Helena M S Zavos1, Daniel Freeman2, Claire M A Haworth3, Philip McGuire4, Robert Plomin1, Alastair G Cardno5, Angelica Ronald6. 1. Medical Research Council Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, England. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, England. 4. Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, England. 5. Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England. 6. Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, England.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: The onset of psychosis is usually preceded by psychotic experiences (PE). Little is known about the etiology of PE and whether the degree of genetic and environmental influences varies across different levels of severity. A recognized challenge is to identify individuals at high risk of developing psychotic disorders prior to disease onset. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the degree of genetic and environmental influences on specific PE, assessed dimensionally, in adolescents in the community and in those who have many, frequent experiences (defined using quantitative cutoffs). We also assessed the degree of overlap in etiological influences between specific PE. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Structural equation model-fitting, including univariate and bivariate twin models, liability threshold models, DeFries-Fulker extremes analysis, and the Cherny method, was used to analyze a representative community sample of 5059 adolescent twin pairs (mean [SD] age, 16.31 [0.68] years) from England and Wales. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Psychotic experiences assessed as quantitative traits (self-rated paranoia, hallucinations, cognitive disorganization, grandiosity, and anhedonia, as well as parent-rated negative symptoms). RESULTS: Genetic influences were apparent for all PE (15%-59%), with modest shared environment for hallucinations and negative symptoms (17%-24%) and significant nonshared environment (49%-64%) for the self-rated scales and 17% for parent-rated negative symptoms. Three empirical approaches converged to suggest that the etiology in extreme-scoring groups (most extreme scoring: 5%, 10%, and 15%) did not differ significantly from that of the whole distribution. There was no linear change in heritability across the distribution of PE, with the exception of a modest increase in heritability for increasing severity of parent-rated negative symptoms. Of the PE that showed covariation, this appeared to be due to shared genetic influences (bivariate heritabilities, 0.54-0.71). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings are consistent with the concept of a psychosis continuum, suggesting that the same genetic and environmental factors influence both extreme, frequent PE and milder, less frequent manifestations in adolescents. Individual PE in adolescence, assessed quantitatively, have lower heritability estimates and higher estimates of nonshared environment than those for the liability to schizophrenia. Heritability varies by type of PE, being highest for paranoia and parent-rated negative symptoms and lowest for hallucinations.
IMPORTANCE: The onset of psychosis is usually preceded by psychotic experiences (PE). Little is known about the etiology of PE and whether the degree of genetic and environmental influences varies across different levels of severity. A recognized challenge is to identify individuals at high risk of developing psychotic disorders prior to disease onset. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the degree of genetic and environmental influences on specific PE, assessed dimensionally, in adolescents in the community and in those who have many, frequent experiences (defined using quantitative cutoffs). We also assessed the degree of overlap in etiological influences between specific PE. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Structural equation model-fitting, including univariate and bivariate twin models, liability threshold models, DeFries-Fulker extremes analysis, and the Cherny method, was used to analyze a representative community sample of 5059 adolescent twin pairs (mean [SD] age, 16.31 [0.68] years) from England and Wales. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Psychotic experiences assessed as quantitative traits (self-rated paranoia, hallucinations, cognitive disorganization, grandiosity, and anhedonia, as well as parent-rated negative symptoms). RESULTS: Genetic influences were apparent for all PE (15%-59%), with modest shared environment for hallucinations and negative symptoms (17%-24%) and significant nonshared environment (49%-64%) for the self-rated scales and 17% for parent-rated negative symptoms. Three empirical approaches converged to suggest that the etiology in extreme-scoring groups (most extreme scoring: 5%, 10%, and 15%) did not differ significantly from that of the whole distribution. There was no linear change in heritability across the distribution of PE, with the exception of a modest increase in heritability for increasing severity of parent-rated negative symptoms. Of the PE that showed covariation, this appeared to be due to shared genetic influences (bivariate heritabilities, 0.54-0.71). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings are consistent with the concept of a psychosis continuum, suggesting that the same genetic and environmental factors influence both extreme, frequent PE and milder, less frequent manifestations in adolescents. Individual PE in adolescence, assessed quantitatively, have lower heritability estimates and higher estimates of nonshared environment than those for the liability to schizophrenia. Heritability varies by type of PE, being highest for paranoia and parent-rated negative symptoms and lowest for hallucinations.
Authors: Ian Kelleher; Aileen Murtagh; Charlene Molloy; Sarah Roddy; Mary C Clarke; Michelle Harley; Mary Cannon Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2011-11-17 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Gemma Modinos; Conrad Iyegbe; Diana Prata; Margarita Rivera; Matthew J Kempton; Lucia R Valmaggia; Pak C Sham; Jim van Os; Philip McGuire Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: David W Evans; Laina G Lusk; Mylissa M Slane; Andrew M Michael; Scott M Myers; Mirko Uljarević; Oliver Mason; Gordon Claridge; Thomas Frazier Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Antonella Trotta; Louise Arseneault; Avshalom Caspi; Terrie E Moffitt; Andrea Danese; Carmine Pariante; Helen L Fisher Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Iria Mendez; David Axelson; Josefina Castro-Fornieles; Danella Hafeman; Tina R Goldstein; Benjamin I Goldstein; Rasim Diler; Roger Borras; John Merranko; Kelly Monk; Mary Beth Hickey; Boris Birmaher Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2018-11-03 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Joanne B Newbury; Louise Arseneault; Avshalom Caspi; Terrie E Moffitt; Candice L Odgers; Jessie R Baldwin; Helena M S Zavos; Helen L Fisher Journal: Dev Psychopathol Date: 2017-12
Authors: Roman Kotov; Katherine G Jonas; William T Carpenter; Michael N Dretsch; Nicholas R Eaton; Miriam K Forbes; Kelsie T Forbush; Kelsey Hobbs; Ulrich Reininghaus; Tim Slade; Susan C South; Matthew Sunderland; Monika A Waszczuk; Thomas A Widiger; Aidan G C Wright; David H Zald; Robert F Krueger; David Watson Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 49.548