Literature DB >> 32808654

Association between ALMS 1 variants and early-onset coronary artery disease: a case-control study in Chinese population.

Shao-Yan Zhang1, Chao Xuan1, Yi Wang1, Shao-Qiang Zhang2, Hui Li1, Guo-Wei He3,4, Qing-Wu Tian1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide linkage analysis revealed the polymorphism of rs6748040 and glutamic acid repeat are potential pathogenic factors of early-onset myocardial infarction (MI). The present study was designed to investigate the associations of Alström syndrome 1 (ALMS 1) gene in Chinese populations with early-onset coronary artery disease (CAD).
METHODS: The two variants of the ALMS 1 gene were genotyped in 1252 early-onset CAD patients and 1378 controls using PCR, followed by Sml I restriction enzyme digestion or direct sequencing of the PCR product. The associations were estimated using the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS: A significant association between the ALMS 1 G/A variant and the risk of early-onset MI was detected in G vs.A (OR = 1.371, 95% CI: 1.183-1.589), GG vs. AA (OR = 2.037, 95% CI: 1.408-2.948), dominant genetic model (OR = 1.794, 95% CI: 1.254-2.567), and recessive genetic model (OR = 1.421, 95% CI: 1.177-1.716). 14 glutamic acid repeat (A14) is risk factor for early-onset MI (OR = 1.605, 95% CI: 1.313-1.962) and 17 glutamic acid repeat (A17) is protective factor for the disease (OR = 0.684, 95% CI: 0.601-0.827). These associations were not detected in early-onset CAD patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that G/A variant (rs6748040) and glutamic acid repeat polymorphism of the ALMS 1 gene associated with the risk of early-onset MI in the Chinese population.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALMS 1; Coronary Artery Disease; Glutamic Acid Repeat; Myocardial Infarction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32808654      PMCID: PMC7463302          DOI: 10.1042/BSR20193637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosci Rep        ISSN: 0144-8463            Impact factor:   3.840


Introduction

Alström syndrome 1 (ALMS 1) gene locates on chromosome 2p13. It contains 23 exons spanning 224 kb of the human genome and encodes a 461.2 kDa protein with 4169 amino acids [1]. The ALMS 1 protein is a centrosome and basal body associated protein that contains a large tandem-repeat domain and functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintenance of cilia [2,3]. ALMS 1 widely expressed in almost all tissues that are pathologically affected in patients with Alström Syndrome (AS) [4]. It is a rare and severe autosomal recessive multisystemic disorder characterized by cone-rod dystrophy, hearing loss, obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dilated cardiomyopathy, and progressive hepatic and renal dysfunction [5,6]. These disorders can also cause serious and even life-threatening problems that affect numerous organ systems including the liver, kidneys, bladder, and lungs. However, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying the multiple organ pathologies have not been fully elucidated. Two common variants of the ALMS 1 gene have been linked with the risk of early-onset myocardial infarction (MI) by genome-wide linkage analysis in the Japanese population [7]. The rs6748040 located in the promoter region of ALMS 1 can affect the gene transcription. Glutamic acid polymorphism in exon 1 could affect the amino acid sequence and function of the protein. According to the principle of genetic diversity, there are differences in genes and phenotypes between different populations due to evolutionary and environmental differences [8,9]. Therefore, it is critical to investigate the associations between the two genetic variations and disease susceptibility in different populations. To our knowledge, there are no studies considering the relationships between common variants of the ALMS 1 gene and the risk of early-onset coronary artery disease (CAD) in Chinese population. In the present study, we aimed to investigate these associations.

Materials and methods

In the present study, we followed the methods previously published by our group [10].

Subjects

In this hospital-based case–control study, all the participants visited The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 2013 and February 2019. A total of 1252 patients who met CAD diagnostic criteria were enrolled in the study when their first onset of symptoms and hospitalization for coronary angiography occurred at age ≤50 years. The diagnosis and severity of CAD were assessed by a cardiologist who used angiographic findings. Patients with other serious illnesses were excluded. The 1378 controls were age and sex-matched who did not show any signs or symptoms of cardiovascular events. All patients and controls included in the study signed informed consent before the start of the study. The Ethics Committee of our hospital approved the study (approval number: 20130036), and the protocol was conformed to the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki declaration of 1975.

