Literature DB >> 32808493

Incidence and clinical course of septic shock in neutropenic patients during chemotherapy for gynecological cancers.

Jigeun Yoo1, Yuyeon Jung1, Jung Hwan Ahn1, Youn Jin Choi1, Keun Ho Lee1, Sooyoung Hur2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the incidence and clinical course of septic shock combined with neutropenia during chemotherapy in gynecological cancer patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all gynecological cancer patients who received intravenous chemotherapy between March 2009 and March 2018. Patients diagnosed with neutropenic septic shock (NSS) during the course of chemotherapy were identified. We calculated the overall incidence and mortality rate of NSS, and analyzed risk factors and clinical course.
RESULTS: A total of 1,009 patients received 10,239 cycles of chemotherapy during the study period. Among these, 30 (3.0%) patients had 32 NSS events, of which 12 (1.2%) died. With respect to patient age during the first course of chemotherapy, the incidence of NSS after the age of 50 was significantly higher than that in patients under 50 (3.9% vs. 1.4%, p=0.034). As the number of chemotherapy courses increased, the incidence of NSS increased, and linear-by-linear association analysis showed a positive correlation (p=0.004). NSS events occurred on average 7.8 days after the last cycle of chemotherapy, and the median duration of vasopressor administration was 23.3 hours. The median age (64.0 vs. 56.5, p=0.017) and peak heart rate (149.5 min-1 vs. 123.5 min-1, p=0.015) were significantly higher in the group of patients who subsequently died of NSS than in those who survived.
CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of NSS in gynecological cancer patients receiving chemotherapy was 3.0%, which is higher than previously estimated. Peak heart rate during NSS events may be an indicator for predicting survival.
Copyright © 2020. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant Chemotherapy; Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia; Gynecologic Neoplasms; Septic Shock

Year:  2020        PMID: 32808493      PMCID: PMC7440980          DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 2005-0380            Impact factor:   4.401


INTRODUCTION

In Korea, a total of 8,288 patients were diagnosed with cervical, ovarian, or endometrial cancer in 2015, and the absolute overall incidence of these major gynecologic cancers is increasing year by year [1]. Chemotherapy is used as a standard treatment for various gynecological malignancies [234], and has led to increased survival and reduced recurrence in gynecological cancer patients. Conversely, chemotherapy often causes myelosuppression, resulting in an increased risk of neutropenia and infection, which are the main associated complications [5678]. These complications can also occur in patients with a longer life expectancy, such as those with complete remission status, and can directly lead to death [9]. Moreover, these complications can affect long-term survival by causing dose reduction and treatment delays [1011]. The mortality rate of febrile neutropenia in solid tumors is reported to be approximately 8% [810], and septic shock, which is the most serious complication, has a mortality rate as high as 40% [1213]. Roughly 10% of all cancer patients die from sepsis. The risk of sepsis is higher in patients with hematologic malignancies and relatively lower in those with gynecological cancers [14]. It is estimated that less than 1% of gynecological cancer patients who receive chemotherapy die from septic shock [2141516]; however, the exact figures are unknown, since very few studies have focused on septic shock in gynecological cancers, especially during the treatment of relapse cases. This renders it difficult for clinicians to select the optimal individualized patient treatment and to successfully prevent or treat chemotherapy-related septic shock. The present study was conducted with a view to identifying the incidence and clinical course of septic shock combined with neutropenia during chemotherapy in gynecological cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (KC19RESI0512). We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all gynecological cancer patients over 18 years of age who received intravenous chemotherapy between March 2009 and March 2018 at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy and intraperitoneal chemotherapy were not included in this study. Patients diagnosed with septic shock combined with neutropenia during the course of chemotherapy or within 4 weeks of the last cycle were identified. Neutropenia was defined as a decrease in the absolute neutrophil count <500/μL or <1,000/μL and a predicted decline to <500/μL over the subsequent 48 hours [1718]. Sepsis is defined as a dysregulated host response to infection and the presence of organ dysfunction, as presented by an increase in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 2 points or more [12]. Septic shock was defined as the presence of sepsis and hypotension that required vasopressors despite adequate volume resuscitation [1219]. Events of septic shock with other accompanying causes of hypotension, such as hepatic failure, aspiration pneumonia, and gastrointestinal or intra-abdominal bleeding, were excluded. Moreover, patients who received vasopressors without proper initial fluid resuscitation were also excluded [20]. We defined neutropenic septic shock (NSS) as a combination of the aforementioned neutropenia and septic shock. All patients diagnosed with NSS were admitted to the intensive care unit and treated with initial fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, according to clinical practice guidelines [182021]. We obtained patient characteristics including age, body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, primary cancer site, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage from the medical records. We also retrieved treatment data for each patient, including chemotherapy regimens, the number of courses and cycles of chemotherapy, and the occurrence and timing of NSS. The course of chemotherapy is defined as a treatment plan consisting of several consecutive chemotherapy cycles, until the treatment is completed, stopped, or changed due to the progression of disease. Patients diagnosed with NSS were further examined for vital signs, laboratory findings, underlying diseases, past history of neutropenic fever, relapse and metastasis status, and duration of vasopressor administration. The primary outcome was the overall incidence and mortality rate of NSS. The secondary outcome was to identify the clinical course of NSS.

