Davod Ilbeigi1, Mitra Nourbakhsh2,3, Parvin Pasalar4,3, Reza Meshkani1, Hajar Shokri Afra1, G Hodratollah Panahi1, Mohammad Borji5, Roya Sharifi6. 1. Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Electronic Address: nourbakhsh.m@iums.ac.ir. 3. Metabolic Disorders Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular, Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 4. Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Electronic Address: pasalar@sina.tums.ac.ir. 5. Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 6. Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Allied Medical sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
It is believed that non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
(NAFLD) ranks among the most common liver disorders
worldwide and shows increasing incidence within the
past two decades (1). NAFLD ranges from simple fat
deposition (steatosis) to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
(NASH), characterized by steatosis and inflammation.
NASH can lead to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and eventually
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (2).Liver has a central role in lipid metabolism, and synthesis, and import of free fatty
acids, as well as storing and exporting lipids and lipoproteins. In NAFLD, lipid deposition
is increased because of elevated hepatic lipogenesis and increased lipid uptake. At the same
time, reduced lipid removal caused by decreased β-oxidation and diminished TG export, causes
a positive lipid balance in the liver leading to the progression of NAFLD (3). Obesity and
its metabolic consequences such as insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus, are the
most prevalent risk factors for dyslipidemia and steatosis development (4).Approximately 26% of liver lipids are produced by de
novo lipogenesis and this pathway is induced in individuals
with NAFLD (5). In this pathway, acetyl-CoA carboxylase
(ACC) and fatty acid synthase (FAS) are major enzymes
that are controlled by important transcription factors like
carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP),
sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c)
and liver X receptor (LXR) (6).Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT),
an enzyme with two intra- and extracellular forms, is a
52 kDa protein expressed in approximately all tissues/
cells (7). Extracellular NAMPT (eNAMPT), generally
called visfatin, is secreted by visceral adipose tissue
and functions as an adipokine and activates various cellular
signaling pathways (8, 9). Intracellular form of the protein
(iNAMPT) has an enzymatic activity and functions as the key enzyme in NAD biosynthesis. NAD is an essential coenzyme
in many metabolic reactions and has multiple roles in
cellular metabolism (10). NAMPT catalyzes the synthesis of
nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) from nicotinamide and
5-phosphoribosyl-pyrophosphate (PRPP) (11). Nicotinamide
mononucleotide adenylyltransferase (NMNAT) turns NMN
into NAD (12). Some enzymes use NAD as substrate for
their catalytic reactions such as the sirtuin family of protein
deacetylases (13); one of them is silent information regulator
1 (SIRT1) and its inhibition has been shown to be implicated
in hepatic steatosis (14). SIRT1 controls the function of AMPactivated
protein kinase (AMPK), which is a central enzyme
in energy homeostasis and fatty acid metabolism (15, 16).
ACC phosphorylation and activity are respectively increased
and repressed by AMPK phosphorylation. The subsequent
decline in the synthesis of malonyl-CoA causes up-regulation
of fatty acid oxidation and suppression of fatty acid synthesis,
which lead to decreased levels of hepatocyte lipids (17).
Moreover, glucose-induced expression of FAS is impeded by
AMPK activation that hampers fatty acid biosynthesis and
leads to decreased TG levels (18).SREBP-1c is one of the main transcription factors that induces the expressions of lipogenic
genes such as FAS, ACC and glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase
(GPAT), and can affect the production of fatty acids and TG. Thus, SREBP-
1c plays a critical role in NAFLD (19). It was found that AMPK can phosphorylate SREBP-1c at
Ser 372, suppress its translocation into the nucleus, and therefore repress the expression
of its target genes (20). Increased expression of SIRT1 was shown to be a causative factor
in SREBP-1c gene expression decline in obese mice (21).Recent studies suggested that NAMPT is involved in lipid metabolism in the liver; however,
its mechanism is still not clearly defined (19, 22). A recent study showed that inhibition
of NAMPT by its chemical inhibitor, FK866, aggravated hepatic lipid accumulation and
steatosis in vivo and in vitro (19). Additionally, it was
reported that NAMPT is necessary for de novo lipid biosynthesis in prostate
cancer (PCa) cells (22). NAMPT expression was also shown to be reduced in the serum and
liver tissue of patients with NAFLD (23).Given the regulatory role of SIRT1 and AMPK in fatty acid
and lipid metabolism, NAMPT might be related to NAFLD
by provision of NAD as the main SIRT1 substrate.Some studies showed that circulating levels of
eNAMPT/visfatin are elevated in NAFLD (24, 25).