Clinical parameters and biochemical measurements

Data on physical examination including smoking and drinking habits, gender, age, height, weight, MI, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were recorded. According to the National Health and Family Planning Commission, the Chinese Dietary Guidelines (2016), drinking habits are defined as men >25 g/d, women >15 g/d, or a history of excessive drinking within 2 weeks (>80 g/d). We define smokers as those who have smoked continuously or cumulatively for 6 months or more in their lifetime. Whole blood was collected by vacuum blood collection without anticoagulant and was centrifuged at 1500 for 15 min. Serum concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), serum creatinine (SCr), fasting blood glucose (FBG), Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), and homocysteine (Hcy) were determined in the morning after fasting of at least 8 h. Serum biochemical indicators were determined using an automatic biochemistry analyzer (Hitachi HCP-7600, Hitachi, Japan) and Series Biochemical Kit (Leadman® Biochemical Co., Ltd, Beijing, China).

DNA isolation and genotyping

Whole blood was collected by vacuum blood collection using an EDTA-K2 anticoagulant. Genomic DNA was isolated by a Blood Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Tianlong Science and Technology, Xi’an, China) according to the instructions using an NP968 Nucleic Acid Extraction System (Tianlong Science and Technology, Xi’an, China), which was based on a magnetic bead separation method. DNA was extracted from 200 μl whole blood and stored at −80°C. Primers were designed by primer premier software (version 6.0, Palo Alto, CA). The primers for the two common variants of the ALMS 1 gene were listed in Table 1. The standard PCR protocols for amplifying targets were as follows: one cycle of 5 min at 94°C, then 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 45 s at 52°C/ 55°C, and 45 s at 72°C, followed by 3 min at 72°C using a GeneAmp PCR machine (Tianlong Science and Technology, Xi’an, China), and the size of PCR amplicon was 642 bp. To detect SNP (rs 6748040), PCR products were digested by Sml I and followed by electrophoresis, the size of restriction digestion products was 377 and 265 bp. PCR products were directly sequenced to determine polymorphism of glutamic acid repeat in Genomic Company (Genewiz Biotechnology, Suzhou, China). The reference sequence obtained from NCBI.
Table 1

The primers of two polymorphisms in ALMS1 gene

Primers
rs 6748040Forward: 5′-GGGTCTGCTAAGGTCAAAT-3′
Reverse: 5′-TCTGTAGGTCACTTCTGGTA-3′
Glutamic acid repeatForward: 5′-GAGCGAGACACCAACATGGA-3′
Reverse: 5′-ATACTTTCCAGATGCTGGGGC-3′

Statistical analysis

An unpaired t-test was used to compare continuous variables, and the χ2 test was used to compare categorical variables. A Q test with one degree of freedom was used to test the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) [11,12]. In genetic models, the contrast of A vs. G, AA vs. GG, dominant genetic model (AA+AG vs. GG), and recessive genetic model (AA vs. AG+GG) was also investigated. The associations between common variants of the ALMS 1 gene and the risk of CAD were estimated using the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI). Adjusted ORs and 95% CIs after adjustment for age, gender, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and biochemical indicators were estimated by logistic regression. Analyses were performed using SPSS software version 11.0, and Stata software version 11.0. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 1252 early-onset CAD patients (mean age 43.88 ± 4.59; 91.70% men) and 1378 controls (mean age 43.63 ± 5.66; 90.85% men) were enrolled in the present study. No significant differences were observed between early-onset CAD patients and controls regarding gender, age, hypertension, and SCr. However, BMI, and levels of FBG, TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, Hcy were significantly elevated in early-onset CAD patients when compared with controls. Besides, the patient group had higher diabetes, and drinking rate compared with controls. In the early-onset CAD patients group, 636 patients were diagnosed with MI. The clinical characteristics of all participants are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

Demographic and clinical characteristics of EOCAD patients and controls

VariableEOCAD (n=1252)Control (n=1378)P-value
Gender, male n (%) #1148 (91.70)1252 (90.85)0.448
Age, years *43.88 ± 4.5943.63 ± 5.660.216
BMI (kg/m2) *26.28 ± 4.3525.75 ± 5.340.006
Hypertension, n (%) #353 (28.20)347 (25.20)0.081
Diabetes, n (%) #234 (18.70)124 (9.00)<0.001
Smoking, n (%) #517 (41.30)525 (38.1)0.094
Drinking, n (%) #760 (60.70)645 (46.80)<0.001
FBG, mmol/l *5.88 ± 2.125.51 ± 1.96<0.001
TG, mmol/l *1.82 ± 1.731.61 ± 1.46<0.001
TC, mmol/l *4.68 ± 1.434.07 ± 1.55<0.001
HDL-C, mmol/l *2.09 ± 1.262.37 ± 1.65<0.001
LDL-C, mmol/l *2.65 ± 1.282.42 ± 1.02<0.001
SCr, μmol/l *83.63 ± 18.7683.48 ± 15.630.823
Hcy, μmol/l *19.28 ± 6.4812.77 ± 5.12< 0.001
Myocardial infarction, n (%)636 (50.80)

