Literature DB >> 32790658

Notes from the Field: Seroprevalence Estimates of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Convenience Sample - Oregon, May 11-June 15, 2020.

Melissa Sutton1, Paul Cieslak1, Meghan Linder1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32790658      PMCID: PMC7440123          DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


× No keyword cloud information.
The first known case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Oregon was diagnosed on February 28, 2020. Through May 31, a total of 4,243 COVID-19 cases in Oregon were confirmed by nucleic acid testing for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, yielding a cumulative COVID-19 incidence of approximately 0.1%.* Because this rate does not account for persons who were infected but did not seek testing (e.g., those with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic infections), persons who chose not to be tested, or persons unable to access testing, the rate is believed to be lower than the true cumulative COVID-19 incidence in the state. A population-based seroprevalence survey can provide estimates of the cumulative incidence of infection more accurately than does nucleic acid testing by identifying additional persons who have had previous infections with SARS-CoV-2 but were not reported as COVID-19 cases. Seroprevalence estimates from several states and geographic areas within the United States vary from 1.0% to 6.9% (–). No seroprevalence estimates for SARS-CoV-2 infection are yet available for Oregon. To estimate the seroprevalence of infection with SARS-CoV-2 in Oregon, a cross-sectional, population-based convenience sample for SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody testing was collected from mid-May through mid-June, in alignment with the World Health Organization seroepidemiologic investigation protocol. Eighty-six facilities participating in CDC’s Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network and Oregon’s Electronic Surveillance System for the Early Notification of Community-based Epidemics were randomized and approached sequentially with a goal of recruiting 18 facilities to provide 50 specimens each. Facilities were asked to submit random subsamples of deidentified sera from patients of all ages visiting any ambulatory, emergency, or inpatient health care setting and to include the specimen collection date and the patient’s date of birth. Specimens were stored according to instructions provided by the test manufacturer and transported to the Oregon State Public Health Laboratory for testing with the Abbott Architect Laboratories SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassay. Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Park, Illinois) reports a sensitivity of 96.8% at ≥14 days after a positive polymerase chain reaction test result and specificity of 99.1%–100% (). Results from actual use support the reported analytical performance of this test (). Although 18 facilities were initially recruited, another facility was added through the same sequential approach because one facility was only able to submit 15 specimens. The facilities’ locations were approximately representative of the geographic distribution of Oregon’s population. During May 11–June 15, 2020, a total of 898 venous specimens (average from each facility = 47; range = 15–50) were collected from the 19 facilities; one specimen was discarded because of a laboratory error. This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with CDC policies and procedures, and institutional review board clearance was not required.** Stata (version 15.1; StataCorp) was used for all analyses. Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were detected in nine of 897 specimens, yielding an unadjusted seroprevalence of 1.0% (95% confidence interval = 0.2%–1.8%). Antibodies were not detected in any specimens from the 29 persons aged ≤17 years. Seroprevalence generally increased with age (chi-squared test for trend, p = 0.049) (Table).
TABLE

Estimated seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies among a convenience sample of deidentified serum specimens from 19 facilities participating in the Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network, by age group* — Oregon, May 11–June 15, 2020

Age group (yrs)No. of samples testedSARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive
No.% (95% CI)
0–4500 (0–52)
5–172400 (1–14)
18–4927410.4 (0–2.0)
50–6421110.5 (0–2.6)
65–7417831.7 (0.3–4.8)
75–8414432.1 (0.4–6.0)
≥856111.6 (0–8.8)
Total 897 9 1.0 (0.2–1.8)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

* Seroprevalence generally increased with age (chi-squared test for trend, p = 0.049).

† Abbott Architect Laboratories SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassay. Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Park, IL) reports a sensitivity of 96.8% at ≥14 days after a positive polymerase chain reaction test result and specificity of 99.1%–100%.

