Literature DB >> 32775783

Continuing Medical Student Education During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: Development of a Virtual Radiation Oncology Clerkship.

Erqi L Pollom1, Navjot Sandhu1, Jessica Frank1, Jacob A Miller1, Jean-Pierre Obeid1, Noah Kastelowitz1, Neil Panjwani1, Scott G Soltys1, Hilary P Bagshaw1, Sarah S Donaldson1, Kathleen Horst1, Beth M Beadle1, Daniel T Chang1, Iris Gibbs1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our institution cancelled all in-person clerkships owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. In response, we designed a virtual radiation oncology medical student clerkship. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We convened an advisory panel to design a virtual clerkship curriculum. We implemented clerkship activities using a cloud-based learning management system, video web conferencing systems, and a telemedicine portal. Students completed assessments pre- and postclerkship to provide data to improve future versions of the clerkship.
RESULTS: The virtual clerkship spans 2 weeks and is graded pass or fail. Students attend interactive didactic sessions during the first week and participate in virtual clinic and give talks to the department during the second week. Didactic sessions include lectures, case-based discussions, treatment planning seminars, and material adapted from the Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group curriculum. Students also attend virtual departmental quality assurance rounds, cancer center seminars, and multidisciplinary tumor boards. The enrollment cap was met during the first virtual clerkship period (April 27 through May 8, 2020), with a total of 12 students enrolling.
CONCLUSIONS: Our virtual clerkship can increase student exposure and engagement in radiation oncology. Data on clerkship outcomes are forthcoming.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32775783      PMCID: PMC7237939          DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 2452-1094


Introduction

On March 15, 2020, Stanford School of Medicine, with the guidance from the Association of American Medical Colleges, suspended all on-site clinical clerkships because of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. To provide alternative clinical learning opportunities, we created a virtual radiation oncology clerkship for Stanford medical students. We aimed to fulfill the learning objectives of an in-person rotation in our department by leveraging a broad array of e-learning tools. We report here our experience with designing and implementing this virtual clerkship.

Methods and Materials

We convened an advisory panel of key stakeholders, including the medical student clerkship director (Stanford), the residency program leadership (Stanford), the associate dean of medical school admissions (Stanford), the medical student clerkship coordinator (Stanford), and other faculty and residents interested in medical education (remaining authors). The panel met weekly during the design phase to create course objectives and curriculum. Canvas (www.instructure.com), Stanford’s primary cloud-based learning management system, hosts the clerkship and provides the integrated calendaring and syllabus system, communication stream, built-in web conferencing functionality, and assignment modules. Synchronous didactic sessions, chart rounds, and tumor boards are held using Zoom or WebEx, commercially available video web conferencing systems. Virtual clinic visits are facilitated via a secure cloud-based telemedicine portal using Epic Systems, which allows remote multiparty connections. The panel continues to meet weekly during the implementation phase of the clerkship to troubleshoot issues that arise. In addition, students are required to submit anonymized pre- and postclerkship assessments to provide data to improve future versions of this clerkship.

Results

Students attend didactic sessions led by faculty, residents, and dosimetrists during the first week of the clerkship. During the second week, students participate in virtual clinics and give talks to the department (Table 1 and Fig 1).
Table 1

Sample student schedule for 2-week radiation oncology clerkship

MondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFriday
Week 1: Lecture block8:00-8:30 AM Orientation to the clerkship (FAC)8:30-9:00 AMHistory of radiation oncology (FAC)9:00-10:00 AMIntroduction to radiation oncology (RES)1:00-2:00 PMIntroduction to radiation physics(RES)8:00-9:00 AM Cancer center seminar or pediatric tumor board10:00-11:00 AMIntroduction to radiation for breast cancer (FAC)11:00 AM to 12:00 PMRadiation treatment planning(FAC and dosimetrist)2:00-3:00 PM Thoracic tumor board7:30-10:30 AMResident education10:30-11:30 AMApproach to clinic notes (FAC)1:00-2:00 PMVirtual department tour (RES)3:30-5:00 PMGI tumor board7:30-8:30 AMChart rounds1:00-2:00 AMBasics of prostate cancer/brachytherapy (FAC)4:30-6:00 PMHead and neck tumor board8:00-9:00 AMResident education9:00-10:00 AMHead and neck cancer and treatment planning (FAC)10:30-11:30 AMCyberKnife treatment planning (FAC)1:00-2:00 PMCNS tumor board
Week 2:Virtual clinic and student talksVirtual clinic§8:00-9:00 AMLymphoma tumor boardVirtual clinic§8:00-9:00 AM Cancer center seminar or pediatric tumor board2:00-3:00 PM Thoracic tumor boardVirtual clinic§7:30-10:30 AMResident education3:30-5:00 PMGI tumor boardVirtual clinic§7:30-8:30 AMChart rounds8:30-9:30 AMJournal club student talks4:30-6:00 PMHead and neck tumor boardVirtual clinic§8:00-9:00 AMResident education8:30-9:30 AMJournal club student talks1:00-2:00 PMCNS tumor board

Abbreviations: CNS = central nervous system; FAC = faculty-led; GI = gastrointestinal; RES = resident-led.