1. Statistical analysis

We conducted Fisher's exact test and the χ2 test to determine the difference in NSS incidence according to clinical characteristics in gynecological cancer patients who received chemotherapy. The Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney test were performed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of NSS survivors and non-survivors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the risk factors of NSS occurrence and survival. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off values for factors associated with death from NSS. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

A total of 1,009 patients received 10,239 cycles of chemotherapy during the study period. Among these, 30 (3.0%) patients had 32 NSS events, of which 12 (1.2%) died. The mortality rate of NSS was 37.5%. Two patients each had 2 NSS events during different chemotherapy regimens. Five patients died of unknown causes outside of the hospital during their chemotherapy course. A summary of the patients included in the present study can be found in Table 1.
Table 1

Summary of the study group

VariablesWithout NSS (n=979)With NSS (n=30)p-value
Age at the first chemotherapy (yr)53.0 (18.0–87.0)57.0 (29.0–78.0)0.045
<50356 (36.4)5 (16.7)0.032
50–59340 (34.7)15 (50.0)0.119
60–69203 (20.7)5 (16.7)0.819
≥7080 (8.2)5 (16.7)0.100
Body mass index (kg/m2)22.3 (13.6–38.4)23.3 (17.3–30.1)0.346
Medical comorbidities
Hypertension121 (12.4)3 (10.0)>0.999
Diabetes106 (10.8)3 (10.0)>0.999
Cancer site0.547
Ovary549 (56.1)16 (53.3)
Cervix193 (19.7)6 (20.0)
Endometrium118 (12.1)6 (20.0)
Primary peritoneal64 (6.5)1 (3.3)
Uterine corpus35 (3.6)1 (3.3)
Other20 (2.0)0
FIGO cancer stage at diagnosis0.128
I–II367 (37.5)7 (23.3)
III–IV612 (62.5)23 (76.7)
Total No. of chemotherapy received0.001
One course553 (55.6)8 (26.7)
Two or more courses426 (44.4)22 (73.3)

All values are expressed as the median (range) or number (%).

Numbers marked in bold indicate p-values less than 0.05, which is considered statistically significant.

FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; NSS, neutropenic septic shock.

All values are expressed as the median (range) or number (%). Numbers marked in bold indicate p-values less than 0.05, which is considered statistically significant. FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; NSS, neutropenic septic shock. The most common chemotherapy regimen was carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 5) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), which was administered to 626 patients. Nine (1.44%) of these patients developed NSS. The incidence of NSS for various chemotherapy regimens is summarized in Table 2 and Supplementary Table 1.
Table 2

