| Literature DB >> 32791986 |
Marius Kemper1, Mona Moradzadeh2, Eugen Bellon2, Ahmad S Bahar2, Rainer Grotelüschen2, Matthias Reeh2, Jakob R Izbicki2, Kai Bachmann.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thymic epithelial tumors are rare neoplasias. There are no internationally accepted standards to treat this complex oncological disease. The studies on which our knowledge is based frequently have methodological weaknesses. If the tumor is resectable, complete surgical excision is currently the first-line therapy. Thymic epithelial tumors respond to radiation. The therapeutic benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy depends on tumor stage. To validate and improve treatment, we share our current experiences with clinical management and surgical intervention.Entities:
Keywords: Clavien-Dindo; Masaoka; Neoadjuvant therapy; Survival; Thymectomy; Thymic epithelial tumors
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32791986 PMCID: PMC7427055 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01988-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Classification of thymomas according to Masaoka-Koga stage [14]
| Stage | Masaoka-Koga staging system |
|---|---|
| I | Grossly and microscopically completely encapsulated tumor |
| II a | Microscopic transcapsular invasion |
| II b | Macroscopic invasion into thymic or surrounding fatty tissue, or grossly adherent to but not breaking through mediastinal pleura or pericardium |
| III | Macroscopic invasion into a neighboring organ (i.e., pericardium, great vessel, or lung) |
| IV a | Pleural or pericardial metastases |
| IV b | Lymphogenous or hematogenous metastasis |
Types of thymic tumors according to WHO histological classification [16]
| WHO type | Histologic description |
|---|---|
| A | Medullary thymoma |
| AB | Mixed thymoma |
| B1 | Predominantly cortical thymoma |
| B2 | Cortical thymoma |
| B3 | Well-differentiated thymic carcinoma |
| C | Thymic carcinoma |
Classification of complications according to Clavien-Dindo
| Grade | Definition |
|---|---|
| I | Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions. Allowed therapeutic regimens are drugs such as antiemetics, antipyretics, analgetics, diuretics, and electrolytes and physiotherapy. This grade also includes wound infections opened at the bedside. |
| II | Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included. |
| IIIa | Requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention: Intervention not under general anesthesia |
| IIIb | Requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention: Intervention under general anesthesia. |
| IV a | Life-threatening complication (including CNS complications) requiring IC/ICU-management: single-organ dysfunction (including dialysis) |
| IV b | Life-threatening complication (including CNS complications) requiring IC/ICU-management: multiorgan dysfunction |
| V | Death of a patient |
Frequency of postoperative complications
| Complication | No. | % |
|---|---|---|
| Respiratory failure requiring reintubation | 2 | 5 |
| Pneumonia | 4 | 10 |
| Pneumothorax | 2 | 5 |
| Thrombosis of the superior vena cava | 2 | 5 |
| Postoperative bleeding | 4 | 10 |
| Pericardial tamponade | 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 4 | |
| Catheter-related bloodstream infection | 1 | 3 |
| Systemic inflammatory response syndrome | 2 | 4 |
| Myasthenic crisis | 2 | 4 |
| Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis | 1 | 3 |
| Exitus letalis | 1 | 3 |
Patient characteristics and a single-predictor analysis of overall survival
| Characteristics | No. | % | Mean survival (95 % CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.870 | |||
| Female | 26 | 65 | 119 (95–144) | |
| Male | 14 | 35 | 118 (76–161) | |
| Age, years | 0.755 | |||
| ≤ 60 | 26 | 65 | 121 (93–151) | |
