Literature DB >> 3277803

Pressure support compensation for inspiratory work due to endotracheal tubes and demand continuous positive airway pressure.

J F Fiastro1, M P Habib, S F Quan.   

Abstract

We evaluated the use of pressure support to compensate for the added inspiratory work of breathing due to the resistances of endotracheal tubes and a ventilator demand-valve system for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). A mechanical model was used to simulate spontaneous breathing at five respiratory rates through 7-mm, 8-mm, and 9-mm endotracheal tubes with and without a ventilator demand CPAP circuit. Added work was measured as the integral of the product of airway pressure and volume during inspiration. Additional work was a function of the tube's size, and each 1-mm decrease in the tube's diameter resulted in a 67 to 100 percent increase in work. Adding the ventilator CPAP circuit further increased work and was responsible for 30 to 50 percent of the total work resulting from a tube and CPAP circuit together. Pressure support was added to a level at which net work on the airway was zero, and a relationship between mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI) and the optimal level of pressure support was established for each endotracheal tube. The inspiratory work of breathing was then measured in normal subjects breathing with and without each endotracheal tube plus the demand CPAP circuit. Work per liter of minute ventilation due to the endotracheal tube and CPAP circuit was increased from 54 to 240 percent over levels measured while breathing through an open airway. For each endotracheal tube and VT/TI, a level of pressure support (range, 2 to 20 cm H2O) was found which eliminated added work in the spontaneously breathing subject. This level correlated well with that predicted from the data derived using the mechanical model. We conclude that when adjusting for an endotracheal tube's diameter and VT/TI, pressure support can be used to compensate for the added inspiratory work due to artificial airway resistances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3277803     DOI: 10.1378/chest.93.3.499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  24 in total

Review 1.  Continuous distending pressure.

Authors:  C Morley
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Ventilator Y-piece pressure compared with intratracheal airway pressure in healthy intubated children.

Authors:  Omer Nasiroglu; Bruce Craig Weldon; Lawrence S Berman; Ikram Ul Haque
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Inspiratory work imposed by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines: the effect of CPAP level and endotracheal tube size.

Authors:  J L Moran; S Homan; M O'Fathartaigh; M Jackson; P Leppard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Respiratory comfort of automatic tube compensation and inspiratory pressure support in conscious humans.

Authors:  J Guttmann; H Bernhard; G Mols; A Benzing; P Hofmann; C Haberthür; D Zappe; B Fabry; K Geiger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Effect of pressure support ventilation on breathing patterns and respiratory work.

Authors:  H Tokioka; S Saito; F Kosaka
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Inspiratory pressure support: does it make a clinical difference?

Authors:  R M Kacmarek
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Comparison of the effects of two humidifier systems on endotracheal tube resistance.

Authors:  Indalecio Morán; Belén Cabello; Elizabeth Manero; Jordi Mancebo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  P0.1 is a useful parameter in setting the level of pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  A Alberti; F Gallo; A Fongaro; S Valenti; A Rossi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Re-engineering ventilatory support to decrease days and improve resource utilization.

Authors:  O C Kirton; C B DeHaven; J Hudson-Civetta; J P Morgan; J Windsor; J M Civetta
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Work of breathing, inspiratory flow response, and expiratory resistance during continuous positive airway pressure with the ventilators EVITA-2, EVITA-4 and SV 300.

Authors:  E Calzia; K H Lindner; W Stahl; A Martin; P Radermacher; M Georgieff
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.