Literature DB >> 32172317

Union rate, complication rate, and opioid usage after Vancouver B periprosthetic femur fractures: a comparison of fracture types.

Ajith Malige1, Shawn Yeazell2, Matthew Beck3, Franzes Anne Liongson4, Henry Boateng5, Chinenye Nwachuku2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic femur fractures are complex injuries that can be difficult to treat and recover from. With a growing number of total hip arthroplasties (THA) and revision arthroplasties being performed in an aging population, the incidence of these injuries is on the rise. Multiple studies exist detailing outcomes associated with periprosthetic femur fractures after THA, but no study has directly compared the post-operative course between fracture types as classified by the Vancouver classification system. This study compares the three Vancouver B fracture types to see if any type is associated with an increase in post-operative complications than others.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective chart review was conducted at a suburban orthopedic surgery department. Overall, 122 patients who presented to our hospital with periprosthetic proximal femur fractures after hip arthroplasty over the past 13 years were reviewed. Patients were included if they underwent surgical stabilization of their femur fracture. Patients were excluded if they underwent non-operative treatment or had missing chart information. For each patient, demographic information, fracture information, surgical information, post-operative course, and post-operative opioid usage were recorded and compared among groups.
RESULTS: Overall, 88 fractures were included. Fifty-five (62.5%) were Vancouver type B1, 27 (30.7%) were Vancouver type B2, and 6 (6.8%) were Vancouver type B3. Most of our patients were female (n = 62, 70.5%) and older than 81 years of age (n = 53, 60.2%) with uncemented prosthesis (n = 83, 94.3%). All three fracture groups had statistically similar union rates (p = 0.77), infection rates (p = 0.32), subsequent fractures (p = 0.63), repeat surgeries (p = 0.64), and post-operative opioid use (measured in milli-morphine equivalents) after surgical stabilization (p = 0.96).
CONCLUSIONS: While periprosthetic femur fractures after hip arthroplasty are associated with high complication rates and poor outcomes, there is no difference in union rate, infection rate, subsequent fractures, repeat surgery rate, and opioid usage between the different Vancouver B fracture types. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Femur; Hip; Periprosthetic; Vancouver

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32172317     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03410-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  2 in total

1.  Proximal femoral replacement for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Gregg R Klein; Javad Parvizi; Venkat Rapuri; Christopher F Wolf; William J Hozack; Peter F Sharkey; James J Purtill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Fractures of the femur after hip replacement.

Authors:  C P Duncan; B A Masri
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1995
  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Open reduction and internal fixation might be a valuable alternative to stem revision in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, irrespective of the stem's design.

Authors:  Andreas Flury; Julian Hasler; Geert Pagenstert; Dimitris Dimitriou; Naeder Helmy; Michael Finsterwald
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Comparable outcomes of in-cement revision and uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture at 5 years.

Authors:  Antonio Klasan; James Millar; Jonathan Quayle; Bill Farrington; Peter Nicholas Misur
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.067

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.