Literature DB >> 32803895

After the Randomized Trial: Implementation of Community-Based Continence Promotion in the Real World.

Nicholas B Schmuhl1, Katie A Brow2, Meg E Wise3, Shannon Myers4, Jane E Mahoney5, Heidi W Brown1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: Most women aged 65 and older have incontinence, associated with high healthcare costs, institutionalization, and negative quality of life, but few seek care. Mind over Matter: Healthy Bowels, Healthy Bladder (MOM) is a small-group self-management workshop, led by a trained facilitator in a community setting, proven to improve incontinence in older women.
DESIGN: We used mixed methods to gather information on the real-world adoption, maintenance, and implementation of MOM by community agencies following a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that tested intervention effects on incontinence.
SETTING: Community agencies serving older adults in six Wisconsin communities. PARTICIPANTS: Community agency administrators and facilitators trained to offer MOM for the RCT. MEASUREMENTS: Investigators tracked rates of adoption (offering MOM in the 12 months following the RCT) and maintenance (offering MOM more than once in the next 18 months) in six communities. Individual interviews and focus groups (N = 17) generated qualitative data about barriers and facilitators related to adoption and maintenance. Trained observers assessed implementation fidelity (alignment with program protocol) at 42 MOM sessions.
RESULTS: A total of 67% of communities (four of six) adopted MOM, and 50% (three of six) maintained MOM. No implementation fidelity lapses occurred. Facilitators of adoption and maintenance included MOM's well-organized protocol and lean time commitment, sharing of implementation efforts between partner organizations, staff specifically assigned to health promotion activities, and high community interest in continence promotion. Other than stigma associated with incontinence, barriers were similar to those seen with other community-based programs for older adults: limited funding/staffing, competing organizational priorities, challenges identifying/training facilitators, and difficulty engaging community partners/participants.
CONCLUSION: Using design for dissemination and community engagement, assessment of implementation outcomes is feasible in conjunction with a clinical RCT. Partner-centered implementation packages can address barriers to adoption and maintenance.
© 2020 The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bowel incontinence; community-based health promotion; dissemination and implementation; fecal incontinence; urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32803895      PMCID: PMC7857672          DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  21 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; T M Vogt; S M Boles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Implementation, generalization and long-term results of the "choosing well" diabetes self-management intervention.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Deborah J Toobert; Sarah E Hampson; Lisa A Strycker
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002 Oct -Nov

3.  Translational and clinical science--time for a new vision.

Authors:  Elias A Zerhouni
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

5.  A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare 2 Scalable Interventions for Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Prevention: Main Outcomes of the TULIP Study.

Authors:  Carolyn M Sampselle; Diane K Newman; Janis M Miller; Keri Kirk; Mary Ann DiCamillo; Todd H Wagner; Trivellor E Raghunathan; Ananias C Diokno
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Essential Resources for Implementation and Sustainability of Evidence-Based Health Promotion Programs: A Mixed Methods Multi-Site Case Study.

Authors:  M Dattalo; M Wise; J H Ford Ii; B Abramson; J Mahoney
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-04

Review 7.  The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time.

Authors:  Bridget Gaglio; Jo Ann Shoup; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Prevalence, trends, and risk factors for fecal incontinence in United States adults, 2005-2010.

Authors:  Ivo Ditah; Pardha Devaki; Henry N Luma; Chobufo Ditah; Basile Njei; Charles Jaiyeoba; Augustine Salami; Calistus Ditah; Oforbuike Ewelukwa; Lawrence Szarka
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Small-Group, Community-Member Intervention for Urinary and Bowel Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Heidi W Brown; Emilie J Braun; Meg E Wise; Shannon Myers; Zhanhai Li; Emmanuel Sampene; Sierra M Jansen; D Paul Moberg; Jane E Mahoney; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 7.623

Review 10.  Fidelity to and comparative results across behavioral interventions evaluated through the RE-AIM framework: a systematic review.

Authors:  Samantha M Harden; Bridget Gaglio; Jo Ann Shoup; Kimberlee A Kinney; Sallie Beth Johnson; Fabiana Brito; Kacie C A Blackman; Jamie M Zoellner; Jennie L Hill; Fabio A Almeida; Russell E Glasgow; Paul A Estabrooks
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.