Conversely, downregulation of iNAMPT was recently
reported in hepatic tissue of patients with NAFLD (23).
Taken together, these studies point to the involvement
of NAMPT in the pathogenesis of NAFLD; however,
the associated molecular and metabolic mechanisms are
not fully elucidated. In the current study, we inspected
the effect of NAMPT knockdown on lipid accumulation,
lipogenic factors, and SIRT1 activity in HepG2 cells.
Materials and Methods
This experimental study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR.
TUMS.REC1394.2182).
Cell culture and transfection
Human hepatoma cells (HepG2) were obtained and authenticated from Iranian Biological
Resource Center (Tehran, Iran). All cell culture reagents were bought from Gibco (UK).
HepG2 cells were kept at 37˚C in Dulbecco Modified Eagle medium (DMEM) containing fetal
bovine serum (10%) and 100 μg/ml penicillin and streptomycin, in 5% CO2. Cells
were transfected using polyethyleneimine (PEI, Thermo, USA) as transfection reagent.
Approximately, 5×105 cells were seeded in 2 ml of medium in 6-well plates for
24 hours, prior to transfection. Afterwards, the cells were incubated with serum-free
medium for 6 hours and subsequently transfected with PEI alone (mock) or with either siRNA
against NAMPT or its negative control (scrambled siRNA) from GenePharma (Shanghai, China).
FAM-labeled control siRNA (GenePharma, Shanghai, China) was also used to monitor
transfection efficiency. The siRNA was mixed with PEI at the nitrogen/phosphate (N/P)
ratio of six (26). Cells were incubated with the transfection complex for 24 hours.
Afterwards, the transfection medium was substituted with fresh growth medium and the
incubation was continued for another 24 hours. Cells with no treatment were considered
control. Knockdown of NAMPT was confirmed by realtime polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and
western blotting. Resveratrol was also used to investigate the involvement of SIRT1. For
this purpose, two different concentrations of resveratrol (20 and 50 μM) were examined
according to the cytotoxicity test done by MTT (27, 28); eventually, because of better
cell viability, 20 μM concentration was chosen for the experiments. The transfected cells
were treated with resveratrol (20 μM) or NAD (1 mM) separately in fresh medium for 24
hours.
Detection of SIRT1 deacetylase activity
To investigate the relationship between NAMPT
knockdown and changes in SIRT1 activity, the effect of
NAMPT knockdown by siRNA on SIRT1 deacetylase
activity was assessed after transfection for 48 hours using
an SIRT1 Activity Assay Kit (Fluorometric, Abcam,
Cambridge, UK) following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Briefly, a mixture including fluoro-substrate peptides and
NAD as SIRT1 substrates was mixed with cell extracts or
recombinant SIRT1 as the positive control.Then, a microplate reader was used to measure
fluorescence for 60 minutes with 1-2 minute intervals at
excitation and emission wavelength of 350 and 460 nm,
respectively. Fluorescence intensity relative to untreated
control cells was used to express the enzyme activity.
Oil red O staining
About 5×105 HepG2 cells were seeded in 2 ml of medium in 6-well plates for 24
hours and transfected as described above. After transfection, cells were washed 3 times
with phosphate buffered saline (PBS, Sigma Aldrich, Germany) and fixed with 4%
formaldehyde for 1 hour. Oil Red-O staining solution (0.5% in isopropanol) was added and
incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. Finally, the cells were washed 3 times with
PBS. The cells were photographed under light microscopy. Isopropanol was added to the
stained lipid droplets and the absorbance was measured at 492 nm.
Intracellular triglyceride measurement
Cells were harvested 48 hours after transfection and the intracellular TG content was
measured. Pellets of cells were homogenized in 1 ml of 5% NP-40 solution. Then, slow
heating was applied to the mixture to 80-100°C in a water bath for 5 minutes; afterward,
the mixture was let to cool down to room temperature. Then, it was centrifuged for 2
minutes at top speed for eliminating the insoluble materials. Next, a commercial kit
(Abcam, UK) was applied to determine TG content of the resulting solution. The
concentration of total protein was quantified by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method by
applying Pierce protein assay kit (Thermo, USA), and TG levels were presented as μg of
lipid/mg of protein.
Real-time polymerase chain reaction
RNA extraction kit (GeneAll, South Korea) was used for total RNA isolation. Reverse
transcription reaction was performed using kit for cDNA synthesis (Thermo Fisher
Scientific, Waltham, USA). StepOnePlus real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA) was
applied using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Ampliqon, Denmark) to amplify the resulting cDNA.
