Literature DB >> 32798271

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies are stable in convalescent plasma when stored at 4° Celsius for at least 6 weeks.

Daniel Stadlbauer1, Ian Baine2, Fatima Amanat1,3, Kaijun Jiang1, Kimberly Lally2, Florian Krammer1, Jeffrey S Jhang2, Suzanne A Arinsburg2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32798271      PMCID: PMC7461441          DOI: 10.1111/trf.16047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.337


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor As nations around the world continue to address the public health crisis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID19), the global medical and scientific communities continue to search for and develop therapeutic strategies for patients. To date, remdesivir presents one such option and can shorten the duration of hospitalization in patients with severe disease. Convalescent plasma (CP) has presented another option, with its use and safety supported by numerous case series and retrospective studies.2, 3, 4 While its degree of effectiveness has been variable, there is general agreement that it acts as a supportive adjunctive therapy in patients with moderate to severe disease.2, 4 Current CP protocols such as the Mayo Clinic Early Access Program (EAP) specify that once thawed, CP may be stored for up to 5 days at 4°C. Presumably, this is intended to mimic current guidelines which apply to thawed plasma (TPL), which specify a similar shelf‐life. However, the rationale for this guideline stems from the fact that under normal circumstances, donor plasma is transfused or exchanged therapeutically for the purposes of correcting or preventing a coagulation factor deficiency, to replace deficient factors necessary for hemostatic balance such as ADAMTS13, or to restore complement‐regulatory factors in the setting of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. For these purposes, TPL is largely considered equivalent to fresh frozen plasma, with the exception of decreases in Factors V and VIII activity levels, and several other components.5, 6 However, the therapeutic goal of CP transfusion is to deliver passive immunity to the patient via antibodies. Studies demonstrating antibody stability under refrigerated conditions have largely focused on peripheral blood samples stored for several days.7, 8 However, studies describing the stability of antibodies in refrigerated donor plasma over longer periods are lacking. Here, we demonstrate the long‐term stability of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 spike antibodies in donor CP samples collected at a local blood donor center for transfusion. After thawing 15 CP units, segments were sampled and anti‐spike antibody titers were determined via enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Segments from five non‐CP units were sampled as a negative control. All samples were then stored at 4°C, and plasma endpoint titers were re‐evaluated at 14, 28, and 42 days. We detected no reduction in antibody titers for any of the samples (Table 1). The anti‐spike ELISA assay demonstrates a between‐run %CV ranging from 6.3% at an antibody concentration of 0.3 mcg/mL, to 23% at a concentration of 0.01875 mcg/mL. Therefore, the perceived decrease in titer for most samples between days 1 and 7, and the perceived increase between days 28 and 42 reflects the serial dilution cutoff values of the ELISA assay itself and run‐to‐run variation, and are not reflective of a true change. This is supported by the results obtained when the area under the curve (AUC) values for raw absorbance data are calculated, and show no significant variation over time (Figure 1). While our study does not address the neutralization capacity of these antibodies, previous studies demonstrate significant correlation between spike antibody titers and neutralization capacity of plasma and serum samples.
TABLE 1

Spike antibody endpoint titers at days 1, 14, 28, and 42 of storage at 4°C, as determined by ELISA. Samples N1‐N5 represent negative control plasma from random donor units and P1‐P15 represent CP samples. We note the presence of one negative control unit that demonstrates detectable titers and one with titers at the lower limit of detection; this may reflect a COVID‐convalescent donor in the general population that did not donate convalescent plasma specifically

SampleTiter: day 1Titer: day 14Titer: day 28Titer: day 42
N1501005050
N2NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
N3NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
N4NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
N5200200100100
P1800400400800
P23200320016003200
P3800800400800
P43200160016003200
P5160016008001600
P616008008001600
P7160016008001600
P8800400400800
P9400400400400
P10800800800800
P1116001600800800
P12400400400400
P131600160016001600
P141600160016001600
P15800800800800
FIGURE 1

Spike antibody levels at days 1, 14, 28, and 42 of storage at 4°C, as determined by ELISA, displayed as AUC values, to account for inter‐run variability of the assay. Samples N1‐N5 represent negative control plasma from random donor units, and samples P1‐15 represent CP samples