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval. * Seroprevalence generally increased with age (chi-squared test for trend, p = 0.049). † Abbott Architect Laboratories SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassay. Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Park, IL) reports a sensitivity of 96.8% at ≥14 days after a positive polymerase chain reaction test result and specificity of 99.1%–100%. The estimated seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a convenience sample of adult Oregonians was approximately 10 times the measured cumulative COVID-19 incidence obtained by nucleic acid testing, consistent with results from seven other U.S. states and geographic areas (4). This convenience sample, obtained from patients interacting with health care systems throughout the state, is not necessarily generalizable to the entire state population. Limitations of seroprevalence testing include false positivity in settings of low background prevalence such as Oregon, lack of antibody development by some infected persons, and in others, waning of antibodies to undetectable levels. The data suggest that a substantial number of COVID-19 cases in Oregon have gone undiagnosed and not reported and that a large portion of Oregon’s population remains susceptible to COVID-19 infection. Although the sample size was small, a pattern of increasing seroprevalence with age was observed. These findings are similar to those reported in a recent survey in neighboring Idaho (). Follow-up surveillance studies are planned in Oregon to reassess cumulative incidence as the pandemic progresses.
  4 in total

1.  Seroprevalence of Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in 10 Sites in the United States, March 23-May 12, 2020.

Authors:  Fiona P Havers; Carrie Reed; Travis Lim; Joel M Montgomery; John D Klena; Aron J Hall; Alicia M Fry; Deborah L Cannon; Cheng-Feng Chiang; Aridth Gibbons; Inna Krapiunaya; Maria Morales-Betoulle; Katherine Roguski; Mohammad Ata Ur Rasheed; Brandi Freeman; Sandra Lester; Lisa Mills; Darin S Carroll; S Michele Owen; Jeffrey A Johnson; Vera Semenova; Carina Blackmore; Debra Blog; Shua J Chai; Angela Dunn; Julie Hand; Seema Jain; Scott Lindquist; Ruth Lynfield; Scott Pritchard; Theresa Sokol; Lynn Sosa; George Turabelidze; Sharon M Watkins; John Wiesman; Randall W Williams; Stephanie Yendell; Jarad Schiffer; Natalie J Thornburg
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Population Point Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Based on a Statewide Random Sample - Indiana, April 25-29, 2020.

Authors:  Nir Menachemi; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Brian E Dixon; Thomas J Duszynski; William F Fadel; Kara K Wools-Kaloustian; Nadia Unruh Needleman; Kristina Box; Virginia Caine; Connor Norwood; Lindsay Weaver; Paul K Halverson
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Performance Characteristics of the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG Assay and Seroprevalence in Boise, Idaho.

Authors:  Andrew Bryan; Gregory Pepper; Mark H Wener; Susan L Fink; Chihiro Morishima; Anu Chaudhary; Keith R Jerome; Patrick C Mathias; Alexander L Greninger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Estimated Community Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies - Two Georgia Counties, April 28-May 3, 2020.

Authors:  Holly M Biggs; Jennifer B Harris; Lucy Breakwell; F Scott Dahlgren; Glen R Abedi; Christine M Szablewski; Jan Drobeniuc; Nirma D Bustamante; Olivia Almendares; Amy H Schnall; Zunera Gilani; Tiffany Smith; Laura Gieraltowski; Jeffrey A Johnson; Kristina L Bajema; Kelsey McDavid; Ilana J Schafer; Vickie Sullivan; Lili Punkova; Alexandra Tejada-Strop; Raiza Amiling; Claire P Mattison; Margaret M Cortese; S Elizabeth Ford; Lynn A Paxton; Cherie Drenzek; Jacqueline E Tate
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 17.586

  4 in total
  10 in total

1.  Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 serological assays for use in epidemiological surveillance in Scotland.

Authors:  Lindsay McDonald; Helen Wise; Frauke Muecksch; Daniel Poston; Sally Mavin; Kate Templeton; Elizabeth Furrie; Claire Richardson; Jaqueline McGuire; Lisa Jarvis; Kristen Malloy; Andrew McAuley; Norah Palmateer; Elizabeth Dickson; Theodora Hatziioannou; Paul Bieniasz; Sara Jenks
Journal:  J Clin Virol Plus       Date:  2021-06-14

2.  SARS-CoV-2 transmission among children and staff in daycare centres during a nationwide lockdown in France: a cross-sectional, multicentre, seroprevalence study.

