| Literature DB >> 32802934 |
Andrew J Affleck1,2, Perminder S Sachdev3, Julia Stevens4, Glenda M Halliday1,5,6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mounting evidence supports an association between antihypertensive medication use and reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Consensus on possible pathological mechanisms remains elusive.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; amyloid; antihypertensive medication; neuropathology; tau
Year: 2020 PMID: 32802934 PMCID: PMC7424255 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) ISSN: 2352-8737
Demographic, clinical, and pathological profile of cases
| Clinical Dementia Rating (n) | 0‐0.5 (60) | 1‐3 (89) |
|---|---|---|
| AD intermediate/high level change, n (%) |
|
|
| Age at death, mean years (SD) |
|
|
| Male, n (%) | 29 (48%) | 31 (35%) |
| PMD, mean hours (SD) | 23 (18) | 23 (19) |
| Hypertensive, n (%) | 33 (55%) | 40 (45%) |
| Hypertension duration, mean years (SD) |
|
|
| Hypertensive and medicated, n (% of hypertensive) | 28 (85%) | 29 (73%) |
| Normotensive, n (%) | 27 (45%) | 49 (55%) |
| Normotensive and medicated, n (% of normotensive) |
|
|
| Cerebrovascular disease and vascular brain injury, n (%) | 29 (48%) | 48 (54%) |
| Single infarct (non‐lobar), n (% of CVD) | 12 (41%) | 21 (44%) |
| Multiple infarcts (non‐lobar), n (% of CVD) | 17 (59%) | 27 (56%) |
Hypertensive cases based on clinical assessment.
Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer's disease: CVD, cerebrovascular disease and vascular brain injury cases; CDR, Clinical Dementia Rating; n, number of cases; PMD, post mortem delay; SD, standard deviation.
Average duration in years of hypertensive cases, incomplete data for some cases; five from 0 to 0.5 CDR group and two from 1 to 3 CDR group due to incomplete clinical record (confirmation of hypertensive status but no information on date of diagnosis). Statistically significant results (P < .05) are in bold.
P < .05.
P < .01.
P < .001. For further breakdown of this data with all CDR categories see Table S1. For further medication data see Table S2. For further breakdown of this data with the experimental subsets used see Table S3.
FIGURE 3A, Stacked bar chart representing the percentage distribution of A scores of cases with a not/low or intermediate (int)/high level of Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathologic change that is further dichotomized into antihypertensive medication (AH Medicated) use (yes = orchid color, no = cantaloupe color). Case types and number of cases illustrated in key underneath the stacked bar chart. B, Schematic illustrating the progression of amyloid beta (Aβ) through the four A score stages (A0 to A3). The left panel of (B) shows the key used for the percentage distributions depicted in (A) with descriptors of Aβ brain regional involvement. The middle panel of (B) presents a schematic of the brain at each A score with colored round circles representing the involvement of Aβ seen at each A score level. The right panel of (B) show representative immunomicrographs of Aβ normally seen at each A score level with the brain region noted under each. Scale bars = 200 µm. C, Pertinent results of the multinomial logistic regression carried out to assess the effect of variables of interest on likelihood of A score level membership using the most severe A score level (A3) as the reference group. For full details of these results please see Table S4
FIGURE 4A, Stacked bar chart representing the percentage distribution of B scores of cases with a not/low or intermediate (int)/high level of Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathologic change that is further dichotomized into antihypertensive medication (AH Medicated) use (yes = orchid color, no = cantaloupe color). Case types and number of cases illustrated in key underneath the stacked bar chart. B, Schematic illustrating the progression of neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) through the four B score stages (B0 to B3). The left panel of (B) shows the key used for the percentage distributions depicted in (A) with descriptors of NFT brain regional involvement. The middle panel of (B) presents a schematic of the brain at each B score with colored NFT icons representing the involvement of NFTs seen at each B score level. The right panel of (B) shows representative micrographs of NFTs normally seen at each B score level with the brain region noted under each. The main micrograph is of modified Bielschowsky silver stain while the insert in the top right hand corner is of the same region immunostained for tau (AT8). Scale bars = 200 μm. C, Pertinent results of the multinomial logistic regression carried out to assess the effect of variables of interest on likelihood of B score level membership using the most severe B score level (B3) as the reference group. For full details of these results please see Table S4
FIGURE 1A, Bar graph showing amounts of amyloid beta (Aβ) in the frontal cortex of cases with a not/low or intermediate (int)/high level of Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathologic change that is further dichotomized into antihypertensive medication (AH Medicated) use (yes = “+” and orchid color, no = “−” and cantaloupe color) as measured in arbitrary intensity units (AIU, left axis) by western immunoblotting (w) or average percentage area of Aβ positivity by immunohistochemistry (IHC, right axis). Case types and number of cases illustrated in key underneath bar graph. Error bars = standard error of the mean. *P < .01 Western and **P < .001 IHC for difference between not/low AD and int/high AD. B, Representative micrographs of Aβ immunohistochemistry in the frontal cortex. Those on the left‐hand side are cases that have a not/low level of AD change while cases on the right‐hand side are those that have an int/high level of AD change. Micrographs with an orchid‐colored border denote cases that had taken antihypertensive medications while micrographs with a cantaloupe‐colored border denote cases that had not taken antihypertensive medications. Scale bars = 200 µm. C, Representative western immunoblots of the data presented in (A). Lanes denoted as AD Change “‐” indicate not/low level of AD change while those denoted as AD Change “+” indicate int/high level of AD change. Lanes denoted as AH Medicated “−” indicate cases that had not taken antihypertensive medications while those denoted as AH Medicated “+” indicate cases that had taken antihypertensive medications
FIGURE 2A, Bar graph showing amounts of tau (Alz50) in the frontal cortex of cases with a not/low or intermediate (int)/high level of Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathologic change that is further dichotomized into antihypertensive medication (AH Medicated) use (yes = “+” and orchid color, no = “−” and cantaloupe color) as measured in arbitrary intensity units (AIU) by western immunoblotting. Case types and number of cases illustrated in key underneath the bar graph. Error bars = standard error of the mean. *P < .05 Western for not/low AD versus int/high AD. B, Representative immunomicrographs of tau (AT8) in the frontal cortex. Those on the left‐hand side are cases that have a not/low level of AD change while cases on the right‐hand side are those that have an int/high level of AD change. Micrographs with an orchid‐colored border denote cases that had taken antihypertensive medications while micrographs with a cantaloupe‐colored border denote cases that had not taken antihypertensive medications. Scale bars = 200 µm. C, Representative immunoblots of the western data presented in (A). Lanes denoted as AD Change “−” indicate not/low level of AD change while those denoted as AD Change “+” indicate int/high level of AD change. Lanes denoted as AH Medicated “‐” indicate cases that had not taken antihypertensive medications while those denoted as AH Medicated “+” indicate cases that had taken antihypertensive medications