| Literature DB >> 32802375 |
Yong-Bing Liu1, Wei-Juan Gong1, Xin-E Mao1.
Abstract
Aim: The study was to explore the significant influence of an English nursing course in nursing postgraduate internationalization education. Design: A cross-sectional study. Method: The research object included three grades (a total of 18) of nursing postgraduate students in the Nursing School of Yangzhou University. A standardized four-section questionnaire designed by the authors was applied to the survey.Entities:
Keywords: curriculum; education; graduate; internationality; nursing
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32802375 PMCID: PMC7424455 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nurs Open ISSN: 2054-1058
Frequency of postgraduate student responses to course design and application questions [score and number (%)]
| Item | Scores | Number (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongly agree | Agree | Uncertain | Disagree | Strongly disagree |
|
| ||
| You can understand the course | 3.28 ± 0.67 | 0 (0.0) | 8 (44.4) | 9 (50.0) | 1 (5.6) | 0 (0.0) | 24.64 | <.001 |
| Impact on your graduate study period | 3.64 ± 0.80 | 4 (22.2) | 10 (55.6) | 3 (16.6) | 1 (5.6) | 0 (0.0) | 30.73 | <.001 |
| Enlighten your future road of scientific research | 3.81 ± 0.61 | 3 (16.7) | 13 (72.2) | 2 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 30.09 | <.001 |
| Have an important influence to understand scientific research methods | 3.56 ± 0.76 | 3 (16.7) | 8 (44.4) | 7 (38.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 33.72 | <.001 |
| Your interest in the course | 4.10 ± 0.84 | 10 (55.6) | 5 (27.8) | 3 (16.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 32.87 | <.001 |
| Your assessment of the course design | 4.27 ± 0.70 | 12 (66.7) | 4 (22.2) | 2 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 31.20 | <.001 |
Frequency of postgraduate student responses to teaching design and content questions [score and number (%)]
| Item | Scores | Number (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongly agree | Agree | Uncertain | Disagree | Strongly disagree |
|
| ||
| Course learning requirements clearly (including teaching objectives and assessment methods) | 4.64 ± 0.48 | 11 (61.1) | 6 (33.3) | 1 (5.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 23.64 | <.001 |
| High quality textbooks or handouts (including rich references and bibliography) | 4.79 ± 0.49 | 14 (77.8) | 3 (16.7) | 1 (5.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 19.65 | <.001 |
| Moderated teaching information, combined theory, and practice | 4.31 ± 0.82 | 8 (44.4) | 8 (44.4) | 1 (5.6) | 1 (5.6) | 0 (0.0) | 10.22 | .007 |
| Seize the latest international tendency of gerontologic nursing | 4.58 ± 0.50 | 10 (55.6) | 7 (38.8) | 1 (5.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 24.31 | <.001 |
| Thinking clearly, teaching vividly, and stimulating interest | 4.62 ± 0.60 | 12 (66.7) | 5 (27.7) | 1 (5.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 22.64 | <.001 |
| To expound academic thought and research methods precisely | 4.53 ± 0.59 | 10 (55.6) | 7 (38.8) | 1 (5.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 24.31 | <.001 |
| Enlightening teaching and encouraging students to think independently and innovatively | 4.58 ± 0.61 | 11 (61.1) | 6 (33.3) | 1 (5.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 23.64 | <.001 |
| Diversified teaching form and methods, and improved effective teaching | 4.65 ± 0.48 | 11 (61.1) | 6 (33.3) | 1 (5.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 23.64 | <.001 |
| Helpful for students to improve their fund of knowledge and scientific research | 4.24 ± 0.65 | 6 (33.3) | 10 (55.6) | 2 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 24.66 | <.001 |
Frequency of postgraduate student responses to the academic characteristics of teacher questions [score and number (%)]
| Item | Scores | Number (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongly agree | Agree | Uncertain | Disagree | Strongly disagree | ||
| The teacher is strict and prepares lessons adequately | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 18 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Be strict with the learning and research abilities of students | 4.81 ± 0.39 | 14 (77.8) | 4 (22.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Patiently communicate with students both inside and outside the class | 4.94 ± 0.24 | 17 (94.4) | 1 (5.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Make good use of the current frontier knowledge | 4.79 ± 0.41 | 14 (77.8) | 4 (22.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Have profound academic attainments and their own teaching style | 4.95 ± 021 | 17 (94.4) | 1 (5.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Overall view of teachers is satisfied | 4.61 ± 0.30 | 15 (83.3) | 3 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |