Literature DB >> 32796184

The Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Bacteremia and Fungemia in Hospitalized Patients Using Electronic Health Record Data.

Sivasubramanium V Bhavani1, Zachary Lonjers2, Kyle A Carey1, Majid Afshar3, Emily R Gilbert3, Nirav S Shah2, Elbert S Huang1, Matthew M Churpek4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Bacteremia and fungemia can cause life-threatening illness with high mortality rates, which increase with delays in antimicrobial therapy. The objective of this study is to develop machine learning models to predict blood culture results at the time of the blood culture order using routine data in the electronic health record.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a large, multicenter inpatient data.
SETTING: Two academic tertiary medical centers between the years 2007 and 2018.
SUBJECTS: All hospitalized patients who received a blood culture during hospitalization.
INTERVENTIONS: The dataset was partitioned temporally into development and validation cohorts: the logistic regression and gradient boosting machine models were trained on the earliest 80% of hospital admissions and validated on the most recent 20%.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 252,569 blood culture days-defined as nonoverlapping 24-hour periods in which one or more blood cultures were ordered. In the validation cohort, there were 50,514 blood culture days, with 3,762 cases of bacteremia (7.5%) and 370 cases of fungemia (0.7%). The gradient boosting machine model for bacteremia had significantly higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.78 [95% CI 0.77-0.78]) than the logistic regression model (0.73 [0.72-0.74]) (p < 0.001). The model identified a high-risk group with over 30 times the occurrence rate of bacteremia in the low-risk group (27.4% vs 0.9%; p < 0.001). Using the low-risk cut-off, the model identifies bacteremia with 98.7% sensitivity. The gradient boosting machine model for fungemia had high discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.88 [95% CI 0.86-0.90]). The high-risk fungemia group had 252 fungemic cultures compared with one fungemic culture in the low-risk group (5.0% vs 0.02%; p < 0.001). Further, the high-risk group had a mortality rate 60 times higher than the low-risk group (28.2% vs 0.4%; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our novel models identified patients at low and high-risk for bacteremia and fungemia using routinely collected electronic health record data. Further research is needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and impact of model implementation in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32796184      PMCID: PMC7554143          DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   9.296


  42 in total

1.  A prediction rule for estimating the risk of bacteremia in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Miquel Falguera; Javier Trujillano; Sílvia Caro; Rosario Menéndez; Jordi Carratalà; Agustín Ruiz-González; Manuel Vilà; Mercè García; José Manuel Porcel; Antoni Torres
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Molecular diagnosis of sepsis: New aspects and recent developments.

Authors:  O Liesenfeld; L Lehman; K-P Hunfeld; G Kost
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2014-03-14

3.  Procalcitonin fails to predict bacteremia in SIRS patients: a cohort study.

Authors:  M Hoenigl; R B Raggam; J Wagner; F Prueller; A J Grisold; E Leitner; K Seeber; J Prattes; T Valentin; I Zollner-Schwetz; G Schilcher; R Krause
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Incidence of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella Infections in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Jennifer McDanel; Marin Schweizer; Victoria Crabb; Richard Nelson; Matthew Samore; Karim Khader; Amy E Blevins; Daniel Diekema; Hsiu-Yin Chiang; Rajeshwari Nair; Eli Perencevich
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Early diagnosis of bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit using machine-learning algorithms.

Authors:  Michael Roimi; Ami Neuberger; Anat Shrot; Mical Paul; Yuval Geffen; Yaron Bar-Lavie
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Application of dynamic pulse pressure and vasopressor tools for predicting outcomes in patients with sepsis in intensive care units.

Authors:  Wen-Feng Fang; Chi-Han Huang; Yu-Mu Chen; Kai-Yin Hung; Ya-Chun Chang; Chiung-Yu Lin; Ying-Tang Fang; Ya-Ting Chang; Hung-Cheng Chen; Kuo-Tung Huang; Huang-Chih Chang; Yun-Che Chen; Yi-Hsi Wang; Chin-Chou Wang; Meng-Chih Lin
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.425

7.  Temporal changes in the incidence and 30-day mortality associated with bacteremia in hospitalized patients from 1992 through 2006: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Mette Søgaard; Mette Nørgaard; Claus Dethlefsen; Henrik Carl Schønheyder
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Impact of blood cultures drawn by phlebotomy on contamination rates and health care costs in a hospital emergency department.

Authors:  Rita M Gander; Linda Byrd; Michael DeCrescenzo; Shaina Hirany; Michelle Bowen; Judy Baughman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  A multicenter trial to compare blood culture with polymerase chain reaction in severe human sepsis.

Authors:  Frank Bloos; Frank Hinder; Karsten Becker; Svea Sachse; Armand Mekontso Dessap; Eberhard Straube; Vincent Cattoir; Christian Brun-Buisson; Konrad Reinhart; Georg Peters; Michael Bauer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin, lactate, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein for predicting bacteremia in adult patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  Chiung-Tsung Lin; Jang-Jih Lu; Yu-Ching Chen; Victor C Kok; Jorng-Tzong Horng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  2 in total

1.  Identifying infected patients using semi-supervised and transfer learning.

Authors:  Fereshteh S Bashiri; John R Caskey; Anoop Mayampurath; Nicole Dussault; Jay Dumanian; Sivasubramanium V Bhavani; Kyle A Carey; Emily R Gilbert; Christopher J Winslow; Nirav S Shah; Dana P Edelson; Majid Afshar; Matthew M Churpek
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 7.942

2.  Clinical predictive models of invasive Candida infection: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Adriana M Rauseo; Abdullah Aljorayid; Margaret A Olsen; Lindsey Larson; Kim L Lipsey; William G Powderly; Andrej Spec
Journal:  Med Mycol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.747

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.