| Literature DB >> 32784372 |
Nicolas W Clark1,2, Chad H Herring1,2, Erica R Goldstein1,2, Jeffrey R Stout1,2, Adam J Wells2,3, David H Fukuda1,2.
Abstract
This study examined the cardiac autonomic responses, as measured by heart rate variability (HRV), during cycling exercise and short-term rest after energy drink consumption. Seventeen participants (seven males and 10 females; age: 22.8 ± 3.5 years; BMI: 24.3 ± 3.3 kg/m2) completed this double-blind, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced crossover design study. Participants received an energy drink formula containing 140 mg of caffeine and a placebo in a randomized order before completing a 10-min steady-state warm up (WUP) and a graded exercise test to exhaustion (GXT) followed by a 15-min short-term rest (STR) period. Heartbeat intervals were recorded using a heart rate monitor. Data were divided into WUP, GXT, and STR phases, and HRV parameters were averaged within each phase. Additionally, root mean square of the standard deviation of R-R intervals (RMSSD) during GXT was analyzed to determine the HRV threshold. Separate two-way (sex (male vs. female) x drink (energy drink vs. placebo)) repeated measures ANOVA were utilized. Significant increases in high frequency (HF) and RMSSD were shown during WUP after energy drink consumption, while interactions between drink and sex were observed for HRV threshold parameters (initial RMSSD and rate of RMSSD decline). No significant differences were noted during STR. Energy drink consumption may influence cardiac autonomic responses during low-intensity exercise, and sex-based differences in response to graded exercise to exhaustion may exist.Entities:
Keywords: autonomic nervous system; caffeine; energy drink; heart rate variability threshold; sex-differences; thermogenic drink formula; vagal withdrawal
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32784372 PMCID: PMC7468719 DOI: 10.3390/nu12082372
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Example of a pairwise bilinear fitting function used to evaluate the heart rate variability threshold (HRVT). This analysis consists of two linear segments (solid red lines; R-squared = 0.98) used to perform a fit of the root mean square of the standard deviation of R–R intervals (RMSSD) moving average data (black marks) to calculate the intersection location for two linear segments from the fitting result.
Comparison of frequency domain parameters during warm up, graded exercise test, and short-term recovery 15 min post exercise.
|
| Energy Drink (ED) | Placebo (PL) | Within Drink | Between Sex | Interaction Drink x Sex | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| LnHF | 14 | 5.65 ± 0.17 | 4.95 ± 0.17 | <0.001 * | 0.799 | 0.781 |
| HF% | 14 | 41 ± 3 | 39 ± 3 | 0.592 | 0.111 | 0.655 | |
| LnLF | 15 | 5.91 ± 0.18 | 5.42 ± 0.18 | <0.001 * | 0.630 | 0.688 | |
| LF% | 15 | 52 ± 33 | 54 ± 3 | 0.584 | 0.049 * | 0.832 | |
| LF/HF | 13 | 0.24 ± 0.19 | 0.37 ± 0.19 | 0.342 | 0.116 | 0.950 | |
| LnTP | 14 | 6.60 ± 0.17 | 6.08 ± 0.17 | <0.001 * | 0.238 | 0.229 | |
|
| LnHF | 15 | 2.55 ± 0.23 | 2.56 ± 0.23 | 0.937 | 0.149 | 0.038 * |
| HF% | 15 | 37 ± 3 | 35 ± 3 | 0.261 | 0.271 | 0.022 * | |
| LnLF | 15 | 2.97 ± 0.19 | 3.05 ± 0.19 | 0.691 | 0.010 * | 0.258 | |
| LF% | 13 | 52 ± 3 | 52 ± 3 | 0.904 | 0.154 | 0.364 | |
| LF/HF | 15 | 0.42 ± 0.14 | 0.48 ± 0.14 | 0.532 | 0.252 | 0.049 * | |
| LnTP | 14 | 3.55 ± 0.18 | 3.55 ± 0.18 | 0.998 | 0.069 | 0.208 | |
|
| LnHF | 15 | 3.06 ± 0.34 | 3 ± 0.34 | 0.058 | 0.834 | 0.885 |
| HF% | 12 | 14 ± 3 | 19 ± 3 | 0.059 | 0.086 | 0.180 | |
| LnLF | 15 | 4.59 ± 0.26 | 5.07 ± 0.26 | 0.078 | 0.442 | 0.819 | |
| LF% | 15 | 70 ± 3 | 68 ± 3 | 0.534 | 0.133 | 0.659 | |
| LF/HF | 14 | 1.51 ± 0.22 | 1.34 ± 0.22 | 0.151 | 0.218 | 0.741 | |
| LnTP | 14 | 4.94 ± 0.26 | 5.42 ± 0.26 | 0.096 | 0.725 | 0.973 |
* Significant differences (p < 0.05). HF—High Frequency; LF/HF—Low Frequency High Frequency Ratio; TP—Total Power.