Incidence of NSS according to chemotherapy regimen

RegimenPatientsCoursesCyclesEvents of NSS
Carboplatin/paclitaxel6267164,0729 (1.44)
Carboplatin/docetaxel1711961,1025 (2.92)
Adriamycin/cisplatin88904104 (4.55)
Single topotecan79834132 (2.53)
Cisplatin/paclitaxel71774191 (1.41)
Cisplatin/topotecan69692352 (2.90)
Cisplatin/docetaxel52633423 (5.77)
Single belotecan45452491 (2.22)
Single vinorelbine weekly35351401 (2.86)
Cisplatin/ifosfamide28311291 (3.57)
Bevacizumab/paclitaxel/cisplatin16171061 (6.25)
Bevacizumab/paclitaxel/carboplatin88501 (12.50)
Topotecan/ifosfamide56261 (20.00)

Values are expressed as number (%). Each percentage represents the number of NSS events among the total number of patients.

NSS, neutropenic septic shock.

Values are expressed as number (%). Each percentage represents the number of NSS events among the total number of patients. NSS, neutropenic septic shock.

1. Univariate and multivariate analysis

Table 3 presents the results of the univariate and multivariate analyses. With respect to patient age at the initiation of the first course of chemotherapy, the incidence of NSS after the age of 50 was significantly higher than that in patients under 50 (3.9% vs. 1.4%, p=0.034). This difference was also statistically significant in the multivariate analysis (p=0.031). A total of 561 patients received only one course of chemotherapy, 8 of which developed NSS. Patients who had 2 or more courses of chemotherapy showed a significantly higher incidence of NSS as compared with those who received only one course (4.9% vs. 1.4%, p=0.002). Regarding the cancer site, the incidence of NSS was 2.8% in patients with ovarian cancer, 3.0% in those with cervical cancer, and 4.8% in those with endometrial cancer, with no statistically significant differences. Concerning FIGO stage, patients with stages III–IV at initial diagnosis showed a higher incidence of NSS as compared with those with stages I–II; however, this difference was not statistically significant (3.6% vs. 1.9%, p=0.128).
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression of associated factors

FactorsNSS/total%UnivariateMultivariate
RR (95% CI)p-valueRR (95% CI)p-value
Age at the first chemotherapy (yr)
<505/3611.4ReferenceReference
≥5025/6483.92.86 (1.08–7.53)0.0342.96 (1.12–7.82)0.029
Medical comorbidities
Hypertension3/1242.40.79 (0.24–2.64)0.699--
Diabetes3/1092.80.92 (0.28–3.07)0.886--
Cancer site
Ovary cancer16/5652.8Reference
Cervical cancer6/1993.01.07 (0.41–2.77)0.894--
Endometrial cancer6/1244.81.75 (0.67–4.55)0.255--
Other2/1211.70.57 (0.13–2.54)0.549--
FIGO Cancer stage at diagnosis
I–II7/3741.9Reference
III–IV23/6353.61.97 (0.84–4.64)0.120--
Total No. of chemotherapy received
One course8/5641.4ReferenceReference
Two or more courses22/4454.93.57 (1.57–8.10)0.0023.65 (1.61–8.30)0.002

Numbers marked in bold indicate p-values less than 0.05, which is considered statistically significant.

CI, confidence interval; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; NSS, neutropenic septic shock; RR, relative risk.

Numbers marked in bold indicate p-values less than 0.05, which is considered statistically significant. CI, confidence interval; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; NSS, neutropenic septic shock; RR, relative risk.

2. Incidence of NSS according to the number of chemotherapy courses

Fig. 1 summarizes the incidence of NSS according to the number of chemotherapy courses. During the first course of chemotherapy, patients received an average of 5.5 cycles, with an NSS incidence of 1.3% (11/872) and an NSS-related mortality rate of 0.7%. During the second or higher courses of chemotherapy, patients received an average of 12.1 cycles, with an NSS incidence of 4.5% and an NSS-related mortality rate of 1.3%. As the number of chemotherapy courses increased, the incidence of NSS increased, and linear-by-linear association analysis showed a positive correlation (p=0.004). A total of 8.7% of patients received only 2 or fewer cycles during their first course of chemotherapy due to refusal of further treatment or transfer to another hospital. Even excluding these patients, a positive correlation between the number of chemotherapy courses and the incidence of NSS was maintained (p=0.035).
Fig. 1

Incidence of NSS for each chemotherapy course. A positive correlation was found between the number of chemotherapy courses and the incidence of NSS (linear-by-linear association analysis, p=0.004).

