Literature DB >> 32789255

Leftward Optical Shift Induces Bias in Line Bisection: A Study with Healthy Subjects Using a Head-mounted Display.

Taku Numao1,2, Yuri Fujita3, Kyohei Ichikawa4, Shogo Ide4, Hidekazu Katori4, Tomoko Shimada5, Kohei Ota5, Yumi Ikeda2, Kazu Amimoto2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to verify the effect on spatial perception in healthy young subjects of an unconscious leftward optical shift created by a head-mounted display (HMD) with an offset camera.
METHODS: We recruited 40 healthy right-handed adults who were divided into four groups according to the hand used in the tests and the visual direction displayed by the HMD (centered or 10° left). Each of the four groups (n = 10) undertook line bisection tasks across four combinations of variables: using a finger/stick or a mouse to point at a touch panel located 60 or 120 cm away from the subject.
RESULTS: According to the results, regardless of the hand used, when the index finger or a stick was used (reaching condition), the line bisection point was displaced significantly to the left of the center. Additionally, a major left-displacement trend was observed in the short-distance reaching task, which did not require the use of a stick. In contrast, the long-distance task required a stick to be used, and the left displacements were all smaller than those for the short-distance tasks that used the index finger.
CONCLUSION: This finding may be explained by the subjects having sufficient experience coordinating hand and eye movements in the condition where they used their dominant hand and reached with their own arms without using a stick. ©2019 The Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  head-mounted display; line bisection bias; unilateral spatial neglect

Year:  2019        PMID: 32789255      PMCID: PMC7365205          DOI: 10.2490/prm.20190008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Rehabil Med        ISSN: 2432-1354


  10 in total

1.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.

Authors:  G Jewell; M E McCourt
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  On the nature of near space: effects of tool use and the transition to far space.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Stella F Lourenco
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Y Rossetti; G Rode; L Pisella; A Farné; L Li; D Boisson; M T Perenin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones.

Authors:  A Iriki; M Tanaka; Y Iwamura
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-10-02       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Definition: Spatial neglect.

Authors:  Roberto Cubelli
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Normative data for distal line bisection and baking tray task.

Authors:  Alessio Facchin; Nicoletta Beschin; Alessia Pisano; Cristina Reverberi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  N Katz; A Hartman-Maeir; H Ring; N Soroker
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 8.  Sensory Plasticity in Human Motor Learning.

Authors:  David J Ostry; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study.

Authors:  G Denes; C Semenza; E Stoppa; A Lis
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Weight and see: Line bisection in neglect reliably measures the allocation of attention, but not the perception of length.

Authors:  Robert D McIntosh; Magdalena Ietswaart; A David Milner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.139

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.