Poppy Brown1, Felicity Waite2,3, Daniel Freeman2,3. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Warneford Lane, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK. poppy.brown@psych.ox.ac.uk. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Warneford Lane, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK. 3. Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Parenting behaviours-including the extent to which parents are protective, hostile, or caring-likely impacts whether a child develops a sense of vulnerability that carries forward into adulthood. Ideas of vulnerability are a contributory factor to the occurrence of paranoia. Our aim was to assess whether there is an association between specific parenting behaviours and paranoia. METHOD: We examined cross-sectional associations of parenting and paranoia in an epidemiologically representative cohort of 10,148 adolescents (National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescents; NCS-A) and a second dataset of 1286 adults in Oxfordshire. Further, a network analysis was conducted with paranoia, parenting behaviours, and cognitive-affective variables (compassion, self-esteem, anxiety, and depression). Overprotectiveness, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and amount of care were assessed in mothers and fathers separately. RESULTS: Nearly all parenting variables were significantly associated with paranoia, with parental verbal and physical abuse showing the largest associations. For example, the odds of reporting paranoia was over four times higher for those in the adult sample reporting a lot of paternal verbal abuse, compared to those reporting none (OR = 4.12, p < 0.001, CI 2.47-6.85). Network analyses revealed high interconnectivity between paranoia, parenting behaviours, and cognitive-affective variables. Of the parenting variables, paranoia most strongly interacted with paternal abuse and maternal lack of care. CONCLUSION: There are associations between participants' self-reported experiences of parental behaviours and paranoia. Despite being associated with paranoia, cognitive-affective variables did not appear to mediate the relationship between parenting and paranoia, which is surprising. What might explain the link therefore remains to be determined.
PURPOSE: Parenting behaviours-including the extent to which parents are protective, hostile, or caring-likely impacts whether a child develops a sense of vulnerability that carries forward into adulthood. Ideas of vulnerability are a contributory factor to the occurrence of paranoia. Our aim was to assess whether there is an association between specific parenting behaviours and paranoia. METHOD: We examined cross-sectional associations of parenting and paranoia in an epidemiologically representative cohort of 10,148 adolescents (National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescents; NCS-A) and a second dataset of 1286 adults in Oxfordshire. Further, a network analysis was conducted with paranoia, parenting behaviours, and cognitive-affective variables (compassion, self-esteem, anxiety, and depression). Overprotectiveness, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and amount of care were assessed in mothers and fathers separately. RESULTS: Nearly all parenting variables were significantly associated with paranoia, with parental verbal and physical abuse showing the largest associations. For example, the odds of reporting paranoia was over four times higher for those in the adult sample reporting a lot of paternal verbal abuse, compared to those reporting none (OR = 4.12, p < 0.001, CI 2.47-6.85). Network analyses revealed high interconnectivity between paranoia, parenting behaviours, and cognitive-affective variables. Of the parenting variables, paranoia most strongly interacted with paternal abuse and maternal lack of care. CONCLUSION: There are associations between participants' self-reported experiences of parental behaviours and paranoia. Despite being associated with paranoia, cognitive-affective variables did not appear to mediate the relationship between parenting and paranoia, which is surprising. What might explain the link therefore remains to be determined.
Authors: Daniel Freeman; Philippa A Garety; Paul E Bebbington; Benjamin Smith; Rebecca Rollinson; David Fowler; Elizabeth Kuipers; Katarzyna Ray; Graham Dunn Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Paul E Bebbington; Orla McBride; Craig Steel; Elizabeth Kuipers; Mirjana Radovanovic; Traolach Brugha; Rachel Jenkins; Howard I Meltzer; Daniel Freeman Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: David Fowler; Daniel Freeman; Ben Smith; Elizabeth Kuipers; Paul Bebbington; Hannah Bashforth; Sian Coker; Joanne Hodgekins; Alison Gracie; Graham Dunn; Philippa Garety Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2006-03-27 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Helena M S Zavos; Daniel Freeman; Claire M A Haworth; Philip McGuire; Robert Plomin; Alastair G Cardno; Angelica Ronald Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 21.596