M3 receptor antagonist), but not pirenzepine
(selective M1 receptor antagonist) and methoctramine (selective M2
receptor antagonist), shifted the concentration-response curve for ACh to the right [15]. Our results suggest that some other receptor
subtypes apart from M1, M2 and M3 receptors might be
responsible for ACh-induced relaxation. Molecular cloning studies have revealed the
existence of five molecularly distinct ACh receptor subtypes (M1-M5)
[6, 30].
Studies of the expression of the cloned M5 receptor gene in cultured mammalian
cells have shown that the encoded receptor protein is functional and efficiently couples to
G proteins of the Gq family, similarly to the M1 and M3 receptor
subtypes [5, 14]. As no M5 antagonist is commercially available, we were unable to
characterize the receptor, although a previous study observed that ACh-mediated dilation of
cerebral arteries and microvessels was virtually abolished in M5
receptor-knockout mice [32].BK induced relaxation of mouse basilar arteries precontracted with U-46619, and this effect
was abolished in arteries after endothelial denudation as shown in Fig. 3A. This result was consistent with the previous findings by
Rosenblum et al.>[21], who used
light-dye or laser-dye techniques to show that cerebral vasodilator responses to BK
in vivo were abolished after injury to endothelial cells in mice.
Pretreatment with L-NNA partially shifted the concentration-response curve for BK to the
right, and indomethacin had no significant effect on it. These results suggest that
BK-induced relaxation might be partly mediated by NO, but not by arachidonic acid
metabolites. Some other EDHF might also be involved in BK-induced relaxation of mouse
basilar artery. The dilative action of BK on small pial arteries is reportedly mediated by
release of hydroxyl radicals in mouse [21] and cat
[13]. In line with this, one previous study has
verified that BK-induced relaxation of human forearm resistance vessels did not involve NO
or a vasodilator prostanoid, this effect being mediated by hyperpolarization of the vascular
wall [11]. Thus, it seems that the vasorelaxing
pathways involved in BK-induced relaxation vary depending on the vascular bed studied. In
the present study, the relaxing effect of BK was significantly inhibited by HOE140, but not
by the B1 receptor antagonist des-Arg9-[Leu8]-BK as shown
in Fig. 3B. These data indicate that the dilative
effect of BK on the mouse basilar artery is mediated by the B2 receptor, and not
by the B1 receptor. B1 receptor-mediated responses are generally not
observed under normal physiological conditions [27].
The calculated pA2 value of HOE140 is 7.53, which is identical to the value for
the human isolated umbilical artery, i.e. 7.50 [1].In the mouse basilar artery, NA had no effect on resting vascular tone. This result was
similar to that obtained by a previous study [7],
which showed that NA had no effect on the rat basilar artery.In mouse basilar artery, 5-HT induced contraction with an intensity of 18.1%, whereas in
most species of animal, the intensity ranges from 40% to 100% [34]. The frequency of 5-HT-induced contraction was 25% among all
experimental cases (9 of 36), and furthermore second-time responses were significantly lower
than the initial ones and absent in some cases. After first application, a possible
desensitization or internalization and/or down regulation of the 5-HT receptor might
interfere second-time responses. A similar phenomenon has been reported in rabbit middle
cerebral artery [23]. Therefore, we were unable to
carry out subsequent experiments to characterize the receptor subtypes involved in the
5-HT-induced contraction. This brings into question the usefulness of the mouse as a model
for studies of migraine and stroke, conditions in which 5-HT is thought to play important
roles [19, 31].The H1 receptor antagonist diphenhydramine shifted the concentration-response
curve for His to the right, whereas the H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine had no
significant effect on the His-induced contraction as shown in Fig. 5A. These results suggest that activation of the H1
receptor induces contraction of the mouse basilar artery. Contraction of resting vascular
tone in response to His has also been reported in guinea pigs [7], pigs [17], humans [22], horses and cattle [18]. The calculated pA2 value for diphenhydramine was 6.62, which is
lower than the values reported for bovine (7.61) and porcine (7.77) basilar arteries [17, 18]. A further
study is needed to clarify the differences in pA2 values among species.The effects of Ang II occur via activation of two receptor subtypes, AT1 and
AT2. The vasocontractile effects of Ang II are generally considered to result
from activation of the AT1 receptor. The selective AT1 receptor
antagonist losartan shifted the concentration-response curve for Ang II to the right,
whereas PD123319 (an AT2 receptor antagonist) had no effect as shown in Fig. 6A. These results suggest that the Ang II-induced
contraction in mouse basilar artery is mediated by activation of AT1 receptors. A
previous study showed that vasoconstriction of the cerebral artery in response to Ang II was
markedly reduced in genetic AT1A-deficient mouse [9]. The calculated pA2 value for losartan is 8.12, which is similar to
that reported in canine mesenteric (8.15) and pulmonary (7.96) artery [10].L-NNA induced contraction and indomethacin induced relaxation through inhibition of NO
synthase and cyclooxygenase, respectively. These results suggest that the resting tone
balance of the mouse basilar artery is also maintained by spontaneous release of NO and
thromboxane A2.Small rodents, such as mice and rats, are frequently used in preclinical cerebrovascular
research, mice being particularly useful, because an increasing number of transgenic models
are becoming available. Mice are often used as small animal models of brain ischemia, venous
thrombosis or vasospasm, and Alzheimer’s disease. The majority of novel therapeutic
approaches are tested in small animal models of human disease, especially those involving
mice, prior to clinical testing. A variety of murine models of cerebrovascular disease are
available, from which a number of molecular and structural elements of cerebral disorders
have been clarified.In summary, we have investigated the responses of the mouse basilar artery to a number of
pharmacological agents that are modulators of cerebrovascular circulation in both normal and
pathophysiological states. We have demonstrated that the mouse basilar artery is responsive
to ACh and BK with relaxation, and to 5-HT, His and Ang II with contraction, but is
unresponsive to NA. These response characteristics are unique to the mouse basilar
artery.