Relative gene expression was analyzed by ∆∆Ct method and β-actin was used
as the normalizer (29). The primer sequences are presented in Table 1.The sequences of the used primers
Western blot analysis
After transfection for 48 hours, cells were lysed by
radio-immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer containing
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) as the protease
inhibitor. The concentration of the extracted protein
was assessed using the BCA method. Electrophoresis
was performed on 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel to separate equal amounts of total
proteins; then, they were transferred into polyvinylidene
difluoride (PVDF) membranes. Subsequently, blocking
was carried out by incubation of membranes for 3 hours
at room temperature in tris-buffered saline containing
5% skim milk and 0.1% tween-20 (TBST). Afterward,
the membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C, with
rabbit primary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology,
USA) against NAMPT, phospho-AMPK (Thr172),
total-AMPK, phosho-ACC (Ser 79), total -ACC, and
GAPDH as the loading control at the dilution of 1:1000.
Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody
(Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA) at 1:5000
dilution, was used as the secondary antibody. The protein
bands were visualized by exposing them to X-ray film
after reaction with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL)
detection reagent. Densitometric analysis of the resulting
bands was performed by ImageJ software (v1.52, NIH). In
order to perform the blotting with different antibodies, the
membranes were stripped, re-probed and visualized after
blocking and incubating with the primary and secondary
antibodies.
Statistical analyses
Data are shown as mean ± SD of at least three separate
experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
together with Dunnett’s multiple comparison post-hoc
test was used to evaluate significant differences among
groups. GraphPad Prism software (version 5.04., USA)
was applied for statistical analysis. A P<0.05 was
considered statistically significant.
Results
Confirmation of transfection
Transfection efficiency was evaluated by FAM-siRNA
under a fluorescence microscope and the results were
indicative of efficient transfection (Fig.1A). In addition,
knockdown of NAMPT was confirmed by real-time PCR
as well as western blotting. Transfection with siRNA
significantly downregulated both the mRNA and protein
levels of NAMPT (by about 58 and 55 %, respectively),
compared to the control (P<0.001, Fig.1B, C).
Knockdown of NAMPT reduces SIRT1 activity
Since NAMPT provides the substrate for SIRT1
activity, we first tested the hypothesis that knockdown of
NAMPT modulates SIRT1 deacetylase activity. As shown
in Figure 2, when cells were transfected with siRNA,
SIRT1 deacetylation activity was significantly reduced
compared to the untreated control cells. This inhibition
was removed when excessive amounts of NAD were
provided, confirming that the reduction of SIRT1 activity
was due to the loss of NAD production by NAMPT.Resveratrol, which is a well-characterized activator of
SIRT1, also significantly reversed the effect of NAMPT
knockdown, further confirming that the reduced SIRT1
activity was due to the down-regulation of NAMPT.Transfection of HepG2 cells with NAMPT siRNA. A. Transfection efficiency was tested
by FAM-siRNA under a fluorescence microscope (right panel) compared to the image under
the optical microscope (left panel) (scale bar: 50 μm). B. Decreased
expression of NAMPT mRNA measured by real-time PCR. C. Protein levels
evaluated by western blotting compared to untreated control cells, after transfection
with siRNA (Si), and D. A representative blotting image. Transfected
cells were also treated with NAD (1 mM) and resveratrol (Res) (20 μM). A
representativeblotting image is shown and the data represent the mean ± SD. NAMPT; Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase, PCR; Polymerase chain reaction, NAD;
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, *; P<0.05, ***; P<0.001 versus the control, and NC; Negative control (scrambled siRNA).Reduced SIRT1 activity in HepG2 cells after transfection with NAMPT
siRNA (Si). Resveratrol (Res) or NAD ameliorated this effect and increased SIRT1
activity. The results are mean ± SD of at least 3 independent experiments.NAMPT; Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase, NAD; Nicotinamide adenine
dinucleotide, *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01, ***; P<0.001 versus the control, and NC;
Negative control (scrambled siRNA).
NAMPT affects hepatic lipid accumulation via SIRT1
In order to determine whether NAMPT is involved
in hepatic steatosis, Oil Red O staining was performed.
