| Literature DB >> 32782021 |
Ying Xiang1,2,3, Feng Wu1,2, Yinghui Chai2, Xuebin Xu4, Lang Yang1, Sai Tian2, Haoran Zhang1, Yinxia Li2, Chaojie Yang2, Hongbo Liu2, Shaofu Qiu5, Hongbin Song6, Yansong Sun7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: At present, azithromycin has become an effective treatment for severe diarrhea caused by Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) infection. However, enterobacteria have begun to develop resistance to azithromycin and have attracted attention in recent years. This study conducted to described the emergence of a high proportion of azithromycin-resistant ETEC serogroup O6 strains in Shanghai and to analyzed the mechanisms of azithromycin resistance.Entities:
Keywords: Azithromycin; Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli; Nanopore sequencing; Plasmid; Whole-genome sequencing; mphA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32782021 PMCID: PMC7418381 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-020-01927-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Antimicrobial resistance of 30 ETEC serogroup O6 strains
| Antibiotic | R [N(%)] | I [N(%)] | S [N(%)] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceftriaxone | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0.0) | 29 (96.7) |
| Tetracycline | 2 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) | 28 (93.3) |
| Ceftiofur | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0.0) | 29 (96.7) |
| Cefoxitin | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 30 (100.0) |
| Gentamicin | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 30 (100.0) |
| Ampicillin | 26 (86.7) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (13.3) |
| Chloramphenicol | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 30 (100.0) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.3) | 29 (96.7) |
| Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | 2 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) | 28 (93.3) |
| Sulfisoxazole | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 30 (100.0) |
| Nalidixic acid | 29 (96.7) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.3) |
| Streptomycin | 2 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) | 28 (93.3) |
| Azithromycin | 26 (86.7) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (13.3) |
| Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 30 (100.0) |
| Multidrug resistance | 26 (86.7) |
Fig. 1Phylogenetic tree of ETEC strains. Maximum likelihood phylogeny was estimated using RAxML (v8.2.4). The branch where the self-tested strains are located was marked in red color. a Complete phylogenetic tree of 392 strains. b The branch of the self-tested strains and its adjacent phylogenetic tree branch
Fig. 2AMR gene groups detected in each genome sequence at more than 70% coverage and 80% identity using BLAST (BLASTn). Presence and absence of AMR genes were represented by dark red and light grey colors, respectively. Presence of the gyrA (Ser83Leu), gyrA (Asn87Asx) and gyrA (Asn87Tyr) point mutations were represented by light blue, dark blue and dark green colors, respectively. Purple with different color depths represents the strain’s coverage of plasmid pQPES18024_1
Fig. 3Alignment of 2014EL-1343-unnamed3, pQPES18024_1, and p203740_80. Block arrows indicate confirmed or putative open reading frames (ORFs) and their orientations. Arrow size is proportional to predicted ORF length. Resistance genes are indicated by red arrows, insert sequences are indicated by green arrows and transposases are indicated by blue arrows