| Literature DB >> 32780185 |
Peter A Seeber1,2, Tetiana A Kuzmina3, Alex D Greenwood4,5, Marion L East6.
Abstract
In wildlife, endoparasite burden can be affected by host life history stage, environmental conditions, host abundance, and parasite co-infections. We tested the effects of these factors on gastrointestinal parasite infection in plains zebras (Equus quagga) in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania, using fecal egg counts of two nematode families (Strongylidae and Ascarididae) and the presence/absence of cestode (Anoplocephalidae) eggs. We predicted higher egg counts of Strongylidae and Ascarididae, and increased likelihood of Anoplocephalidae infection in individuals (1) during energetically costly life history stages when resource allocation to immune processes may decrease and in young zebras after weaning because of increased uptake of infective stages with forage, (2) when climatic conditions facilitate survival of infective stages, (3) when large zebra aggregations increase forage contamination with infective stages, and (4) in individuals co-infected with more than one parasite group as this may indicate reduced immune competence. Strongylidae egg counts were higher, and the occurrence of Anoplocephalidae eggs was more likely in bachelors than in band stallions, whereas Ascarididae egg counts were higher in band stallions. Strongylidae and Ascarididae egg counts were not increased in lactating females. Strongylidae egg counts were higher in subadults than in foals. Regardless of sex and age, Ascarididae infections were more likely under wet conditions. Co-infections did not affect Strongylidae egg counts. Ascarididae egg counts in adult females were higher when individuals were co-infected with Anoplocephalidae. We present evidence that parasite burdens in plains zebras are affected by life history stage, environmental conditions, and co-infection.Entities:
Keywords: Anoplocephalidae; Ascarididae; Parasite burden; Parasite prevalence; Strongylidae
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32780185 PMCID: PMC7505882 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-020-06836-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitol Res ISSN: 0932-0113 Impact factor: 2.289
Prevalence ([prev]; percent of infected individuals), mean number of eggs per gram feces (EPG), mean egg counts including non-infected individuals, and median egg counts of Strongylidae and Ascarididae and prevalence of Anoplocephalidae infections in adult males, adult females, subadults, and foals
| Strongylidae | Ascarididae | Anoplo-cephalidae | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prev | Mean EPG of infected zebras | Mean EPG including non-infected zebras | Median EPG | Prev | Mean EPG of infected zebras | Mean EPG including non-infected zebras | Median EPG | Prev | |
| Adult males ( | 100% | 1341 | 1341 | 1100 | 33% | 168 | 55 | 0 | 24% |
| Adult females ( | 98% | 1172 | 1153 | 1175 | 30% | 138 | 41 | 0 | 12% |
| Subadults ( | 100% | 1987 | 1987 | 1838 | 34% | 314 | 109 | 0 | 23% |
| Foals ( | 88% | 971 | 850 | 512 | 25% | 175 | 44 | 0 | 13% |
Results of generalized linear models on Strongylidae egg counts to test effects of climatic condition, reproductive state (in adults), age class (in young), and co-infection with Ascarididae or Anoplocephalidae in adult males, females, and young plains zebras
| Predictor | Direction of the effect | Est. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult males | ||||
| Intercept | 7.49 | 53.57 | < 0.001 | |
| Climatic condition | Dry → wet | − 0.13 | − 0.85 | 0.393 |
| Reproductive state | Bachelor → band stallion | |||
| Aggregation size | Small → large | 0.14 | − 1.01 | 0.317 |
| Co-infection with Ascarididae | Non-infected → infected | − 0.05 | − 0.37 | 0.713 |
| Co-infection with Anoplocephalidae | Non-infected → infected | − 0.03 | − 0.17 | 0.862 |
| Adult females | ||||
| Intercept | 7.09 | 43.55 | < 0.001 | |
| Climatic condition | Dry → wet | − 0.10 | − 0.65 | 0.519 |
| Reproductive state | Non-lactating → lactating | − 0.09 | − 0.62 | 0.538 |
| Aggregation size | Small → large | > 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.996 |
| Co-infection with Ascarididae | Non-infected → infected | 0.20 | 1.34 | 0.180 |
| Co-infection with Anoplocephalidae | Non-infected → infected | − 0.14 | − 0.69 | 0.490 |
| Young | ||||
| Intercept | 7.51 | 25.67 | < 0.001 | |
| Climatic condition | Dry → wet | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.952 |
| Age class | Foal → subadult | |||
| Aggregation size | Small → large | 0.08 | 0.25 | 0.805 |
| Co-infection with Ascarididae | Non-infected → infected | 0.61 | 1.07 | 0.088 |
| Co-infection with Anoplocephalidae | Non-infected → infected | − 0.18 | − 0.46 | 0.643 |
Significant effects in italics; arrows indicate the direction of the respective effect:; est. estimate