| > 60 | 14 | 35 | 105 (70–141) | |
| Masaoka-Koga stage | ||||
| I | 10 | 27 | 142 (117–168) | |
| II | 15 | 41 | 111 (83–138) | |
| III | 4 | 11 | 72 (44–100) | |
| IV | 8 | 22 | 21 (10–32) | |
| Surgical technique | ||||
| Minimally invasive | 20 | 50 | 162 (139–185) | |
| Open | 20 | 50 | 79 (48–111) | |
| Resection status | ||||
| R0 | 27 | 68 | 142 (115–168) | |
| R1 | 11 | 28 | 71 (40–102) | |
| R2 | 2 | 5 | 23 (16–29)) | |
| Adjuvant radiotherapy | 0.578 | |||
| Yes | 15 | 37 | 84 (60–109) | |
| No | 25 | 62 | 126 (96–156) | |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | ||||
| Yes | 8 | 20 | 38 (14–62) | |
| No | 32 | 80 | 138 (113–162) | |
| Clavien-Dindo classification | ||||
| I–IIIa | 32 | 80 | 135 (109–161) | |
| IIIb–IV | 8 | 20 | 55 (20–90) | |
Fig. 1Kaplan-Meier survival curves plotted according to Masaoka-Koga. Classification according to Masaoka-Koga enables a highly significant stratification of survival (P < 0.001, log-rank test)
Baseline characteristics: treatment and complications (chi-square test)
| Surgery technique | Adjuvant chemotherapy | Adjuvant radiotherapy | Clavien-Dindo | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | Minimally invasive | open | Yes | No | Yes | No | I–IIIa | IIIb–IV | ||||
| Gender | 1 | 0.868 | 0.608 | 0.868 | ||||||||
| Female | 13 | 13 | 5 | 21 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 5 | ||||
| Male | 7 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 3 | ||||
| Age, years | 0.440 | 0.507 | 0.123 | 0.868 | ||||||||
| ≤ 60 | 14 | 12 | 6 | 20 | 12 | 14 | 21 | 5 | ||||
| > 60 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 12 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 3 | ||||
| Masaoka stage | 0.256 | |||||||||||
| I | 7 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 0 | ||||
| II | 10 | 5 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 5 | ||||
| III | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| IV | 1 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | ||||
| Surgery technique | – | 0.114 | 0.744 | |||||||||
| Minimally invasive | – | – | 2 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 19 | 1 | ||||
| Open | – | – | 6 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 13 | 7 | ||||
| Residual tumor | 0.938 | 0.331 | 0.637 | |||||||||
| R0 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 26 | 8 | 19 | 22 | 5 | ||||
| R1 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 3 | ||||
| R2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | ||||
| Adjuvant radiotherapy | 0.744 | 0.410 | – | 0.414 | ||||||||
| Yes | 7 | 8 | 4 | 11 | – | – | 11 | 4 | ||||
| No | 13 | 12 | 4 | 21 | – | – | 21 | 4 | ||||
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.114 | – | 0.414 | 0.553 | ||||||||
| Yes | 2 | 6 | – | – | 4 | 4 | 7 | 1 | ||||
| No | 18 | 14 | – | – | 11 | 21 | 25 | 7 | ||||
| Clavien-Dindo | 0.553 | 0.414 | ||||||||||
| I–IIIa | 19 | 13 | 7 | 25 | 11 | 21 | – | – | ||||
| IIIb–IV | 1 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 4 | – | – | ||||
Fig. 2Kaplan-Meier survival curves plotted according to resection status. Patients with incomplete tumor resection show poorer survival (P = 0.002)
Fig. 3Kaplan-Meier survival curves plotted according to the severity of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade). Severe complications, in particular those classified as grade IIIb, are accompanied long term by a distinctly reduced survival (P < 0.001)
A multiple predictor survival analysis for overall survival
| HR | 95 % Cl for HR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Masaoka-Koga stage (I + II vs. III + IV) | 1.145–20.775 | ||
| Complete resection (yes vs. no) | 1.477 | 0.419–5.204 | 0.544 |
| Clavien-Dindo (I–IIIa vs. IIIb–IV) | 1.447–16.623 | ||
| Adjuvant chemotherapy (no vs. yes) | 2.803 | 0.530–14.816 | 0.225 |