Literature DB >> 32801542

Retrospective Analysis of Subtarsal Incision in Maxillofacial Trauma.

Ravi Kumar Mahajan1, Kunal Gupta1,2, Krishnan Srinivasan1, Ankush Tambotra3, Sardar Mahipal Singh1, Amreen Kaur4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Subciliary, subtarsal and infraorbital incisions are the conventional cutaneous approaches to infraorbital rim and floor.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was developed with 30 patients reviewed over a period of 12 months. RESULT: No cases showed ectropion in minimum 12-month follow-up. Mild scleral show was present in 3 cases. At the end of 12 months, scar was invisible in 25 patients, mild in 4 patients and moderate in 1 patient who developed wound infection.
CONCLUSION: Subtarsal incision shows good result with very minimal post-operative complications. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Maxillofacial trauma; Subtarsal incision

Year:  2019        PMID: 32801542      PMCID: PMC7410898          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-019-01302-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  17 in total

1.  A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars.

Authors:  C Roques; Luc Teot
Journal:  Int J Low Extrem Wounds       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.057

2.  Rating the burn scar.

Authors:  T Sullivan; J Smith; J Kermode; E McIver; D J Courtemanche
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  1990 May-Jun

Review 3.  Cutaneous approaches to the lower lid and orbit.

Authors:  J R Werther
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability.

Authors:  M J Baryza; G A Baryza
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct

5.  The incidence of lower eyelid malposition after facial fracture repair: a retrospective study and meta-analysis comparing subtarsal, subciliary, and transconjunctival incisions.

Authors:  Emily B Ridgway; Chen Chen; Salih Colakoglu; Shiva Gautam; Bernard T Lee
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.

Authors:  Lieneke J Draaijers; Fenike R H Tempelman; Yvonne A M Botman; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Esther Middelkoop; Robert W Kreis; Paul P M van Zuijlen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices.

Authors:  Regina Fearmonti; Jennifer Bond; Detlev Erdmann; Howard Levinson
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-06-21

8.  An analysis of 2,067 cases of zygomatico-orbital fracture.

Authors:  E Ellis; A el-Attar; K F Moos
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Subciliary versus subtarsal approaches to orbitozygomatic fractures.

Authors:  Rod J Rohrich; Jeffrey E Janis; William P Adams
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Subtarsal approach for orbital floor repair: a long-term follow-up of 12 cases in a Jordanian teaching hospital.

Authors:  Zaid H Baqain; Ziad Malkawi; Abeer Hadidi; Lamis D Rajab
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.