Molecular evidence of piroplasm infection in companion animals in Hunan Province, China.

BACKGROUND: Feline and canine babesiosis is an important tick-borne disease caused by parasites of the genus Babesia. The disease has a worldwide distribution and causes serious health problems in domestic and wild canidae and felidae.
RESULTS: Genomic DNA was isolated from blood samples, which were randomly collected from pet dogs (n = 115) and cats (n = 25) in Changsha city of Hunan Province, China. Results of nested PCR assay targeting 18S rRNA gene and partial gene sequencing revealed that seven animals were infected with Babesia species, five dogs (5/115, 4.3%) and two cats (2/25, 8.0%). Sequence analysis showed that four dogs (3.5%) were positive for Babesia canis, and the other one for Babesia vogeli (0.87%). The two cats were infected by Babesia hongkongensis.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study will expand knowledge of the distribution of Babesia species and provide important epidemiological information for the control of animal babesiosis in China.

Background

Feline and canine babesiosis, an important tick-borne hemoprotozoan disease, is prevalent with a worldwide distribution. This disease is caused by several obligate intracellular parasites of the genus Babesia and is characterized by fever, anemia, icterus, hemoglobinuria/bilirubinuria, anorexia, weight loss, and weakness caused by destruction of erythrocytes [1, 4, 12, 25]. It has a serious impact on health of domestic and wild felids and canids. So far, at least 13 identified Babesia species have been detected in domestic cats or wild felids worldwide, including Babesia felis, Babesia cati, Babesia leo, Babesia hongkongensis, Babesia herpailuri, Babesia pantherae, Babesia lengau, Babesia gibsoni, Babesia canis, Babesia vogeli, Babesia rossi, Babesia presentii, and Babesia microti, together with several unidentified Babesia species [5, 8, 14].

Most studied clinical cases of feline babesiosis are induced by Babesia felis, especially in South Africa. This parasite can infect domestic cats, as well as other felids, such as cheetahs and several wild species [1, 21, 23]. Babesia cati, a less pathogenic Babesia species, is primarily found in India and results in milder clinical disease [1, 12]. Babesia leo was considered to infect lions in South Africa, but it has also been detected in a clinically healthy domestic cat [6, 20]. Babesia hongkongensis infection in cats has only been reported in Hong Kong, China [29]. The clinical course of other Babesia species in felids has not been well characterized [21].

Compared with feline babesiosis, the pathogens, clinical descriptions and geographic distributions of canine babesiosis are well-documented. Three large Babesia species have been identified in dogs, B. canis, B. rossi, and B. vogeli. In addition, an unnamed Babesia species that is closely related to Babesia bigemina, has been described in North Carolina in the United States [4, 11, 12, 22]. Babesia vogeli is widespread in the tropical, subtropical and temperate areas of the world. Babesia canis and B. rossi are distributed mainly in Europe and Southern Africa, respectively [12]. There are three small Babesia species that can infect canids [16]. Babesia gibsoni has a worldwide distribution and is a major pathogen of canine babesiosis [32]. Babesia conradae has not yet been reported outside California [15]; Babesia vulpes has been reported in canids in Spain, Italy, Portugal, Croatia, Germany, and the USA [2, 3, 7].

Since 1985, when Lv et al. diagnosed two cases of canine babesiosis caused by B. gibsoni in China [28], this disease has been reported in several provinces across China, including Jiangsu [17], Jiangxi [33], Zhejiang, Anhui, Henan, Shaanxi, Liaoning, Shandong, and Qinghai [24, 26]. These reports have revealed that B. gibsoni, B. vogeli, and B. canis are the causative agents of canine babesiosis in those investigated regions. For feline babesiosis, there is a lack of case reports and pathogen detection in mainland China. However, limited information is available on the prevalence of canine and feline Babesia in Hunan Province of China. In the present study, the status of Babesia infection was investigated using 115 blood samples from pet dogs and 25 from cats located in Changsha city of Hunan Province, China.

Results

Results of the nested PCR revealed that the percentage of blood samples containing piroplasms was 4.2% (5/115) in domestic dogs and 8.0% (2/25) in cats. To classify the Babesia species detected in this study, long fragments of the 18S rRNA gene (approximately 1400 bp) were successfully amplified from each positive sample for Babesia (Table 1). Results of the sequence analysis were identical to those for the short sequences. The sequences (MH143390–MH143393) shared 99.4–99.9% identity with B. canis derived from dogs in Croatia (AY072926) and Estonia (KT008057). Sequences of MH143394 determined in a poodle dog shared 99.6–99.9% identity with B. vogeli (KY290979, AY072925, AY371198). The two isolates (MH143396, MH143397) from cats were closely related to B. hongkongensis (JQ867356), with 99.6–99.9% sequence identity. Finally, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor joining method of MEGA7. The result indicated that the 18S rRNA gene sequences obtained in this study and previously deposited in GenBank were divided into six groups: B. canis, B. vogeli, B. rossi, B. conradae, B. gibsoni and B. hongkongensis (Fig. 1). These data indicate that three Babesia spp. infective to dogs or cats were identified in this study.