Authors:  Eric Lachassinne; Loïc de Pontual; Marion Caseris; Mathie Lorrot; Carole Guilluy; Aurélie Naud; Marie-Aliette Dommergues; Didier Pinquier; Evelyne Wannepain; Elisabeth Hausherr; Camille Jung; Vincent Gajdos; Robert Cohen; Jean-Ralph Zahar; Ségolène Brichler; Romain Basmaci; Pierre-Yves Boelle; Coralie Bloch-Queyrat; Camille Aupiais
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2021-02-08

3.  Mapping a Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2 Seropositivity in the United States.

Authors:  Heather Kalish; Carleen Klumpp-Thomas; Sally Hunsberger; Holly Ann Baus; Michael P Fay; Nalyn Siripong; Jing Wang; Jennifer Hicks; Jennifer Mehalko; Jameson Travers; Matthew Drew; Kyle Pauly; Jacquelyn Spathies; Tran Ngo; Kenneth M Adusei; Maria Karkanitsa; Jennifer A Croker; Yan Li; Barry I Graubard; Lindsay Czajkowski; Olivia Belliveau; Cheryl Chairez; Kelly Snead; Peter Frank; Anandakumar Shunmugavel; Alison Han; Luca T Giurgea; Luz Angela Rosas; Rachel Bean; Rani Athota; Adriana Cervantes-Medina; Monica Gouzoulis; Brittany Heffelfinger; Shannon Valenti; Rocco Caldararo; Michelle M Kolberg; Andrew Kelly; Reid Simon; Saifullah Shafiq; Vanessa Wall; Susan Reed; Eric W Ford; Ravi Lokwani; John-Paul Denson; Simon Messing; Sam G Michael; William Gillette; Robert P Kimberly; Steven E Reis; Matthew D Hall; Dominic Esposito; Matthew J Memoli; Kaitlyn Sadtler
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-01-31

4.  Assessing the age specificity of infection fatality rates for COVID-19: systematic review, meta-analysis, and public policy implications.

Authors:  Andrew T Levin; William P Hanage; Nana Owusu-Boaitey; Kensington B Cochran; Seamus P Walsh; Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Global, regional, and national estimates of target population sizes for covid-19 vaccination: descriptive study.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Qianhui Wu; Juan Yang; Kaige Dong; Xinghui Chen; Xufang Bai; Xinhua Chen; Zhiyuan Chen; Cécile Viboud; Marco Ajelli; Hongjie Yu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-12-15

6.  Evaluating alternative hypotheses to explain the downward trend in the indices of the COVID-19 pandemic death rate.

Authors:  Sonali Shinde; Pratima Ranade; Milind Watve
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Missing science: A scoping study of COVID-19 epidemiological data in the United States.

Authors:  Rajiv Bhatia; Isabella Sledge; Stefan Baral
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Risk of infection and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among children and adolescents in households, communities and educational settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Omar Irfan; Jiang Li; Kun Tang; Zhicheng Wang; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.413

9.  SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity rate and seroprevalence of related antibodies among a sample of patients in Cairo: Pre-wave 2 results of a screening program in a university hospital.

Authors:  Samia A Girgis; Hala M Hafez; Hoda Ezz Elarab; Basma Sherif; Moshira H Sabry; Iman Afifi; Fatma Elzahraa Hassan; Amira Reda; Shaimaa Elsayed; Asmaa Mahmoud; Petra Habeb; Ihab S Habil; Rasha S Hussein; Isis M Mossad; Ossama Mansour; Ashraf Omar; Ayman M Saleh; Mahmoud El-Meteini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Population-based seroprevalence surveys of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody: An up-to-date review.

Authors:  Chih-Cheng Lai; Jui-Hsiang Wang; Po-Ren Hsueh
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.