Spike antibody endpoint titers at days 1, 14, 28, and 42 of storage at 4°C, as determined by ELISA. Samples N1‐N5 represent negative control plasma from random donor units and P1‐P15 represent CP samples. We note the presence of one negative control unit that demonstrates detectable titers and one with titers at the lower limit of detection; this may reflect a COVID‐convalescent donor in the general population that did not donate convalescent plasma specifically Spike antibody levels at days 1, 14, 28, and 42 of storage at 4°C, as determined by ELISA, displayed as AUC values, to account for inter‐run variability of the assay. Samples N1‐N5 represent negative control plasma from random donor units, and samples P1‐15 represent CP samples We do note that our findings are limited by several factors. First, while limited case series have identified that CP may be effective in reducing morbidity and overall mortality, its efficacy has not been formally evaluated in large randomized clinical trials. Similarly, while there is correlation between spike antibody titers and neutralization capacity, as well as historical basis for the antibodies themselves as a cause of therapeutic benefit in CP, it is still unknown in the setting of COVID‐19 if the anti‐spike antibodies are the source of therapeutic benefit. It is well‐established at this point that COVID‐19 is associated with significant coagulopathy, and it may be possible that coagulation or other factors provided in plasma are what provide therapeutic benefit, which may have limited stability past 5 days. This would need to be formally determined by a randomized trial comparing CP to standard frozen plasma. There may also be a slight increase in risk for septic reactions, though we believe this risk remains low, given the estimated incidence of septic reactions from red cell units of 1 in 250 000‐ 500 000, a product which in some cases is also stored for up to 42 days at 4°C. Our findings demonstrate long‐term stability of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 spike antibodies in donor CP for at least 42 days when stored under refrigerated conditions. This finding may support a rationale for therapeutic use of CP beyond 5 days post‐thaw, as antibody levels are maintained. It should be noted that extension of the storage window to 42 days would require amendment to the current Emergency IND protocol established by the United States FDA or the Mayo Clinic EAP, but could be of significant value as it would prevent wastage of this precious resource in situations where planned CP transfusions are canceled after the product has been thawed. Additionally, it may allow for transport to more remote locations where monitored freezer facilities are limited or unavailable, potentially making this important treatment option available to patient populations with limited access to CP.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

F.K., D.S. and F.A. are listed as inventors of the anti‐SARS‐CoV2 immunoassay used in this work, which Mount Sinai Hospital has licensed to commercial entities. I.B., K.L., K.J., J.S.J. and S.A.O. have declared no conflicts of interest.
  11 in total

1.  Early safety indicators of COVID-19 convalescent plasma in 5,000 patients.

Authors:  Michael J Joyner; R Scott Wright; DeLisa Fairweather; Jonathon W Senefeld; Katelyn A Bruno; Stephen A Klassen; Rickey E Carter; Allan M Klompas; Chad C Wiggins; John Ra Shepherd; Robert F Rea; Emily R Whelan; Andrew J Clayburn; Matthew R Spiegel; Patrick W Johnson; Elizabeth R Lesser; Sarah E Baker; Kathryn F Larson; Juan G Ripoll; Kylie J Andersen; David O Hodge; Katie L Kunze; Matthew R Buras; Matthew Np Vogt; Vitaly Herasevich; Joshua J Dennis; Riley J Regimbal; Philippe R Bauer; Janis E Blair; Camille M van Buskirk; Jeffrey L Winters; James R Stubbs; Nigel S Paneth; Nicole C Verdun; Peter Marks; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Comparison and stability of ADAMTS13 activity in therapeutic plasma products.

Authors:  Erik A Scott; Kathleen E Puca; Bradley C Pietz; Brian K Duchateau; Kenneth D Friedman
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Evaluation and comparison of coagulation factor activity in fresh-frozen plasma and 24-hour plasma at thaw and after 120 hours of 1 to 6°C storage.

Authors:  Erik Scott; Kathleen Puca; Jennifer Heraly; Jerome Gottschall; Kenneth Friedman
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  One-month stability study of a biosimilar of infliximab (Remsima®) after dilution and storage at 4°C and 25°C.