Comparison of time domain parameters during warm up, graded exercise test, and short-term recovery 15 min post exercise.
|
| Energy Drink (ED) | Placebo (PL) | Within Drink | Between Sex | Interaction Drink x Sex | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean RR (ms) | 15 | 598 ± 17 | 610 ± 17 | 0.207 | 0.254 | 0.894 |
| HRmean (bpm) | 15 | 99 ± 3 | 99 ± 3 | 0.910 | 0.526 | 0.189 | |
| HRmax (bpm) | 14 | 115 ± 3 | 109 ± 3 | 0.008 * | 0.630 | 0.688 | |
| HRmin (bpm) | 13 | 75 ± 3 | 71 ± 3 | 0.217 | 0.798 | 0.859 | |
| LnRMSSD | 13 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 0.006 * | 0.671 | 0.999 | |
|
| Mean RR (ms) | 15 | 397 ± 6 | 413 ± 6 | 0.005 * | 0.065 | 0.515 |
| HRmean (bpm) | 15 | 155 ± 3 | 149 ± 3 | 0.016 * | 0.111 | 0.635 | |
| HRmax (bpm) | 14 | 190 ± 2 | 184 ± 2 | 0.014 * | 0.235 | 0.708 | |
| HRmin (bpm) | 14 | 106 ± 3 | 100 ± 3 | 0.028 * | 0.645 | 0.898 | |
| LnRMSSD | 14 | 1.44 ± 0.09 | 1.39 ± 0.09 | 0.451 | 0.773 | 0.079 | |
|
| Mean RR (ms) | 13 | 509 ± 10 | 533 ± 10 | 0.023 * | 0.400 | 0.915 |
| HRmean (bpm) | 15 | 118 ± 3 | 112 ± 3 | 0.021 * | 0.566 | 0.731 | |
| HRmax (bpm) | 15 | 187 ± 3 | 180 ± 3 | 0.041 * | 0.131 | 0.377 | |
| HRmin (bpm) | 15 | 94 ± 3 | 87 ± 3 | 0.009 * | 0.854 | 0.523 | |
| LnRMSSD | 11 | 1.63 ± 0.13 | 1.91 ± 0.13 | 0.104 | 0.546 | 0.673 |
* Significant differences (p < 0.05). Mean RR—mean differences in R–R intervals; HRmean—Mean Heart Rate; HR max—Maximum Heart Rate Achieved; HRmin—Minimum Heart Rate Achieved; RMSSD—Root Mean Square of the Successive R–R intervals.
Figure 2Paired mean difference for breathing rate (R; breaths per min) during the warm-up (WUP), graded exercise test (GXT), and short-term rest post exercise (STR) are shown above in the Cumming estimation plot. The raw data are plotted on the upper axes; each paired set of energy drink (ED) and placebo (PL) is connected by a line. On the lower axes, each paired mean difference is plotted as a bootstrap sampling distribution. Mean differences are depicted as dots; 95% confidence intervals are indicated by the ends of the vertical error bars [32]; * Significant differences between drinks (p < 0.05).