NSS, neutropenic septic shock.

Incidence of NSS for each chemotherapy course. A positive correlation was found between the number of chemotherapy courses and the incidence of NSS (linear-by-linear association analysis, p=0.004).

NSS, neutropenic septic shock.

3. Clinical course of NSS events

Table 4 demonstrates a comparison of the clinical characteristics of NSS events based on survival. NSS events occurred on average 7.8 days after the last cycle of chemotherapy, with all events occurring within 14 days. In the univariate analysis, median age (64.0 vs. 56.5, p=0.017), initial heart rate (122.5 min−1 vs. 112.0 min−1, p=0.039), and peak heart rate during the events (149.5 min−1 vs. 123.5 min−1, p=0.002) were significantly higher in the group of patients who subsequently died. In the multivariate analysis, age (p=0.017) and peak heart rate (p=0.015) were identified as risk factors for death from NSS. ROC curve analysis was performed for the peak heart rate (Supplementary Fig. 1). The AUC was 0.82 (95% confidence interval=0.66–0.97; sensitivity and specificity 83.3% and 75.0%, respectively; p=0.003) and the optimal cut-off value was 141.0 min−1. The median duration of vasopressor administration was 23.3 hours in total, 38.0 hours in the group of patients who survived and 20.9 hours in the group of patients who subsequently died (p=0.036). The peak body temperature, hemoglobin level at NSS diagnosis, lowest neutrophil count, and highest C-reactive protein and creatinine levels did not differ between the 2 groups. One patient who subsequently died had hypothermia, and one who subsequently died and 2 who survived had normothermia. Pathogens were identified in 56.3% of blood cultures and 37.5% of urine cultures. The identified pathogens are summarized in Table 5.
Table 4

Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors for survival during NSS events (n=32)

FactorsEvents of survive (n=20)Events of death (n=12)p-value
UnivariateMultivariate
Age (yr)56.5 (29–66)64.0 (46–78)0.0120.020
Mean body mass index (kg/m2)24.1 (14.7–28.4)23.0 (17.1–27.5)0.829-
ECOG performance status0.150-
I–II14 (70.0)5 (41.7)
III–IV6 (30.0)7 (58.3)
Type of cancer
Ovarian12 (60.0)5 (41.7)0.437-
Cervical3 (15.0)3 (25.0)--
Endometrial3 (15.0)4 (33.3)--
Other2 (10.0)0--
FIGO stage
I–II3 (15.0)4 (33.3)0.379-
III–IV17 (85.0)8 (66.7)--
Recurrence status
Primary treatment3 (15.0)5 (41.7)0.116-
Recurrent disease17 (85.0)7 (58.3)--
Past history of neutropenic fever8 (40.0)4 (33.3)>0.999-
Comorbidities
Hypertension2 (10.0)2 (16.7)0.620-
Diabetes3 (15.0)1 (8.3)>0.999-
Lung metastasis2 (10.0)4 (33.3)0.165-
Splenectomy5 (25.0)2 (16.7)0.683-
Ileostomy2 (10.0)3 (25.0)0.338-
Carcinomatosis peritonei7 (35.0)5 (41.7)0.724-
Deep vein thrombosis7 (35.0)1 (8.3)0.204-
Factors at the initial diagnosis of NSS
Time from cancer diagnosis (mo)20.5 (1.0–85.0)19.0 (0–95.0)0.687-
Time from the last chemotherapy (day)8.0 (3.0–14.0)7.0 (4.0–14.0)0.890-
No. of courses of chemotherapy received2.5 (1.0–8.0)1.5 (1.0–6.0)0.209-
Heart rate (/min)112.0 (84.0–140.0)122.5 (101.0–184.0)0.0390.460
Hemoglobin (mg/dL)10.3 (7.0–13.3)9.6 (5.6–13.8)0.720-
Factors during NSS treatment
Peak body temperature (°C)39.2 (37.3–40.4)38.1 (35.6–40.4)0.067-
Peak heart rate (/min)123.5 (110.0–180.0)149.5 (120.0–200.0)0.0020.015
The lowest neutrophil count (mg/dL)20.0 (0–500.0)35.0 (0–260.0)>0.999-
The highest creatinine concentration (mg/dL)1.2 (0.64–4.1)2.0 (1.3–4.3)0.146-
The highest CRP concentration (mg/dL)30.2 (10.0–35.7)28.2 (13.8–34.1)0.687-
Duration of the vasopressor administration (hr)*38.0 (6.0–140.8)20.9 (0.2–50.2)0.036-

