Literature DB >> 32810573

The habitual nature of food purchases at the supermarket: Implications for policy making.

Leandro Machín1, María Rosa Curutchet2, Vanessa Gugliucci3, Agustina Vitola3, Tobias Otterbring4, Marcela de Alcantara5, Gastón Ares6.   

Abstract

Supermarkets have become the most important provider of food products worldwide. However, empirical evidence about how consumers make their food purchase decisions in this environment is still scarce. The present field study aimed to: i) explore how people make their in-store food purchases, and ii) identify the information they search for when making those purchases. Consumers (n = 144) were intercepted when entering the facilities of three supermarkets in two Uruguayan cities. They were asked to wear a mobile eye-tracker while they made their purchases as they normally do. The great majority of the consumers bought at least one food product or beverage (92%) and, on average, examined products from 2.8 sections. In total, they investigated 37 categories within 13 self-service sections, corresponding to 26 categories of ultra-processed products. For 67% of the products, consumers went straight to the product they seemed to be looking for, grabbed it and put it in their shopping basket or cart, without making any comparison among products. A limited information search was observed. On average, consumers spent 22 s examining products within self-service sections and only 6.9 s were elapsed from the moment they grabbed a product until they put it in the shopping cart. These results provide empirical evidence of the habitual nature of supermarket food purchases in a context characterized by wide availability of ultra-processed products. Taken together, the findings suggest that policies and interventions aimed at reducing purchases of ultra-processed products should disrupt habitual decisions at the point of purchase. In this sense, policies targeted at introducing salient changes on food packages hold potential to disrupt food purchases and encourage consumers to establish new and more healthful food purchase habits.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye-tracking; Field study; Habits; Habitual decision-making; Low-involvement products; Nutrition information; Repeat purchase products; Ultra-processed

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32810573     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  5 in total

1.  How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products? Results From a Hypothetical Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Marcela de Alcantara; Gastón Ares; Rosires Deliza
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  Secondary Outcomes of a Front-of-Pack-Labelling Randomised Controlled Experiment in a Representative British Sample: Understanding, Ranking Speed and Perceptions.

Authors:  Jessica Packer; Simon J Russell; Deborah Ridout; Anne Conolly; Curtis Jessop; Russell M Viner; Helen Croker
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.706

3.  Populated Places and Conspicuous Consumption: High Population Density Cues Predict Consumers' Luxury-Linked Brand Attitudes.

Authors:  Tobias Otterbring; Michał Folwarczny; Lynn K L Tan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-01

4.  Active Consideration of Future Health Can Be Prompted by Simple Health Messages and Improves Nutritional Quality of Food Choices.

Authors:  Christopher R Gustafson
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-07-07

5.  "It's All Just Marketing", a Qualitative Analysis of Consumer Perceptions and Understandings of Nutrition Content and Health Claims in New Zealand.

Authors:  Lucy Stuthridge; Donnell Alexander; Maria Stubbe; Paul Eme; Claire Smith
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.