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; EOCAD, early-onset coronary artery disease; FBG, fasting blood glucose; Hcy, homocysteine; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SCr, serum creatinine; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.

Categorical variables are expressed as percentages. The P-value of the categorical variables was calculated by χ2 test.

Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD. The P-value of the continuous variables was calculated by the unpaired t test.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; EOCAD, early-onset coronary artery disease; FBG, fasting blood glucose; Hcy, homocysteine; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SCr, serum creatinine; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride. Categorical variables are expressed as percentages. The P-value of the categorical variables was calculated by χ2 test. Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD. The P-value of the continuous variables was calculated by the unpaired t test. The exon–intron structure of the ALMS 1 gene was shown in Figure 1. The G/A variant of the ALMS 1 gene (rs6748040) was genotyped in all 2630 participants (Table 3). The agarose gel images of PCR and restriction digestion were shown in Figure 2. The distributions of genotype in controls, early-onset CAD, and early-onset MI groups were compatible with HWE (PControls = 0.189, PEOCAD = 0.176, and PEOMI = 0.696). Significant associations between the ALMS 1 G/A variant (rs6748040) and the risk of early-onset MI were detected in G vs. A (OR = 1.371, 95% CI: 1.183–1.589), GG vs. AA (OR = 2.037, 95% CI: 1.408–2.948), dominant genetic model (OR = 1.794, 95% CI: 1.254–2.567), and recessive genetic model (OR = 1.421, 95% CI: 1.177–1.716). After adjusting confounding factors, including age, gender, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and biochemical indicators, the allele A was also identified as an independent risk factor for early-onset MI (ORadjust = 1.361, 95% CI: 1.172–1.577, Padjust = 4.688 e-5). However, we did not detect any associations between the variant and risk of early-onset CAD. The detailed results are shown in Table 4.
Figure 1

The exon–intron structure of the ALMS1 gene

Exons are shown as black boxes and two variants (rs6748040 and glutamic acid repeat) are indicated by arrows.

Table 3

Genotype frequencies of ALMS1 gene (rs 6748040) in patient and control groups

GroupsGenotypeHWEAllele
GGGAAAGA
EOCAD711453880.1761875629
EOMI303275580.696881391
Controls777528730.1892082674

Abbreviations: EOCAD, early-onset coronary artery disease; EOMI, early-onset myocardial infarction; HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.

Figure 2

PCR restricted fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) agarose gel electrophoresis of the ALMS 1 G/A polymorphism (rs6748040)

The 100bp DNA Ladder Marker and restriction digestion products by Sml I were separated in 2% agarose gel. The length of the PCR product that was not digested by Sml I was 642bp, while the length of the PCR products that were completely digested by Sml I was 377bp and 265bp. The PCR products partially digested by Sml I appeared as three fragments (642bp, 377bp, and 265bp).

Table 4

The results of ALMS1 gene polymorphism (rs 6748040) and early-onset MI risk

ALMS1 gene polymorphism (rs 6748040)
OR (95% CI)zPOR adjust (95% CI)zP adjust
Early-onset coronary artery disease
  G vs. A1.036 (0.914–-1.175)0.560.5771.028 (0.903–1.162)0.430.668
  GG vs. AA1.317 (0.950–1.826)1.650.0981.306 (0.938–1.816)1.580.113
  Dominant genetic model1.352 (0.981–1.862)1.840.0651.336 (0.973–1.846)1.770.076
  Recessive genetic model0.984 (0.843–1.148)0.210.8350.991 (0.852–1.158)0.120.908
Early-onset myocardial infarction
  G vs. A1.371 (1.183–1.589)4.192.790 e-51.361 (1.172–1.577)4.074.688 e-5
  GG vs. AA2.037 (1.408–2.948)3.781.568 e-42.024 (1.394–2.935)3.712.054 e-4
  Dominant genetic model1.794 (1.254–2.567)3.201.000 e-31.780 (1.241–2.555)3.131.748 e-3
  Recessive genetic model1.421 (1.177–1.716)3.652.622 e-41.406 (1.160–1.702)3.484.939 e-4

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Adjust confounding factors including age, gender, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and biochemical indicators.