Authors: M Yamada; K G Lamping; A Duttaroy; W Zhang; Y Cui; F P Bymaster; D L McKinzie; C C Felder; C X Deng; F M Faraci; J Wess Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-11-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Robert H Waterston; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Ewan Birney; Jane Rogers; Josep F Abril; Pankaj Agarwal; Richa Agarwala; Rachel Ainscough; Marina Alexandersson; Peter An; Stylianos E Antonarakis; John Attwood; Robert Baertsch; Jonathon Bailey; Karen Barlow; Stephan Beck; Eric Berry; Bruce Birren; Toby Bloom; Peer Bork; Marc Botcherby; Nicolas Bray; Michael R Brent; Daniel G Brown; Stephen D Brown; Carol Bult; John Burton; Jonathan Butler; Robert D Campbell; Piero Carninci; Simon Cawley; Francesca Chiaromonte; Asif T Chinwalla; Deanna M Church; Michele Clamp; Christopher Clee; Francis S Collins; Lisa L Cook; Richard R Copley; Alan Coulson; Olivier Couronne; James Cuff; Val Curwen; Tim Cutts; Mark Daly; Robert David; Joy Davies; Kimberly D Delehaunty; Justin Deri; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Colin Dewey; Nicholas J Dickens; Mark Diekhans; Sheila Dodge; Inna Dubchak; Diane M Dunn; Sean R Eddy; Laura Elnitski; Richard D Emes; Pallavi Eswara; Eduardo Eyras; Adam Felsenfeld; Ginger A Fewell; Paul Flicek; Karen Foley; Wayne N Frankel; Lucinda A Fulton; Robert S Fulton; Terrence S Furey; Diane Gage; Richard A Gibbs; Gustavo Glusman; Sante Gnerre; Nick Goldman; Leo Goodstadt; Darren Grafham; Tina A Graves; Eric D Green; Simon Gregory; Roderic Guigó; Mark Guyer; Ross C Hardison; David Haussler; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; LaDeana W Hillier; Angela Hinrichs; Wratko Hlavina; Timothy Holzer; Fan Hsu; Axin Hua; Tim Hubbard; Adrienne Hunt; Ian Jackson; David B Jaffe; L Steven Johnson; Matthew Jones; Thomas A Jones; Ann Joy; Michael Kamal; Elinor K Karlsson; Donna Karolchik; Arkadiusz Kasprzyk; Jun Kawai; Evan Keibler; Cristyn Kells; W James Kent; Andrew Kirby; Diana L Kolbe; Ian Korf; Raju S Kucherlapati; Edward J Kulbokas; David Kulp; Tom Landers; J P Leger; Steven Leonard; Ivica Letunic; Rosie Levine; Jia Li; Ming Li; Christine Lloyd; Susan Lucas; Bin Ma; Donna R Maglott; Elaine R Mardis; Lucy Matthews; Evan Mauceli; John H Mayer; Megan McCarthy; W Richard McCombie; Stuart McLaren; Kirsten McLay; John D McPherson; Jim Meldrim; Beverley Meredith; Jill P Mesirov; Webb Miller; Tracie L Miner; Emmanuel Mongin; Kate T Montgomery; Michael Morgan; Richard Mott; James C Mullikin; Donna M Muzny; William E Nash; Joanne O Nelson; Michael N Nhan; Robert Nicol; Zemin Ning; Chad Nusbaum; Michael J O'Connor; Yasushi Okazaki; Karen Oliver; Emma Overton-Larty; Lior Pachter; Genís Parra; Kymberlie H Pepin; Jane Peterson; Pavel Pevzner; Robert Plumb; Craig S Pohl; Alex Poliakov; Tracy C Ponce; Chris P Ponting; Simon Potter; Michael Quail; Alexandre Reymond; Bruce A Roe; Krishna M Roskin; Edward M Rubin; Alistair G Rust; Ralph Santos; Victor Sapojnikov; Brian Schultz; Jörg Schultz; Matthias S Schwartz; Scott Schwartz; Carol Scott; Steven Seaman; Steve Searle; Ted Sharpe; Andrew Sheridan; Ratna Shownkeen; Sarah Sims; Jonathan B Singer; Guy Slater; Arian Smit; Douglas R Smith; Brian Spencer; Arne Stabenau; Nicole Stange-Thomann; Charles Sugnet; Mikita Suyama; Glenn Tesler; Johanna Thompson; David Torrents; Evanne Trevaskis; John Tromp; Catherine Ucla; Abel Ureta-Vidal; Jade P Vinson; Andrew C Von Niederhausern; Claire M Wade; Melanie Wall; Ryan J Weber; Robert B Weiss; Michael C Wendl; Anthony P West; Kris Wetterstrand; Raymond Wheeler; Simon Whelan; Jamey Wierzbowski; David Willey; Sophie Williams; Richard K Wilson; Eitan Winter; Kim C Worley; Dudley Wyman; Shan Yang; Shiaw-Pyng Yang; Evgeny M Zdobnov; Michael C Zody; Eric S Lander Journal: Nature Date: 2002-12-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Bruno A Marichal-Cancino; Abimael González-Hernández; Enriqueta Muñoz-Islas; Carlos M Villalón Journal: Curr Neuropharmacol Date: 2020 Impact factor: 7.363
Authors: Ran Wei; Stephen L Gust; David Tandio; Alexia Maheux; Khanh H Nguyen; Joanne Wang; Stephane Bourque; Frances Plane; James R Hammond Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2020-03