All values are expressed as the median (range) or number (%).

Numbers marked in bold indicate p-values less than 0.05, which is considered statistically significant.

CRP, C-reactive protein; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; NSS, neutropenic septic shock.

*Multivariate analysis was not performed, since this difference is thought to be the consequence of events in the group of patients who died and had no recovery period from septic shock.

Table 5

Identified pathogens in blood and urine cultures

FactorsEvents of survive (n=20)Events of death (n=12)
Patients with isolated pathogen15 (75.0)10 (83.3)
Blood culture
Escherichia coli, ESBL (−)3 (15.0)3 (25.0)
Escherichia coli, ESBL (+)2 (10.0)0
Klebsiella pneumoniae2 (10.0)2 (16.7)
Enterobacter cloacae2 (10.0)0
Enterobacter cancerogenus1 (5.0)0
Pseudomonas aeruginosa01 (8.3)
Enterococcus01 (8.3)
Bacillus1 (5.0)0
Not identified9 (45.0)5 (41.7)
Urine culture
Escherichia coli, ESBL (+)2 (10.0)0
Enterococcus3 (15.0)2 (16.7)
Corynebacterium1 (5.0)0
Staphylococcus aureus01 (8.3)
Yeast01 (8.3)
Mixed2 (10.0)0
Not identified12 (60.0)8 (66.7)

ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase.

All values are expressed as the median (range) or number (%). Numbers marked in bold indicate p-values less than 0.05, which is considered statistically significant. CRP, C-reactive protein; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; NSS, neutropenic septic shock. *Multivariate analysis was not performed, since this difference is thought to be the consequence of events in the group of patients who died and had no recovery period from septic shock. ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase.

