Literature DB >> 32808892

Outcomes of the five times sit-to-stand test could determine lower limb functions of ambulatory people with spinal cord injury only when assessed without hands.

Lalita Khuna1,2, Supaporn Phadungkit1,2, Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij1,2, Pipatana Amatachaya2,3, Sugalya Amatachaya1,2.   

Abstract

Context/
Objectives: Various clinical application of the five times sit-to-stand test (FTSST), with or without hands, may confound the outcomes to determine the lower limb functions and mobility of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). This study assessed the concurrent validity of the FTSST in ambulatory individuals with SCI who completed the test with or without hands as verified using standard measures for lower extremity motor scores (LEMS) and functional mobility necessary for independence and safety of these individuals.Design: Cross-sectional study.Setting: Tertiary rehabilitation centers and community hospitals.Participants: Fifty-six ambulatory individuals with motor incomplete SCI who were able to walk independently with or without a walking device over at least 10 m.Outcome Measures: Time to complete the FTSST with or without hands according to individuals' abilities, LEMS, and functional mobility.
Results: Time to complete the FTSST showed moderate-to-strong correlation with the LEMS scores and all functional mobility tests (ρ = -0.38 to -0.71, P < 0.05), but only in those who performed the test without hands. By contrast, data of those who completed the FTSST with hands were significantly correlated only with the ankle muscle strength and the functional mobility measures that allow upper limb contribution in the tests (ρ = -0.40 to 0.52, P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Upper limb involvement could confound the outcomes of the FTSST. The present findings suggest the use of FTSST without hands to determine the lower limb functions of ambulatory individuals with SCI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balance; Lower limb function; Mobility; Muscle strength; Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32808892      PMCID: PMC9135426          DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1803658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med        ISSN: 1079-0268            Impact factor:   2.040


  26 in total

1.  Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population.

Authors:  E M Andresen; B S Fouts; J C Romeis; C A Brownson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Whole-body movements during rising to standing from sitting.

Authors:  M Schenkman; R A Berger; P O Riley; R W Mann; W A Hodge
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1990-10

3.  5-repetition sit-to-stand test in subjects with chronic stroke: reliability and validity.

Authors:  Yiqin Mong; Tilda W Teo; Shamay S Ng
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): an international multicenter validity and reliability study.

Authors:  J F Ditunno; P L Ditunno; V Graziani; G Scivoletto; M Bernardi; V Castellano; M Marchetti; H Barbeau; H L Frankel; J M D'Andrea Greve; H Y Ko; R Marshall; P Nance
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Influence of timing protocols and distance covered on the outcomes of the 10-meter walk test.

Authors:  Sugalya Amatachaya; Mipattra Kwanmongkolthong; Aungsana Thongjumroon; Nuttaklitta Boonpew; Pipatana Amatachaya; Wilairat Saensook; Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij; Torkamol Hunsawong
Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Reliability and validity of three functional tests in ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  P Poncumhak; J Saengsuwan; W Kamruecha; S Amatachaya
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Ability of walking without a walking device in patients with spinal cord injury as determined using data from functional tests.

Authors:  Puttipong Poncumhak; Jiamjit Saengsuwan; Sugalya Amatachaya
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Sit-to-stand performance depends on sensation, speed, balance, and psychological status in addition to strength in older people.

Authors:  Stephen R Lord; Susan M Murray; Kirsten Chapman; Bridget Munro; Anne Tiedemann
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Five times sit-to-stand test for ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: a psychometric study on the effects of arm placements.

Authors:  Lalita Khuna; Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij; Pattra Wattanapan; Pipatana Amatachaya; Sugalya Amatachaya
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.