Authors:  V Vieillard; A Astier; C Sauzay; M Paul
Journal:  Ann Pharm Fr       Date:  2016-09-19

5.  Long-term stability of trastuzumab in plasma and whole blood samples stored under different conditions.

Authors:  Jonathan González-García; Fernando Gutiérrez-Nicolás; Gloria Julia Nazco-Casariego; María Micaela Viña-Romero
Journal:  Farm Hosp       Date:  2019-03-01

6.  Convalescent plasma treatment of severe COVID-19: a propensity score-matched control study.

Authors:  Judith A Aberg; Nicole M Bouvier; Sean T H Liu; Hung-Mo Lin; Ian Baine; Ania Wajnberg; Jeffrey P Gumprecht; Farah Rahman; Denise Rodriguez; Pranai Tandon; Adel Bassily-Marcus; Jeffrey Bander; Charles Sanky; Amy Dupper; Allen Zheng; Freddy T Nguyen; Fatima Amanat; Daniel Stadlbauer; Deena R Altman; Benjamin K Chen; Florian Krammer; Damodara Rao Mendu; Adolfo Firpo-Betancourt; Matthew A Levin; Emilia Bagiella; Arturo Casadevall; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Jeffrey S Jhang; Suzanne A Arinsburg; David L Reich
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans.

Authors:  Fatima Amanat; Daniel Stadlbauer; Shirin Strohmeier; Thi H O Nguyen; Veronika Chromikova; Meagan McMahon; Kaijun Jiang; Guha Asthagiri Arunkumar; Denise Jurczyszak; Jose Polanco; Maria Bermudez-Gonzalez; Giulio Kleiner; Teresa Aydillo; Lisa Miorin; Daniel S Fierer; Luz Amarilis Lugo; Erna Milunka Kojic; Jonathan Stoever; Sean T H Liu; Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles; Philip L Felgner; Thomas Moran; Adolfo García-Sastre; Daniel Caplivski; Allen C Cheng; Katherine Kedzierska; Olli Vapalahti; Jussi M Hepojoki; Viviana Simon; Florian Krammer
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients with Convalescent Plasma.

Authors:  Eric Salazar; Katherine K Perez; Madiha Ashraf; Jian Chen; Brian Castillo; Paul A Christensen; Taryn Eubank; David W Bernard; Todd N Eagar; S Wesley Long; Sishir Subedi; Randall J Olsen; Christopher Leveque; Mary R Schwartz; Monisha Dey; Cheryl Chavez-East; John Rogers; Ahmed Shehabeldin; David Joseph; Guy Williams; Karen Thomas; Faisal Masud; Christina Talley; Katharine G Dlouhy; Bevin V Lopez; Curt Hampton; Jason Lavinder; Jimmy D Gollihar; Andre C Maranhao; Gregory C Ippolito; Matthew O Saavedra; Concepcion C Cantu; Prasanti Yerramilli; Layne Pruitt; James M Musser
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial.

Authors:  Yeming Wang; Dingyu Zhang; Guanhua Du; Ronghui Du; Jianping Zhao; Yang Jin; Shouzhi Fu; Ling Gao; Zhenshun Cheng; Qiaofa Lu; Yi Hu; Guangwei Luo; Ke Wang; Yang Lu; Huadong Li; Shuzhen Wang; Shunan Ruan; Chengqing Yang; Chunlin Mei; Yi Wang; Dan Ding; Feng Wu; Xin Tang; Xianzhi Ye; Yingchun Ye; Bing Liu; Jie Yang; Wen Yin; Aili Wang; Guohui Fan; Fei Zhou; Zhibo Liu; Xiaoying Gu; Jiuyang Xu; Lianhan Shang; Yi Zhang; Lianjun Cao; Tingting Guo; Yan Wan; Hong Qin; Yushen Jiang; Thomas Jaki; Frederick G Hayden; Peter W Horby; Bin Cao; Chen Wang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  COVID-19 and its implications for thrombosis and anticoagulation.