The exon–intron structure of the ALMS1 gene

Exons are shown as black boxes and two variants (rs6748040 and glutamic acid repeat) are indicated by arrows.

PCR restricted fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) agarose gel electrophoresis of the ALMS 1 G/A polymorphism (rs6748040)

The 100bp DNA Ladder Marker and restriction digestion products by Sml I were separated in 2% agarose gel. The length of the PCR product that was not digested by Sml I was 642bp, while the length of the PCR products that were completely digested by Sml I was 377bp and 265bp. The PCR products partially digested by Sml I appeared as three fragments (642bp, 377bp, and 265bp). Abbreviations: EOCAD, early-onset coronary artery disease; EOMI, early-onset myocardial infarction; HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. Adjust confounding factors including age, gender, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and biochemical indicators. We detected glutamic acid repeats (13–22 amino acid) consisting of a common structure of (GAG)nGAA(GAG)3. A14 (26.49% in controls) and A17 (49.78% in controls) were the frequent alleles in the glutamic acid repeats of the ALMS 1 gene (Table 5). The typical image of the sequencing result was shown in Figure 3. The distributions of glutamic acid repeat in all participants were list in Table 4. The allele frequency for A14 was increased in patients with early-onset MI compared with controls (OR = 1.605, 95% CI: 1.313–1.962). After adjusting confounding factors, including age, gender, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and biochemical indicators, the association remains (ORadjust = 1.599, 95% CI: 1.306–1.953). On the contrary, A17 allele frequency was decreased in early-onset MI patients, it was considered as a protective factor (OR = 0.684, 95% CI: 0.565–0.827). The results are consistent after logistic regression analysis (ORadjust = 0.687, 95% CI: 0.570–0.832). The detailed results are shown in Table 6.
Table 5

Glutamic acid repeat variant frequency of of ALMS1 gene in patients and control groups

AllelesFrequency
EOCAD (%)EOMI (%)Controls (%)
A133 (0.24%)1 (0.16)2 (0.15)
A14369 (29.47)233 (36.64)365 (26.49)
A1529 (2.32)13 (2.04)39 (2.83)
A1695 (7.59)57 (8.96)91 (6.60)
A17594 (47.44)257 (40.41)686 (49.78)
A1896 (7.67)45 (7.08)112 (8.13)
A1924 (1.92)12 (1.89)27 (1.96)
A2040 (3.19)18 (2.83)52 (3.77)
A212 (0.16%)3 (0.22)
A221 (0.07)
Short*496304497

Abbreviations: EOCAD, early-onset coronary artery disease; EOMI, early-onset myocardial infarction.

Figure 3

The typical sequence chromatogram of glutamic acid repeats (A14) in exon 1 of ALMS 1 gene

Table 6

The results of glutamic acid repeat variant and early-onset coronary artery disease risk

Early-onset coronary artery diseaseEarly-onset myocardial infarction
OR (95% CI)zPOR adjust (95% CI)zP adjustOR (95% CI)zPOR adjust (95% CI)zP adjust
A141.160 (0.978–1.375)1.700.0881.153 (0.970–1.366)1.630.1031.605 (1.313–1.962)4.614.027 e-61.599 (1.306–1.953)4.574.819 e-6
A150.814 (0.500–1.325)0.830.4080.821 (0.508–1.334)0.800.4230.716 (0.380–1.352)1.030.3030.724 (0.388–1.361)1.010.313
A161.161 (0.862–1.565)0.980.3261.152 (0.852–1.554)0.920.3561.392 (0.986–1.966)1.880.0601.384 (0.976–1.955)1.830.067
A170.911 (0.781–1.061)1.200.2310.920 (0.791–1.070)1.080.2790.684 (0.565–0.827)3.919.230 e-50.687 (0.570–0.832)3.899.973e-5
A180.939 (0.707–1.247)0.440.6620.949 (0.716–1.258)0.360.7160.861 (0.601–1.233)0.820.4130.870 (0.612–1.241)0.770.440
A190.978 (0.561–1.704)0.080.9370.986 (0.571–1.715)0.050.9600.962 (0.484–1.912)0.110.9130.971 (0.492–1.922)0.080.933
A200.842 (0.553–1.280)0.810.4200.849 (0.561–1.290)0.770.4400.743 (0.431–1.280)1.070.2840.749 (0.439–1.288)1.050.293
Short *1.163 (0.993–1.362)1.870.0611.152 (0.980–1.351)1.730.0841.623 (1.342–1.964)4.986.358 e-71.618 (1.335–1.955)4.947.619 e-7

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Adjust confounding factors including age, gender, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and biochemical indicators.

