Andreas Flury1, Julian Hasler2, Geert Pagenstert3, Dimitris Dimitriou2, Naeder Helmy2, Michael Finsterwald2. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Buergerspital Solothurn, Schoengruenstrasse 38, 4500, Solothurn, Switzerland. andreasflury@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Buergerspital Solothurn, Schoengruenstrasse 38, 4500, Solothurn, Switzerland. 3. Clarahof, Praxisgemeinschaft Orthopädie, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures versus stem revision (SR) surgery. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2018, 39 patients were treated with SR and 31 with ORIF for a Vancouver type B2. Mean follow-up was 40.4 months for the ORIF group and 43.5 months for the SR group. 22 of 31 stems in the ORIF group were uncemented, of which 7 (23%) were short stems. Perioperative complications, intraoperative blood loss, revision rate, and mortality were recorded. Functional outcomes included Harris Hip Score, Parker Mobility Score and hip abductor strength. RESULTS: Both groups did not differ in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, age, and sex. Compared to SR, patients treated with ORIF had a decreased blood loss, transfusion rate, operation duration, and mortality. Total complication and re-operation rates were similar. The relative risk for complication and re-operation was 0.5 and 0.7, respectively, in favour of ORIF. CONCLUSIONS: ORIF might be a valuable alternative to SR in the treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures with shorter operation duration, lower blood loss and similar complication rate compared to SR. Moreover, re-stabilization seems possible irrespective of stem's design or fixation technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures versus stem revision (SR) surgery. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2018, 39 patients were treated with SR and 31 with ORIF for a Vancouver type B2. Mean follow-up was 40.4 months for the ORIF group and 43.5 months for the SR group. 22 of 31 stems in the ORIF group were uncemented, of which 7 (23%) were short stems. Perioperative complications, intraoperative blood loss, revision rate, and mortality were recorded. Functional outcomes included Harris Hip Score, Parker Mobility Score and hip abductor strength. RESULTS: Both groups did not differ in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, age, and sex. Compared to SR, patients treated with ORIF had a decreased blood loss, transfusion rate, operation duration, and mortality. Total complication and re-operation rates were similar. The relative risk for complication and re-operation was 0.5 and 0.7, respectively, in favour of ORIF. CONCLUSIONS: ORIF might be a valuable alternative to SR in the treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures with shorter operation duration, lower blood loss and similar complication rate compared to SR. Moreover, re-stabilization seems possible irrespective of stem's design or fixation technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Entities:
Keywords:
ORIF; Periprosthetic fractures; Stem revision; Vancouver B2
Authors: Karl Stoffel; Michael Blauth; Alexander Joeris; Andrea Blumenthal; Elke Rometsch Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Boris Michael Holzapfel; Kristoff Corten; Tyler Goldberg; Maximilian Rudert; Michael Nogler; Joseph Moskal; Martin Thaler Journal: Oper Orthop Traumatol Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 1.154
Authors: Antonio Klasan; James Millar; Jonathan Quayle; Bill Farrington; Peter Nicholas Misur Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: David González-Martín; José Luis Pais-Brito; Sergio González-Casamayor; Ayron Guerra-Ferraz; Jorge Ojeda-Jiménez; Mario Herrera-Pérez Journal: EFORT Open Rev Date: 2022-08-04