Fabrizio Toscano1,2,3, Eloise O'Donnell4, Joan E Broderick5, Marcella May5, Pippa Tucker5, Mark A Unruh4, Gabriele Messina6, Lawrence P Casalino4. 1. Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. ftoscanomd@gmail.com. 2. Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. ftoscanomd@gmail.com. 3. Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA. ftoscanomd@gmail.com. 4. Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 5. Center for Social & Economic Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 6. Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about how physicians spend their work time. OBJECTIVE: To determine how physicians in outpatient care spend their time at work, using an innovative method: ecological momentary assessment (EMA). DESIGN: Physician activity was measured via EMA, using a smartphone app. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight practices across 16 US states. Sixty-one physicians: general internal medicine, family medicine, non-interventional cardiology, orthopedics. MAIN MEASURES: Proportions of time spent on 14 activities within 6 broad categories of work: direct patient care (including both face-to-face care and other patient care-related activities), electronic health record (EHR) input, administration, teaching/supervising, personal time, and other. KEY RESULTS: After excluding personal time, physicians spent 66.5% of their time on direct patient care (23.6% multitasking with use of the EHR and 42.9% without the EHR), 20.7% on EHR input alone, 7.7% on administrative activities, and 5.0% on other activities (0.6% using the EHR). In total, physicians spent 44.9% of their time on the EHR. LIMITATIONS: Unable to measure time spent at home on the EHR or other work tasks; participating physicians were not a random sample of US physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The efficiency of highly trained professionals spending only two-thirds of their time on direct patient care may be questioned. EHR use continues to account for a large proportion of physician time. Further attempts should be made to redesign both EHRs and physician work processes.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about how physicians spend their work time. OBJECTIVE: To determine how physicians in outpatient care spend their time at work, using an innovative method: ecological momentary assessment (EMA). DESIGN: Physician activity was measured via EMA, using a smartphone app. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight practices across 16 US states. Sixty-one physicians: general internal medicine, family medicine, non-interventional cardiology, orthopedics. MAIN MEASURES: Proportions of time spent on 14 activities within 6 broad categories of work: direct patient care (including both face-to-face care and other patient care-related activities), electronic health record (EHR) input, administration, teaching/supervising, personal time, and other. KEY RESULTS: After excluding personal time, physicians spent 66.5% of their time on direct patient care (23.6% multitasking with use of the EHR and 42.9% without the EHR), 20.7% on EHR input alone, 7.7% on administrative activities, and 5.0% on other activities (0.6% using the EHR). In total, physicians spent 44.9% of their time on the EHR. LIMITATIONS: Unable to measure time spent at home on the EHR or other work tasks; participating physicians were not a random sample of US physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The efficiency of highly trained professionals spending only two-thirds of their time on direct patient care may be questioned. EHR use continues to account for a large proportion of physician time. Further attempts should be made to redesign both EHRs and physician work processes.
Entities:
Keywords:
electronic medical records; physicians time
Authors: Stewart Babbott; Linda Baier Manwell; Roger Brown; Enid Montague; Eric Williams; Mark Schwartz; Erik Hess; Mark Linzer Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Lawrence P Casalino; David Gans; Rachel Weber; Meagan Cea; Amber Tuchovsky; Tara F Bishop; Yesenia Miranda; Brittany A Frankel; Kristina B Ziehler; Meghan M Wong; Todd B Evenson Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Brian G Arndt; John W Beasley; Michelle D Watkinson; Jonathan L Temte; Wen-Jan Tuan; Christine A Sinsky; Valerie J Gilchrist Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Ming Tai-Seale; Cliff W Olson; Jinnan Li; Albert S Chan; Criss Morikawa; Meg Durbin; Wei Wang; Harold S Luft Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Elizabeth R Pfoh; Sandra Hong; Laura Baranek; Michael B Rothberg; Sarah Beinkampen; Anita D Misra-Hebert; Susan J Rehm; Andrea L Sikon Journal: Med Care Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 2.983