DISCUSSION

This was a retrospective study to investigate the incidence and clinical features of NSS induced by chemotherapy in gynecological cancer patients. Although neutropenic sepsis and septic shock are the most fatal chemotherapy-related complications, research in the field of gynecological malignancies is lacking. Moreover, despite the fact that many patients with recurrent gynecological malignancies receive chemotherapy, few studies have been conducted in the recurrence setting. Therefore, the incidence of NSS can only be estimated from clinical trial toxicity data. However, this approach differs from real-world studies, since most clinical trials do not provide sufficient toxicity data for sepsis, and target highly selected patients with a good performance status [910]. Moreover, clinical trials monitor the toxicity over short time-periods and are therefore inadequate for determining the overall incidence of NSS in patients who are treated repeatedly over several years. Markman et al. [2] reported one (0.3%) neutropenic-related death in a retrospective study of 323 primary and recurrent gynecological cancer patients. Sharma et al. [15] reported no NSS-related deaths in a study of 125 patients with ovarian cancer who received first-line chemotherapy. Several large clinical trials conducted for primary or recurrent gynecologic malignancies have reported a septic shock-related mortality rate of 0%–0.9% [16222324252627]. This allows us to estimate that the incidence of septic shock is 0%–2.25%, since mortality from septic shock is known to be roughly 40% [12]. Our overall NSS incidence (3.0%) is higher than that reported in previous studies, especially in patients who received second or higher courses of chemotherapy (4.9%). The patient group and observation period in our study differ from those in previous studies, since we analyzed the total chemotherapy period of the patients to better reflect the exact overall incidence of NSS. The patients analyzed in the present study received an average of 2.2 courses and 10.1 cycles of chemotherapy. In addition, 23.8% were heavily treated patients who received 3 or more courses of chemotherapy; however, since 99.2% of the patients included in our study were Korean, ethnic differences in hematological toxicity may have affected the results. Ethnic diversity in drug response and toxicity results from the combined interaction of many factors, such as differences in genetics, the environment, drug–drug interactions, and local practice. Several studies have shown that greater toxicity and responses to chemotherapy are observed in Asians as compared with Caucasians [28]. Takei et al. [29] conducted a feasibility study of carboplatin and paclitaxel in Japanese ovarian cancer patients, reporting that grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 80% of patients. Kim et al. [30] showed that the incidence of febrile neutropenia during doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel chemotherapy in Korean breast cancer patients was 29.5%, which is higher than that reported in previous studies conducted in Western countries. The increase in NSS incidence with increasing numbers of chemotherapy courses identified in our study appears to be the consequence of increased exposure to chemotherapy and cumulative myelosuppression by carboplatin [3132]. It is also thought to be the result of deterioration of performance status due to repeated treatment, in addition to cancer progression. Old age, poor performance status, low BMI, advanced disease, prior chemotherapy, and the presence of major comorbidities are known risk factors for the development of neutropenic fever [3334]. Previous studies have reported differences in the incidence of neutropenia and neutropenic fever according to chemotherapy regimen. In a pooled analysis of the adverse effects of several randomized trials, Covens et al. [35] found that carboplatin produced grade 3 or 4 hematological adverse effects more frequently than cisplatin. Further, docetaxel, administered as a single agent or in combination, has been shown to cause a higher incidence and severity of neutropenia than paclitaxel [236]. The incidence of NSS is also expected to vary according to chemotherapy regimen, but this was not statistically verified in the present study. Each chemotherapy regimen was administered in a different clinical situation, such as varied cancer sites, stage, recurrence status, and platinum sensitivity, and NSS events may have been affected by the chemotherapeutic agents administered in previous courses. Considering these points, the number of NSS events that occurred during each regimen was too small to verify statistically. Whether chemotherapy regimens with a higher risk of neutropenia also increase the incidence of NSS is a question that needs to be verified by further large-scale studies. In the initial treatment of septic shock, adequate volume resuscitation often results in a decrease in heart rate; however, expression of sympathetic overstimulation due to activation of peripheral afferent fibers by ischemia and inflammation causes persistent tachycardia [37]. Previous analysis of 48 patients with septic shock found that an initial heart rate of <106 min−1 and <95 min−1 significantly predicts survival [38]. Through analysis of NSS events in the present study, it was found that peak heart rate during NSS events was related to death, which was confirmed by ROC curve analysis, with a cut-off value of 141 min−1. However, predefining a threshold value for heart rate is difficult, since it must be individualized in the context of the patient's overall hemodynamic condition, pre-existing comorbidities, and drug effects [37]; therefore, the cut-off value reported in the present study must be verified in further studies. The definition and treatment of sepsis in neutropenic cancer patients follow the general treatment guidelines for sepsis [17]. In 2014, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Society of Critical Care Medicine redefined septic shock, adding a serum lactate level of 2 mmol/L or higher to the diagnostic criteria [12]. In the present study, we did not report the lactate level, since patients with fluid-resistant hypotension but a lactate level of 2 mmol/L or less also have a high mortality rate of over 30% [12]. Initial resuscitation in this subset of patients is similar to that in those with a lactate level greater than 2 mmol/L [20]. Moreover, we could not identify baseline lactate levels in 55.3% of septic shock events. Our hospital routinely measures the lactate levels in septic shock patients using blood gas analyzers installed in the intensive care unit and emergency department, and we can check the results on the screen or print them out. However, since certain values, including lactate levels, were not transferred to the electronic chart prior to 2017, lactate levels could not be identified in several NSS events. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study to analyze the incidence and clinical course of NSS in patients receiving chemotherapy in the field of gynecological cancer. There exist several limitations to the present study, however, which are as follows: Firstly, all the disadvantages that arise as a result of retrospective analysis are present. Secondly, due to the rarity of NSS, the total number of NSS events observed in the present study is small. Thirdly, risk factors for NSS occurrence were not analyzed according to performance status, dose reduction, or prior pelvic radiation therapy. In conclusion, for patients with gynecological cancer treated with chemotherapy, it was found that the overall incidence of NSS was 3.0%, and for patients who received second or higher courses of chemotherapy, it was 4.9%. An age greater than 50 years old at the time of the initial course and second or higher courses of chemotherapy was found to be a risk factor for developing NSS. Patients with these risk factors may be candidates for prophylactic use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors, and further studies are needed. The mean age and peak heart rate during NSS events were significantly higher in patients who subsequently died from NSS than in those who survived.
  35 in total

