| Literature DB >> 32790867 |
Arundhati Maitra1, Dimitrios Evangelopoulos2, Alina Chrzastek1, Liam T Martin1,3, Aidan Hanrath2, Ellie Chapman1, Helen C Hailes3, Marc Lipman4, Timothy D McHugh2, Simon J Waddell5, Sanjib Bhakta1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rise of antimicrobial drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis coupled with the shortage of new antibiotics has elevated TB to a major global health priority. Repurposing drugs developed or used for other conditions has gained special attention in the current scenario of accelerated drug development for several global infectious diseases. In a similar effort, previous studies revealed that carprofen, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, selectively inhibited the growth of replicating, non-replicating and MDR clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32790867 PMCID: PMC7566368 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaa307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother ISSN: 0305-7453 Impact factor: 5.790
Figure 1.Whole-cell phenotypic effects of carprofen treatment on M. smegmatis. (a) Inhibition of efflux pumps in the presence of subMIC concentration of carprofen (CRP) (0.25× MIC, 62.5 mg/L) as seen through the accumulation of EtBr and resulting increase in the fluorescence readout. Verapamil (VP) (0.25× MIC, 50 mg/L) was used as positive efflux pump inhibitor control. Untreated cells served as the negative control. The experiments were performed in triplicate (n = 3) and the graph was plotted using the averages. (b) Efflux of EtBr from pre-saturated cells in the presence of carprofen and verapamil, showing retention of the efflux pump substrate. (c) Complete inhibition of biofilm formation is observed in the presence of 250 mg/L (1× MIC) of carprofen in the PPE tubes and 96-well plates within a timescale of 5 days. Confocal images of stained extracellular DNA and lipids show distinct differences between carprofen-treated and untreated biofilms, especially their wrinkled surface, as captured in the z-axis images. (d) Concentration-dependent effect of carprofen on biofilm formation, as quantitated by crystal violet staining of the biofilms. Panels e, f and g show the amount of EPS, namely lipids, proteins and carbohydrates that make up the biofilms of the untreated control and carprofen-treated biofilms (0.25× MIC).
Figure 2.Transcriptional response of M. tuberculosis H37Rv to 4 h carprofen exposure (10× MIC, 400 mg/L). (a) Heatmap showing the NSAID drug signatures. Each column represents a drug treatment biological replicate and each row represents the expression profile of a gene relative to carrier control. Red colouring indicates induction and blue indicates repression. CRP, carprofen; IBP, ibuprofen; KETO, ketoprofen; INH, isoniazid; CC, carrier control. The genes identified as significantly differentially expressed in each drug comparison are marked as DEG. (b) Total number of genes that were significantly up- and down-regulated by drug exposure. (c) Hierarchical clustering of M. tuberculosis responses to drug exposure, showing similarity between replicate treatments (carprofen represented as CAR here). (d) The number of genes significantly modified by each drug exposure in comparison with carrier control. Overlap of genes induced or repressed by exposure to NSAIDs, showing minimal response to ketoprofen and discrete isoniazid signature.
Figure 3.Chemical structure of carprofen (1) and 2-(6-chloro-9H-carbazol-3-yl)acetic acid (2).