Table 1

Clincial information on the pet animals and the Babesia spp. identified in the present study

	Samples ID			Clinical signs	Size of PCR product (bp)	Identified pathogens	Accession number
Species	Animal breed	Age	Sex
Dog	Miniature schnauzer	11 month	Female	Fever and cough	407, 1405	B. canis	MH143375, MH143390
	Japanese Spitz	3 year	Male	lethargy	408, 1419	B. canis	MH143376, MH143391
	Chinese Field Dog	5 year	Male	Fever	408, 1406	B. canis	MH143377, MH143392
	Border collie	1 year	Female	No signs of babesiosis	407, 1405	B. canis	MH143378, MH143393
	Poodle	7 year	Female	Loss of appetite	405, 1404	B. vogeli	MH143379, MH143394
Cat	Garfield	3 month	Male	No signs of babesiosis	403, 1413	B. hongkongensis	MH143381, MH143396
	British shorthair cat	7 month	Female	No signs of babesiosis	403, 1400	B. hongkongensis	MH143382, MH143397

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree based on the sequences of the Babesia 18S rRNA gene (approximately 1400 bp). The tree was constructed using the neighbor joining method of MEGA7 software, and values are given at the nodes. Numbers above the branches demonstrate bootstrap support from 1000 replications. The newly generated sequences in the present study are indicated by bold triangles

Discussion

The prevalence of several tick-borne diseases, caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Rickettsia helvetica, Borrelia burgdorferi and B. canis, is closely related to the spatial and temporal distribution of competent vector ticks in specific regions [10, 13]. The majority of investigations of canine piroplasmosis have been performed during the spring or autumn, the seasons of highest vector tick activity. It has been previously reported in China that the prevalence of B. gibsoni and B. vogeli is 1.5–11.86% and 1.2–11.3%, respectively [9, 18, 30, 33]. In 2019, 130 blood samples were randomly collected from pet dogs in Henan Province to investigate the infection status of piroplasms during the winter. Babesia canis infective to dogs was identified for the first time in China, with a prevalence of 8.8% [26].

In this study, to evaluate the infection status of piroplasms, a small scale investigation using a nested PCR assay combined with gene sequencing was performed in companion animals in Hunan Province. The prevalence of Babesia spp. infections in dogs and cats were 4.3 and 8.0%, respectively, which indicated that there is a prevalence of canine and feline Babesia infection in this area. On the basis of sequence alignment, two canine Babesia species (B. canis, B. vogeli) and one feline Babesia species (B. hongkongensis) were identified in the dog and cat samples, respectively. No B. gibsoni infection was identified in these dogs, but one dog (0.87%) was infected by B. vogeli.

The fact that the pet dogs studied have never travelled outside Changsha city suggested that these parasite infections were locally acquired and endemic in this area. A novel Babesia species was identified in a free-roaming cat and named B. hongkongensis which was previously descried as a feline Babesia in China by Wong et al. [29]. In this study, this species was also identified in two cat samples (8.0%). However, the vector tick of B. hongkongensis is unknown, and this needs to be investigated in the future.

Conclusion

This study has demonstrated a prevalence of Babesia infection in pet dogs and cats. The three previously recorded canine and feline Babesia species (B. vogeli and B. canis and B. hongkongensis) are also prevalent in Hunan Province, China. These data provide valuable information on the distribution of canine and feline Babesia species in China.

Methods

Sample collection and DNA extraction

Between October 2017 and May 2018, 140 blood samples were randomly collected from pet animals, including 115 dogs (61 males and 54 females, 2 months to 16 years old) and 25 cats (nine males and 14 female, 2 months to 5 years old) in animal hospital located in Changsha in the Hunan Province, China. Blood samples were collected in EDTA-coated vacutainer tubes and transported to the laboratory in iceboxes. Genomic DNA was extracted from 200 μL of each blood sample using a commercial DNA extraction kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen DNA blood mini-kit, Germany).

Nested PCR for detection of piroplasms infection

A nested PCR (nPCR) that is universal for piroplasms was used to detect piroplasms infective to dogs and cats as previously reported [26, 27, 31]. Briefly, a set of primers (Piro1-S: 5′-CTTGACGGTAGGGTATTGGC-3′, Piro3-AS: 5′-CCTTCCTTTAAGTGATAAG GTTCAC-3′) was applied to amplify large size fragments of 18S rRNA in the first-round PCR [31]. Moreover, genomic DNA of Babesia bovis and distilled water were used as positive control and the negative control, respectively. Furthermore, small size fragments were amplified using primers (Piro-A: 5′-TTAAATACGAATGCCCCCAAC-3′ and Piro-B: 5′- ATTACCCAATMCBGACACVGKG-3′) [18, 19, 26, 27, 31]. Positive amplicons were purified using a gel DNA purification kit (Zymo, USA), cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, USA). For each amplicon, three positive clones were sequenced using BigDye Terminator Mix (Genscript, Nanjing, China).

PCR amplification of Babesia 18S rRNA gene fragments

To identify the species of piroplasm infecting pet animals, long fragments of the 18S rRNA gene were amplified from positive samples using a nested PCR assay [26, 27]. For each amplicon, three positive clones were sequenced using the BigDye Terminator Mix (Tsingke Biological Technology, China).

Sequences analysis

The 18S rRNA gene sequences obtained in this study were subjected to blast analysis on the NCBI website using the BLASTn program. Representative sequences were deposited in the GenBank database.

A phylogenetic tree was inferred by neighbor joining method using MEGA 7.0 software based on the sequences obtained in this study and the 18S rRNA gene sequences of Babesia spp. previously submitted to GenBank.