The results indicated that lipid content of HepG2 cells
was significantly increased after NAMPT knockdown
(Fig.3A, B). In addition, intracellular TG levels were
measured following knockdown of NAMPT in HepG2
cells. As it is shown in Figure 3C, NAMPT knockdown
caused a remarkable rise in the TG content of cells
compared to the control cells. Elevation of TG levels by
NAMPT knockdown was notably reversed by addition
of NAD, confirming the effect of NAMPT inhibition on
hepatic steatosis. Interestingly, treatment with resveratrol
significantly reduced the TG accumulation that indicated
the involvement of SIRT1 in the effect of NAMPT on
lipid metabolism in HepG2 cells.
NAMPT and SIRT1 cooperate in the regulation of lipid metabolism in liver cells
through modulation of FAS and SREBP-1c
To determine the participation of NAMPT in the gene expression of lipogenic factors in
hepatocytes, HepG2 cells were transfected with NAMPT siRNA and the effect of NAMPT
silencing was evaluated on FAS and SREBP-1 mRNA
expression. We showed that suppression of NAMPT was followed by a significant enhancement
of FAS and SREBP-1 expression at mRNA levels. In
comparison to the untreated control cells, we achieved 28 and 30% elevation in
SREBP-1 and FAS mRNA levels, respectively (Fig.4A, B).
The negative control siRNA had no influence on the expression of these genes. On the other
hand, treatment with resveratrol or NAD reversed these effects and significantly decreased
the SREBP-1c and FAS mRNA levels compared to the cells
transfected with NAMPT siRNA.Knockdown of NAMPT with siRNA (Si) promoted TG accumulation in HepG2 cells. A.
Microscopic images of the intracellular lipid content after Oil Red O staining (scale
bar: 50 μm). B. Relative intracellular lipid content which was measured
spectrophotometrically at 492 nm after solubilization of Oil Red O stain.
C. Intracellular TG level determined by enzymatic method. The data
represent the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. NAMPT; Nicotinamide
phosphoribosyltransferase, TG; triglyceride, NAD; Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide,
*; P<0.05, **; P<0.01, ***; P<0.001 versus the untreated control,
and NC; Negative control (scrambled siRNA).Knockdown of NAMPT with siRNA (Si) in HepG2 cells enhanced the expression of genes involved in
lipogenesis. A. mRNA levels of SREBP-1, B.
mRNA levels of FAS, after knockdown of NAMPT. The results are
mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. NAMPT; Nicotinamide
phosphoribosyltransferase, NAD; Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, *; P<0.05,
**; P<0.01 compared to untreated control, and NC; Negative control (scrambled
siRNA).
Down-regulation of NAMPT affects phosphorylation
of ACC and AMPK via SIRT1
To characterize whether NAMPT takes part in
regulating lipid metabolism in the liver, we assessed the
influence of NAMPT knockdown on AMPK and ACC
as the regulatory enzymes in lipogenesis. As shown in
Figure 5, down-regulation of NAMPT by siRNA caused
a significant decline in the phosphorylation levels of
AMPK at Thr172 and ACC at Ser 79, by 42 and 32%,
respectively, compared to the control cells, while the
total levels of both ACC and AMPK protein were not
changed. Conversely, treatment of the transfected cells
with resveratrol or NAD significantly reversed the effect
of NAMPT knockdown, suggesting the requirement of
NAD for AMPK phosphorylation and the involvement of
SIRT1 in the activation of AMPK and inhibition of ACC.Evaluation of the effect of NAMPT knockdown with siRNA (Si) on AMPK and ACC phosphorylation in
HepG2 cells by Western blotting followed by densitometric analysis of the resulting
bands. A. A representative blotting image for pAMPK and total-AMPK.
B. quantitative analysis of the ratio of pAMPKα to total-AMPKα.
C. A representative blotting image for pACC and total-ACC.
D. Quantitative analysis of the ratio of pACC to total-ACC. The levels
of protein were normalized to GAPDH. The data are presented as mean ± SD of at least 3
separate experiments. *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01, ***; P<0.001 versus
the untreated control, and NC; Negative control (scrambled siRNA).
Discussion
NAFLD which is considered to be among the most
prevalent liver disorders, is defined by the extent of lipid
accumulation in liver (30). It is believed that dysregulation
of lipid synthesis ranks among the major reasons causing
abnormal lipid accumulation in the liver (31).Recent studies established the involvement of NAMPT
in the regulation of lipid metabolism (22, 32). In this
research, we examined the effect of NAMPT knockdown
by siRNA on TG accumulation, SIRT1 activity, and
lipogenic factors in HepG2 liver cells. The current study
presents the first direct evidence that NAMPT influences
lipid metabolism in HepG2 cells and modulates TG
accumulation through SIRT1/AMPK pathway.One of the main findings of this study was that NAMPT
knockdown resulted in lipid accumulation in HepG2 cells.