Alleles were 9–16 glutamic acid repeat.

Abbreviations: EOCAD, early-onset coronary artery disease; EOMI, early-onset myocardial infarction. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. Adjust confounding factors including age, gender, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and biochemical indicators. Alleles were 9–16 glutamic acid repeat.

Discussion

This is the first large population-based case–control study investigating common variations of the ALMS 1 gene and early-onset CAD in the Chinese population. In the present study, we demonstrated that the G/A variant (rs6748040) of the ALMS 1 promoter region and glutamic acid repeat polymorphism of exon 1 was closely related to the risk of early-onset MI in the Chinese population. However, we found no evidence of associations between these two variations of the ALMS 1 gene and early-onset CAD. ALMS 1 gene located on chromosome 2p13.1, encoding a protein of 4169 amino acids. The ALMS 1 protein is widely expressed in various tissues of human beings, but its function is still unknown. Fibroblasts with ALMS 1 mutation continue to proliferate and secrete high levels of the extracellular matrix. This may be an important pathological mechanism for the formation of fibrous plaque in the coronary arteries and the development of atherosclerosis, ultimately leading to CAD, especially MI. It is already clear that ALMS 1 gene mutations are closely related to AS and is the pathogenic gene of the disease. Although functional studies of ALMS 1 may provide insight into how variants of this gene to produce its pathological effects, the function of the gene has not been fully elucidated. This gene encodes an ALMS 1 protein which is a component of the centrosome [13]. Recent studies suggested that it is involved in microtubule organization and intracellular transport [14,15]. AS is a multi-system disease, mainly characterized by rod-cone retinal degeneration and dilated cardiomyopathy with heart failure in infancy [16]. AS also produces many metabolic abnormalities, such as adolescent obesity with hypertriglyceridemia, liver steatosis, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus [17-19]. It would be expected that AS patients could develop early-onset CAD. Coincidentally, the ALMS 1 gene was identified as a genetic risk marker for early-onset MI by genome-wide linkage analysis in the Japanese population in 2013 [7]. Genome-wide affected sib-pair linkage study in 221 Japanese families with early-onset CAD linked the chromosome 2p13 and early-onset MI. The ALMS 1 gene is the candidate gene within the linkage region. Subsequent analysis in 2186 Japanese patients with MI and 6026 controls proved that a strong association between rs6748040 and early-onset MI. Besides, glutamic acid repeat polymorphism in exon 1 of the ALMS 1 gene has also been proved to be an important risk factor for early-onset MI. Worldwide, CAD remains the leading cause of death and disability. Early-onset CAD affects young and middle-aged individuals and is more harmful than conventional CAD. There is no clear age range for early-onset CAD, but many studies have limited it to under 50 years of age. As a special type of CAD, early-onset CAD has particular components of etiology, including family heredity, lipid metabolism, gender composition, and other risk factors. In our previous studies, we demonstrated that asymmetric dimethylarginine, uric acid, and homocysteine associated with the presence and severity of early-onset CAD [10,20,21]. Familial aggregation strongly indicated the presence of genetic factors for increased susceptibility to the disease. Our findings also indicated that abnormal lipid metabolism and genetic factors may play more important roles in the pathogenesis of early-onset CAD [22,23]. To our knowledge, no study has been described on ALMS 1 gene variants (rs6748040 and glutamic acid repeat polymorphism) and early-onset CAD risk in the Chinese population. According to the principle of genetic diversity, differences in genes and phenotypes between races result from differences in evolution and environment. Therefore, it is critical to study these associations in the Chinese population. In the present study, we evaluated the associations between the two variants of the ALMS 1 gene (rs6748040 and glutamic acid repeat polymorphism) and the risk of early-onset CAD in 1252 early-onset CAD patients and 1378 controls. We confirmed that the ALMS1 G/A variant (rs6748040) was significantly related to an increased risk of early-onset MI, and individuals carrying allele G have a significantly increased risk of the disease (ORadjust = 1.361, 95% CI: 1.172–1.577; P = 4.688 e-5). In addition, 14 glutamic acid repeat (A14) is risk factor for early-onset MI (ORadjust = 1.599, 95% CI: 1.306–1.953; P=4.819 e-6). On the contrary, 17 glutamic acid repeat (A17) is protective factor for the disease (ORadjust = 0.687, 95% CI: 0.570–0.832; P=9.973 e-5). No associations were detected between the two variants and the risk of early-onset CAD. Our study has some limitations. First, although we selected gender- and age-matched individuals without signs or symptoms of CAD as the control group, it should be noted that the controls did not undergo angiography. Second, geographic variations in the prevalence of ALMS 1 variants in the Chinese population may bias the results of the single-center case–control studies. Third, there is always a controversy about which confounding factors should be used for multivariate analysis. One suggested that all differential confounding factors should be used for correction. The other is that all confounding factors should be used for correction. In our previous studies, we tended to use the second approach. In fact, no matter which method is used, the results will basically not change significantly. In conclusion, we observed that the two variants of the ALMS 1 gene were significantly associated with the risk of early-onset MI. However, the specific molecular pathological mechanism needs to be clarified in the following studies.
  23 in total

