Literature DB >> 32801606

A state-space model for dynamic functional connectivity.

Sourish Chakravarty1,2,3, Zachary D Threlkeld4, Yelena G Bodien3, Brian L Edlow3, Emery N Brown1,5,6,7,2.   

Abstract

Dynamic functional connectivity (DFC) analysis involves measuring correlated neural activity over time across multiple brain regions. Significant regional correlations among neural signals, such as those obtained from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), may represent neural circuits associated with rest. The conventional approach of estimating the correlation dynamics as a sequence of static correlations from sliding time-windows has statistical limitations. To address this issue, we propose a multivariate stochastic volatility model for estimating DFC inspired by recent work in econometrics research. This model assumes a state-space framework where the correlation dynamics of a multivariate normal observation sequence is governed by a positive-definite matrix-variate latent process. Using this statistical model within a sequential Bayesian estimation framework, we use blood oxygenation level dependent activity from multiple brain regions to estimate posterior distributions on the correlation trajectory. We demonstrate the utility of this DFC estimation framework by analyzing its performance on simulated data, and by estimating correlation dynamics in resting state fMRI data from a patient with a disorder of consciousness (DoC). Our work advances the state-of-the-art in DFC analysis and its principled use in DoC biomarker exploration.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32801606      PMCID: PMC7425228          DOI: 10.1109/ieeeconf44664.2019.9048807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Rec Asilomar Conf Signals Syst Comput        ISSN: 1058-6393


  9 in total

Review 1.  Functional and effective connectivity: a review.

Authors:  Karl J Friston
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011

2.  Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks.

Authors:  Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Alfonso Nieto-Castanon
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2012-07-19

Review 3.  Functional Networks in Disorders of Consciousness.

Authors:  Yelena G Bodien; Camille Chatelle; Brian L Edlow
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.420

4.  Functional networks reemerge during recovery of consciousness after acute severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Zachary D Threlkeld; Yelena G Bodien; Eric S Rosenthal; Joseph T Giacino; Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Ona Wu; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Brian L Edlow
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Increases in functional connectivity between prefrontal cortex and striatum during category learning.

Authors:  Evan G Antzoulatos; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Evaluating dynamic bivariate correlations in resting-state fMRI: a comparison study and a new approach.

Authors:  Martin A Lindquist; Yuting Xu; Mary Beth Nebel; Brain S Caffo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Early detection of consciousness in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Brian L Edlow; Camille Chatelle; Camille A Spencer; Catherine J Chu; Yelena G Bodien; Kathryn L O'Connor; Ronald E Hirschberg; Leigh R Hochberg; Joseph T Giacino; Eric S Rosenthal; Ona Wu
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Human consciousness is supported by dynamic complex patterns of brain signal coordination.

Authors:  A Demertzi; E Tagliazucchi; S Dehaene; G Deco; P Barttfeld; F Raimondo; C Martial; D Fernández-Espejo; B Rohaut; H U Voss; N D Schiff; A M Owen; S Laureys; L Naccache; J D Sitt
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Multimodal imaging of dynamic functional connectivity.

Authors:  Enzo Tagliazucchi; Helmut Laufs
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 4.003

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.