Consistently, Wang et al. (19) and Zhou et al. (33) showed
that inhibition of NAMPT aggravated hepatic lipid
accumulation and steatosis. Additionally, it was reported
that NAMPT is necessary for de novo lipid biosynthesis
in cancer (22). These results together with our findings
indicate that down-regulation of NAMPT might be an
essential element contributing to the pathogenesis of
NAFLD. The decreased expression of NAMPT in the
hepatic tissue of animals kept on high fat diet as well as
its decline in HepG2 cells treated with oleic acid is also
suggestive of the role of NAMPT in controlling hepatic
lipid metabolism (19, 33). NAMPT was also shown to
be reduced in the liver tissue of patients with NAFLD,
further confirming the relationship between NAMPT and hepatic steatosis (23). NAMPT positively regulates
SIRT1 activity through the enzymatic synthesis of NAD
(19). Furthermore, SIRT1 was shown to be protective
against hepatic steatosis (15). The levels of SIRT1 are
generally reduced in patients with NAFLD (34). On
the other hand, overexpression of SIRT1 prevents high
glucose-induced lipid pile-up in HepG2 cells (15). Here
we showed that NAMPT knockdown decreased NADdependent
deacetylase activity of SIRT1, leading to
increased TG accumulation in HepG2. Supplementation
of cells with NAD compensated the deleterious effect of
NAMPT inhibition, pointing out the importance of NAD
provision by NAMPT for the function of SIRT1.Consistent with our results, it was reported that
by reestablishing SIRT1 activity and promoting the
mitochondrial effectiveness through NAD supplementation,
the fatty liver is ameliorated in mice (35, 36). Furthermore,
Zhou et al. (33) confirmed that the age-related NAD deficit
intensified vulnerability to NAFLD and contributed to dietinduced
steatohepatitis.We also showed that treatment of transfected cells with
resveratrol, a well-known and potent SIRT1 activator (37),
reversed TG accumulation, confirming the involvement of
SIRT1 in the effect of NAMPT on liver cells. Consistently,
it was reported that treatment of 3T3-L1 adipocytes with
resveratrol decreases TG accumulation and increases
SIRT1 gene and protein expression (38).Another finding of the current study was that NAMPT
influenced the phosphorylation of ACC and AMPK. The
phosphorylation and subsequent stimulation of AMPK
lead to inhibition of ACC through phosphorylation and
shift the metabolic pathways from lipogenesis to lipid
oxidation. Thus, increased TG accumulation following
NAMPT down-regulation, can be attributed to reduced
AMPK and increased ACC activities caused by the
decline in SIRT1 function.The mRNA expression of FAS and SREBP-1, as major
transcription factors in lipid metabolism, were also increased in HepG2 cells following
NAMPT knockdown, an effect that was attenuated after treatment with NAD. Therefore,
increased gene expression of SREBP-1 as well as FAS might
serve as another mechanism linking NAMPT to hepatic steatosis. In agreement with our
results, Wang et al. (19) showed that NAMPT overexpression caused a dramatic decline in
lipid content and decreased the expressions of genes that are responsible for the regulation
of lipogenesis such as SREBP-1c, and its downstream targets including FAS and ACC.We found that the effects of NAMPT on the above
lipogenic factors were reversed by resveratrol. It was
reported that SIRT1 is able to suppress the expression of
FAS via activating AMPK (15). SIRT1 also downregulates
hepatic SREBP-1c activity by deacetylation (21). Thus, it
is suggested that the modulation of FAS and SREBP-1c
by NAMPT may also occur through SIRT1.Altogether, these results suggest a protective role for
NAMPT against NAFLD. Our findings are consistent
with the previous observations that serum NAMPT had a
significant negative correlation with the hepatic de novo
lipogenesis and liver mitochondrial function (39, 40).
Conclusion
These data demonstrate that down-regulation of
NAMPT increases hepatic lipid accumulation through
modulation of SIRT1/AMPK pathway, leading to
increased expression of FAS and SREBP-1c as well as
reduced phosphorylation of ACC. Thus, NAMPT might
be considered to be central and upstream to pathogenesis
of NAFLD and regarded as a therapeutic strategy for this
disorder.
Authors: Vera Francisco; Maria Jesus Sanz; José T Real; Patrice Marques; Maurizio Capuozzo; Djedjiga Ait Eldjoudi; Oreste Gualillo Journal: Biology (Basel) Date: 2022-08-19