1.  Proteomic characterization of the human centrosome by protein correlation profiling.

Authors:  Jens S Andersen; Christopher J Wilkinson; Thibault Mayor; Peter Mortensen; Erich A Nigg; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The evolution of phenotypic polymorphism: randomized strategies versus evolutionary branching.

Authors:  Olof Leimar
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Alström Syndrome: Mutation Spectrum of ALMS1.

Authors:  Jan D Marshall; Jean Muller; Gayle B Collin; Gabriella Milan; Stephen F Kingsmore; Darrell Dinwiddie; Emily G Farrow; Neil A Miller; Francesca Favaretto; Pietro Maffei; Hélène Dollfus; Roberto Vettor; Jürgen K Naggert
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 4.878

4.  Alms1-disrupted mice recapitulate human Alström syndrome.

Authors:  G B Collin; E Cyr; R Bronson; J D Marshall; E J Gifford; W Hicks; S A Murray; Q Y Zheng; R S Smith; P M Nishina; J K Naggert
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  New Alström syndrome phenotypes based on the evaluation of 182 cases.

Authors:  Jan D Marshall; Roderick T Bronson; Gayle B Collin; Anne D Nordstrom; Pietro Maffei; Richard B Paisey; Catherine Carey; Seamus Macdermott; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; Sarah E Shea; Judy Davis; Sebastian Beck; Gocha Shatirishvili; Cristina Maria Mihai; Maria Hoeltzenbein; Giovanni Battista Pozzan; Ian Hopkinson; Nicola Sicolo; Jürgen K Naggert; Patsy M Nishina
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-03-28

6.  Screening and Identification of Pregnancy Zone Protein and Leucine-Rich Alpha-2-Glycoprotein as Potential Serum Biomarkers for Early-Onset Myocardial Infarction using Protein Profile Analysis.

Authors:  Chao Xuan; Hui Li; Le-Le Li; Qing-Wu Tian; Qing Wang; Bei-Bei Zhang; Jun-Jie Guo; Guo-Wei He; Li-Min Lun
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Mutations in ALMS1 cause obesity, type 2 diabetes and neurosensory degeneration in Alström syndrome.

Authors:  Gayle B Collin; Jan D Marshall; Akihiro Ikeda; W Venus So; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; Pietro Maffei; Sebastian Beck; Cornelius F Boerkoel; Nicola Sicolo; Mitchell Martin; Patsy M Nishina; Jürgen K Naggert
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-04-08       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Alström syndrome: genetics and clinical overview.

Authors:  Jan D Marshall; Pietro Maffei; Gayle B Collin; Jürgen K Naggert
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.236

Review 9.  ALMS1 and Alström syndrome: a recessive form of metabolic, neurosensory and cardiac deficits.

Authors:  Tom Hearn
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Subcellular localization of ALMS1 supports involvement of centrosome and basal body dysfunction in the pathogenesis of obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Tom Hearn; Cosma Spalluto; Victoria J Phillips; Glenn L Renforth; Nane Copin; Neil A Hanley; David I Wilson
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.461

View more
  1 in total

1.  Serum fatty acids profile and association with early-onset coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Chao Xuan; Qing-Wu Tian; Hui Li; Jun-Jie Guo; Guo-Wei He; Li-Min Lun
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 5.091

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.