Authors:  Jean M Connors; Jerrold H Levy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 25.476

View more
  10 in total

1.  Urgent Need to Regulate Convalescent Plasma Differently from Thawed Plasma.

Authors:  Daniele Focosi; Albert Farrugia
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Kinetics and isotype assessment of antibodies targeting the spike protein receptor-binding domain of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 in COVID-19 patients as a function of age, biological sex and disease severity.

Authors:  Nancy R Graham; Annalis N Whitaker; Camilla A Strother; Ashley K Miles; Dore Grier; Benjamin D McElvany; Emily A Bruce; Matthew E Poynter; Kristen K Pierce; Beth D Kirkpatrick; Renee D Stapleton; Gary An; Eline van den Broek-Altenburg; Jason W Botten; Jessica W Crothers; Sean A Diehl
Journal:  Clin Transl Immunology       Date:  2020-10-07

3.  Kinetics of anti-SARS-COV2 spike protein IgG and IgA antibodies at 4°C: Implications for convalescent plasma stability.

Authors:  Daniele Focosi; Giovanna Moscato; Mauro Pistello; Fabrizio Maggi
Journal:  Transfus Med       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 2.019

4.  Convalescent Plasma for the Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis.

Authors:  Henry T Peng; Shawn G Rhind; Andrew Beckett
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2021-04-07

Review 5.  Convalescent Plasma Therapy for Management of COVID-19: Perspectives and Deployment in the Current Global Pandemic.

Authors:  Nandeeta Samad; Temitayo Eniola Sodunke; Hasan Al Banna; Ashmita Sapkota; Aneeka Nawar Fatema; Katia Iskandar; Dilshad Jahan; Timothy Craig Hardcastle; Tanzina Nusrat; Tajkera Sultana Chowdhury; Mainul Haque
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-11-23

6.  The art of the possible in approaching efficacy trials for COVID19 convalescent plasma.

Authors:  Daniele Focosi; Albert Farrugia
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  COVID-19 serological survey using micro blood sampling.

Authors:  Melissa M Matthews; Tae Gyun Kim; Satoshi Shibata; Noriko Shibata; Christian Butcher; Jaekyung Hyun; Keon Young Kim; Theodore Robb; Siang Sheng Jheng; Masashi Narita; Tomoari Mori; Mary Collins; Matthias Wolf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Surrogate test performance for SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) for convalescent plasma (CCP): How useful could they be?

Authors:  Silvano Wendel; Roberta Fachini; Rita C L Fontão-Wendel; Ralyria Mello; Carlos Vinícius Velasquez; Rafael Rahal Guaragna Machado; Mayra Altobelli Brito; Marcelo Amaral; Camila Pereira Soares; Ruth Achkar; Patrícia Scuracchio; Sandra Cristina Miyaji; Melina Santos Erdens; Edison Luiz Durigon
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  How do I implement an outpatient program for the administration of convalescent plasma for COVID-19?

Authors:  Evan M Bloch; Aaron A R Tobian; Shmuel Shoham; Daniel F Hanley; Thomas J Gniadek; Edward R Cachay; Barry R Meisenberg; Kimberly Kafka; Christi Marshall; Sonya L Heath; Aarthi Shenoy; James H Paxton; Adam Levine; Donald Forthal; Yuriko Fukuta; Moises A Huaman; Alyssa Ziman; Jill Adamski; Jonathan Gerber; Daniel Cruser; Seble G Kassaye; Giselle S Mosnaim; Bela Patel; Ryan A Metcalf; Shweta Anjan; Ronald B Reisler; Anusha Yarava; Karen Lane; Nichol McBee; Amy Gawad; Jay S Raval; Martin Zand; Matthew Abinante; Patrick B Broderick; Arturo Casadevall; David Sullivan; Kelly A Gebo
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.337

10.  COVID-19 Serosurvey of Frontline Healthcare Workers in Western Australia.

Authors:  Herbert Ludewick; Rebecca Hahn; Claire Italiano; Lynette Pereira; Daniel Fatovich; Jemma Saxton; Richard Hunt; Kwok M Ho; Peter Boan; Warren Pavey
Journal:  J Epidemiol Glob Health       Date:  2022-09-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.