1.  Management of febrile neutropaenia: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  J Klastersky; J de Naurois; K Rolston; B Rapoport; G Maschmeyer; M Aapro; J Herrstedt
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Survival in neutropenic patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Authors:  Matthieu Legrand; Adeline Max; Vincent Peigne; Eric Mariotte; Emmanuel Canet; Alexandre Debrumetz; Virginie Lemiale; Amélie Seguin; Michael Darmon; Benoît Schlemmer; Elie Azoulay
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Leon E Cosler; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference.

Authors:  Mitchell M Levy; Mitchell P Fink; John C Marshall; Edward Abraham; Derek Angus; Deborah Cook; Jonathan Cohen; Steven M Opal; Jean-Louis Vincent; Graham Ramsay
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Advanced ovarian cancer: phase III randomized study of sequential cisplatin-topotecan and carboplatin-paclitaxel vs carboplatin-paclitaxel.

Authors:  P Hoskins; I Vergote; A Cervantes; D Tu; G Stuart; P Zola; A Poveda; D Provencher; D Katsaros; B Ojeda; P Ghatage; R Grimshaw; A Casado; L Elit; C Mendiola; A Sugimoto; V D'Hondt; A Oza; J R Germa; M Roy; L Brotto; D Chen; E A Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Recommendations for the Use of WBC Growth Factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Kari Bohlke; Gary H Lyman; Kenneth R Carson; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; John M Goldberg; James L Khatcheressian; Natasha B Leighl; Cheryl L Perkins; George Somlo; James L Wade; Antoinette J Wozniak; James O Armitage
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A feasibility study of paclitaxel and carboplatin therapy in Japanese patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yuji Takei; Mitsuaki Suzuki; Michitaka Ohwada; Yasushi Saga; Takahiro Kohno; Shizuo Machida; Ikuo Sato
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Relationships between carboplatin exposure and tumor response and toxicity in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D I Jodrell; M J Egorin; R M Canetta; P Langenberg; E P Goldbloom; J N Burroughs; J L Goodlow; S Tan; E Wiltshaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Management of treatment-related toxicity in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Dunton
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2002

Review 10.  Management of sepsis in neutropenic patients: 2014 updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (AGIHO).

Authors:  Olaf Penack; Carolin Becker; Dieter Buchheidt; Maximilian Christopeit; Michael Kiehl; Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal; Marcus Hentrich; Marc Reinwald; Hans Salwender; Enrico Schalk; Martin Schmidt-Hieber; Thomas Weber; Helmut Ostermann
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.673

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Understanding and Managing Sepsis in Patients With Cancer in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance.

Authors:  Carlota Gudiol; Adaia Albasanz-Puig; Guillermo Cuervo; Jordi Carratalà
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-31

2.  Immunomodulatory Effect of Ginsenoside Rb2 Against Cyclophosphamide-Induced Immunosuppression in Mice.

Authors:  Siwen Zheng; Housheng Zheng; Rui Zhang; Xiangmin Piao; Junnan Hu; Yanzhu Zhu; Yingping Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 5.988

3.  Maximum daily dose of G-CSF is critical for preventing recurrence of febrile neutropenia in patients with gynecologic cancer: A case-control study.

Authors:  Nam Kyeong Kim; Dong Hoon Suh; Kidong Kim; Jae Hong No; Yong Beom Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.