Fig. 2Strongylidae egg counts (EPG; [log+1]-transformed) in adult male, adult female, and young zebras at different life history stages (adult males: bachelors [bac.] and band stallions [band st.]; adult females: lactating [lact.] and non-lactating [other]; young: subadults and foals) and under different climatic conditions (dry vs. wet). Boxes indicate first and third quartiles; center lines indicate median values; whiskers extend to the highest (and lowest) value within 1.5 times the inter-quartile range. Data points beyond the end of the whiskers are plotted as open dots. Filled squares indicate the mean predicted effect of the respective predictor according to the zero-inflated count models
Results of models on presence/absence of Anoplocephalidae eggs to test effects of climatic condition, reproductive state (in adults), age class (in young), and co-infection with Ascarididae in adult males, females, and young plains zebras
| Predictor | Direction of the effect | Est. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult males | ||||
| Intercept | 1.20 | 11.99 | < 0.001 | |
| Climatic condition | Dry → wet | |||
| Reproductive state | Bachelor → band stallion | |||
| Aggregation size | Small → large | − 0.12 | − 1.26 | 0.207 |
| Co-infection with Ascarididae | Non-infected → infected | − 0.01 | − 0.10 | 0.917 |
| Adult females | ||||
| Intercept | 1.07 | 14.30 | < 0.001 | |
| Climatic condition | Dry → wet | 0.03 | 0.36 | 0.721 |
| Reproductive state | Non-lactating → lactating | − 0.01 | − 0.29 | 0.772 |
| Aggregation size | Small → large | 0.05 | 0.84 | 0.400 |
| Co-infection with Ascarididae | Non-infected → infected | |||
| Young | ||||
| Intercept | 1.27 | 11.81 | < 0.001 | |
| Climatic condition | Dry → wet | − 0.13 | − 0.83 | 0.409 |
| Age class | Foal → subadult | 0.06 | 0.50 | 0.619 |
| Aggregation size | Small → large | 0.17 | 1.40 | 0.162 |
| Co-infection with Ascarididae | Non-infected → infected | 0.22 | 1.61 | 0.107 |
Significant effects in italics; arrows indicate the direction of the respective effect: est. estimate
Fig. 3Percentage of adult male, adult female, and young zebras infected (gray) and not infected with Anoplocephalidae (white) at different life history stages (adult males: bachelors [bac.] and band stallions [band st.]; adult females: lactating [lact] and non-lactating [other]; young: subadults and foals) and under different climatic conditions (dry vs. wet)
Results of zero-inflated negative binomial models (binary model [indicating the probability of the variable being zero] and count model output) on Ascarididae egg counts to test effects of climatic condition, reproductive state (in adults), age class (in young), and Anoplocephalidae co-infection in adult males, females, and young plains zebras
| Direction of effect | Binary model | Count model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est. | Est. | ||||||
| Adult males | |||||||
| Intercept | 2.11 | 2.92 | 0.004 | 5.41 | 14.68 | < 0.001 | |
| Climatic condition | Dry → wet | − 0.56 | − 1.68 | 0.094 | |||
| Reproductive state | Bachelor → band stallion | − 0.16 | − 0.32 | 0.751 | |||
| Aggregation size | Small → large | 0.88 | 1.26 | 0.207 | 0.65 | 1.90 | 0.057 |
| Co-infection with Anoplocephalidae | Non-infected → infected | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.975 | − 0.29 | − 0.98 | 0.326 |
| Adult females | |||||||
| Intercept | 2.24 | 3.38 | < 0.001 | 4.65 | 9.77 | < 0.001 | |
| Climatic condition | Dry → wet | − 0.13 | − 0.39 | 0.700 | |||
| Reproductive state | Non-lactating → lactating | 0.18 | 0.38 | 0.706 | − 0.21 | − 0.66 | 0.509 |
| Aggregation size | Small → large | 0.66 | 1.33 | 0.185 | − 0.01 | − 0.04 | 0.968 |
| Co-infection with Anoplocephalidae | Non-infected → infected | ||||||
| Young | |||||||
| Intercept | 2.50 | 2.60 | 0.009 | 6.44 | 12.21 | < 0.001 | |
| Climatic condition | Dry → wet | 0.21 | 0.50 | 0.617 | |||
| Age class | Foal → subadult | − 0.67 | − 0.81 | 0.416 | 0.62 | 1.57 | 0.117 |
| Aggregation size | Small → large | 1.58 | 1.66 | 0.097 | |||
| Co-infection with Anoplocephalidae | Non-infected → infected | − 1.45 | − 1.51 | 0.131 | |||
Significant effects in italics; arrows indicate the direction of the respective effect est. estimate
Fig. 1Ascarididae egg counts (EPG; [log+1]-transformed) in adult male, adult female, and young zebras at different life history stages (adult males: bachelors [bac.] and band stallions [band st.]; adult females: lactating [lact.] and non-lactating [other]; young: subadults and foals) and under different climatic conditions (dry vs. wet). Boxes indicate first and third quartiles; center lines indicate median values; whiskers extend to the highest (and lowest) value within 1.5 times the inter-quartile range. Data points beyond the end of the whiskers are plotted as open dots. Filled squares indicate the mean predicted effect of the respective predictor according to the zero-inflated count models