Literature DB >> 32801534

Comparative Evaluation of IV Paracetamol Versus IV Dexmedetomidine in Inpatient Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.

K Guru1, S Adinarayanan1, B Krishnan2, Satyen Parida1, B Hemavathi1, Prasanna Udupi Bidkar1, K Narmadhalakshmi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Reconstructive surgeries following fractures in the maxillofacial region often involve considerable bone manipulation, and paracetamol is a commonly used analgesic medication in both intraoperative and postoperative periods. Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist, has both sedative and analgesic properties with minimal cardiorespiratory effects and has been used primarily for its sedative properties in oral and maxillofacial surgery. AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To compare the intraoperative analgesic requirements among patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery who receive IV paracetamol versus IV dexmedetomidine. The time to requirement for the first postoperative analgesic dose and safety and adverse events of both medications were also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 64 patients needing primary reconstructive surgery for facial fractures were recruited and divided into two groups for this double-blinded study. Patients were randomized to receive a preinduction dose of either IV paracetamol 1 g (Group P) or IV dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (Group D). Sedation scores (Ramsay sedation scale), maximal interincisal distance and pain scores at maximal mouth opening (visual analogue scale) were assessed in both groups just prior to and after the administration of the study drugs. After induction, Group P and Group D received a maintenance dose of normal saline and dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg/h) during the intraoperative period, respectively. Standard noninvasive cardiorespiratory monitoring was done for the entire duration of surgery. Following extubation, postoperative pain scores and the time to request for first analgesic dose in either group were recorded.
RESULTS: The time taken to perform the surgery was comparable in both groups. There was a significant difference between the groups in visual analogue scores and interincisal distance after the bolus dose (p < 0.05). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower in Group D at around 150 and 175 min of surgery. While the intraoperative fentanyl consumption was comparable in both groups, the time to request for the first analgesic dose in the postoperative period was significantly delayed in Group P (p < 0.05). No adverse cardiopulmonary events were observed in either group.
CONCLUSION: The intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic requirements and hemodynamic stability were comparable in IV paracetamol and dexmedetomidine groups. Dexmedetomidine did not confer any enhanced analgesia effect in the postoperative period. More research examining the role of dexmedetomidine for longer duration inpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery is needed. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: http://ClinicalTrials.gov (No. CTRI/2017/08/009468). © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analgesia; Dexmedetomidine; Inpatient; Maxillofacial; Paracetamol

Year:  2019        PMID: 32801534      PMCID: PMC7410910          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-019-01264-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  21 in total

1.  Prophylactic antiemetics in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a requiem?

Authors:  Mohan Alexander; Balasubramanian Krishnan; V Yuvraj
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 2.  Benefit of general anesthesia monitored by bispectral index compared with monitoring guided only by clinical parameters. Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carlos Rogério Degrandi Oliveira; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Victor Moisés Nunes
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-04-14

3.  Effect of dexmedetomidine on bleeding during tympanoplasty or septorhinoplasty.

Authors:  M Durmus; A K But; Z Dogan; A Yucel; M C Miman; M O Ersoy
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: Part II: Crossover comparison of the analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Luis I Cortinez; Yung-Wei Hsu; Sam T Sum-Ping; Christopher Young; John C Keifer; David Macleod; Kerri M Robertson; David R Wright; Eugene W Moretti; Jacques Somma
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans.

Authors:  T J Ebert; J E Hall; J A Barney; T D Uhrich; M D Colinco
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Dexmedetomidine injection into the locus ceruleus produces antinociception.

Authors:  T Z Guo; J Y Jiang; A E Buttermann; M Maze
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Evaluation of the advantageous anesthetic properties of dexmedetomidine used as hypotensive agent compared with nitroglycerin in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Duangdee Rummasak; Benjamas Apipan
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Dexmedetomidine as an Additive to Local Anesthesia: A Step to Development in Dentistry.

Authors:  Virendra Singh; Manju Thepra; Shruti Kirti; Prashant Kumar; Kannu Priya
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Dexmedetomidine attenuates sympathoadrenal response to tracheal intubation and reduces perioperative anaesthetic requirement.

Authors:  Varshali M Keniya; Sushma Ladi; Ramesh Naphade
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-07

10.  A comparative study of the efficacy of intravenous Paracetamol and Dexmedetomidine on peri-operative hemodynamics and post-operative analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sarbari Swaika; Nilakshi Parta; Surajit Chattopadhyay; Bikash Bisui; Sumantra Sarathi Banarjee; Somjit Chattarjee
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2013 Sep-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.