| Literature DB >> 32806670 |
Kazuki Izawa1, Atsutaka Kubosaki2, Naoki Kobayashi3, Yutaka Akiyama1, Akiko Yamazaki4, Kazuhiro Hashimoto5, Rumi Konuma6, Yoichi Kamata7,8, Yukiko Hara-Kudo2, Kenichi Hasegawa9, Toshiharu Ikaga10, Maiko Watanabe2.
Abstract
Fungal community analyses in homes have been attracting attention because fungi are now generally considered to be allergens. Currently, these analyses are generally conducted using the culture method, although fungal communities in households often contain species that are difficult to culture. In contrast, next-generation sequencing (NGS) represents a comprehensive, labor- and time-saving approach that can facilitate species identification. However, the reliability of the NGS method has not been compared to that of the culture method. In this study, in an attempt to demonstrate the reliability of this application, we used the NGS method to target the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) in the fungal genome, conducted fungal community analyses for 18 house-dust samples and analyzed fungal community structures. The NGS method positively correlated with the culture method regarding the relative abundance of Aspergillus, Penicillium, Cladosporium and yeasts, which represent the major fungal components found in houses. Furthermore, several genera, such as Malassezia, could be sensitively detected. Our results imply that the reliability of the NGS method is comparable to that of the culture method and indicates that easily available databases may require modifications, including the removal of registrations that have not been sufficiently classified at the genus level.Entities:
Keywords: ITS region; fungal community analysis; house dust; next-generation sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32806670 PMCID: PMC7460106 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17165842
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Rarefaction curves of all samples. (a) Rarefaction curves for SEH3 to SEH34 and (b) rarefaction curves for SEH37 to SEH61. Dotted lines are the duplicates of solid line samples in various colors.
Figure 2Dendrogram of all samples according to the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA) based on the beta diversity of community structures.
Figure 3Taxonomic compositions of the fungal communities in 36 PCR duplicates of house dust samples. (a) Without the removal of database sequences classified at the genus level; (b) with those sequences removed. Gray bar indicates the ‘Others’ category defined as the occupancy rate of the total remaining species other than the 19 genera shown in this figure. Red bar indicates the ‘unidentified at the genus-level category’ defined as the assignment to database registrations that are not classified at the genus level. Purple bar indicates the ‘unassigned’ category defined as the failure to be assigned to any database sequences with more than a 98% homology.
Comparison of fungal occupancy rates between the use of the intact and modified database.
| House Dust Sample | Rate Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unassigned Reads | Other Genera | Maximum in a Sample | ||
| Genus | Difference (%) | |||
| SHE-3 | −3.1 | 1.5 |
| 0.8 |
| SHE-6 | −7.0 | 4.2 |
| 1.2 |
| SHE-12 | −10.3 | 6.9 |
| 2.5 |
| SHE-14 | −4.4 | 3.0 |
| 0.6 |
| SHE-17 | −6.7 | 2.1 |
| 3.5 |
| SHE-26 | −15.9 | 9.4 |
| 2.7 |
| SHE-28 | −20.2 | 14.4 |
| 4.8 |
| SHE-32 | −27.1 | 11.2 |
| 10.7 |
| SHE-34 | −6.8 | 0.9 |
| 5.8 |
| SHE-37 | −4.0 | 0.9 |
| 1.4 |
| SHE-41 | −19.8 | 2.2 |
| 13.0 |
| SHE-45 | −9.6 | 0.7 |
| 7.9 |
| SHE-47 | −11.6 | 4.4 |
| 4.0 |
| SHE-50 | −6.2 | 0.9 |
| 2.2 |
| SHE-52 | −20.8 | 12.3 |
| 8.0 |
| SHE-54 | −12.9 | 9.9 |
| 1.0 |
| SHE-58 | −13.9 | 0.5 |
| 12.8 |
| SHE-61 | −5.2 | 4.9 |
| 0.1 |
*1 (Intact UNITE+INSDC)-(Modified UNITE+INSDC) *2 (“unassigned” in Figure 3b)-(“unidentified in the genus level” in Figure 3a).
Figure 4Comparisons of fungal occupancy rates between the next-generation sequencing (NGS) and culture methods. The bars are arranged from left to right by increasing total fungal counts/1 g house dust.
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between the NGS and culture methods and a comparison of the two groups of house dust samples as divided by whether the total fungal counts/1 g house dust were above or below 106 colony-forming units (cfu).
| Fungal Group | Correlation Coefficients | |
|---|---|---|
| Total Fungal Count | Total Fungal Count | |
|
| 0.29 | 0.66 |
|
| 0.57 | 0.94 |
|
| 0.38 | 0.37 |
| Yeasts | 0.41 | 0.46 |