Weekly seminar on an oncology topic given by faculty speakers from various departments in the cancer center.

Scheduled didactics for residents; these are lectures on various disease-sites and radiation topics led either by faculty or residents.

Chart rounds are weekly department quality assurance sessions where new patients’ radiation treatment plans are reviewed.

Virtual clinic hours and days varied based on assigned faculty’s clinical schedule.

Figure 1

Front-end student view of virtual clerkship schedule on the Canvas web application. Students can directly access Zoom lectures and assignments using this interface.

Sample student schedule for 2-week radiation oncology clerkship Abbreviations: CNS = central nervous system; FAC = faculty-led; GI = gastrointestinal; RES = resident-led. Weekly seminar on an oncology topic given by faculty speakers from various departments in the cancer center. Scheduled didactics for residents; these are lectures on various disease-sites and radiation topics led either by faculty or residents. Chart rounds are weekly department quality assurance sessions where new patients’ radiation treatment plans are reviewed. Virtual clinic hours and days varied based on assigned faculty’s clinical schedule. Front-end student view of virtual clerkship schedule on the Canvas web application. Students can directly access Zoom lectures and assignments using this interface. Didactic sessions include lectures, case-based discussions, treatment planning sessions in Eclipse and Precision, and lectures adapted from the Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group curriculum material. Faculty and resident speakers are encouraged to integrate Zoom features such as polling (Fig 2) and chat into their sessions to engage students. A resident moderator cohosts every session to help answer chat questions while the primary speaker leads the session. The sessions are password protected, require attendee registration to track attendance, and are recorded so that students can review the material later. In addition, medical students attend departmental quality assurance rounds, cancer center seminars, and multidisciplinary tumor boards that do not conflict with clerkship activities, which are all currently offered in a virtual environment.
Figure 2

Poll feature on the Zoom platform allows students to answer questions in real-time during synchronous didactic sessions.

Poll feature on the Zoom platform allows students to answer questions in real-time during synchronous didactic sessions. For the virtual clinic experience, students are assigned to different services in teams of 2. Students work with the resident and faculty of their assigned service to see and present virtual clinic patients during the second week of the clerkship. At the end of the clerkship, students give a virtual journal club talk to the department on a recently published oncology paper. Table 2 shows course objectives and requirements. The clerkship is graded on a pass or fail basis.
Table 2

Course objectives and requirements

Course objectives

Introduce students to the field of radiation oncology and the history of Stanford radiation oncology

Educate students on basic principles of radiobiology, medical physics, and general oncology along with multidisciplinary cancer management

Participate in the assessment of cancer patients and basic radiation treatment planning

Course requirements

Complete pre- and postcourse self-assessments

Attend didactic sessions and complete postlecture assessments

Participate in virtual clinic and submit completed consult notes

Give a journal club talk to the department

Course objectives and requirements Introduce students to the field of radiation oncology and the history of Stanford radiation oncology Educate students on basic principles of radiobiology, medical physics, and general oncology along with multidisciplinary cancer management Participate in the assessment of cancer patients and basic radiation treatment planning Complete pre- and postcourse self-assessments Attend didactic sessions and complete postlecture assessments Participate in virtual clinic and submit completed consult notes Give a journal club talk to the department The enrollment cap was met during the first virtual clerkship period (April 27 through May 8, 2020), with a total of 12 students enrolling. Table 3 shows demographics and preclerkship self-assessment responses of the first cohort. Over half of the cohort (58%) was female. Only 1 student had prior exposure to radiation oncology.
Table 3

Preclerkship assessment responses of first virtual clerkship student cohort (total n = 12)

No. (%)
Age, median (range)27 (23-31)
Sex
 Female7 (58.3%)
 Male5 (41.7%)
Race
 Asian4 (33.3%)
 Caucasian6 (50.1%)
 Black or African American1 (8.3%)
 Latino, or of Spanish origin1 (8.3%)
Clinical experience
 First clinical year12 (100%)
 Second clinical year-
Degree track
 MD8 (66.7%)
 MD/PhD3 (25%)
 Other1 (8.3%)
First radiation oncology rotation12 (100%)
Had prior exposure to radiation oncology1 (8.3%)
Current interest in radiation oncology
 Not interested at all1 (8.3%)
 Would consider oncology but not necessarily radiation oncology3 (25%)
 Considering learning more about radiation oncology8 (66.7%)
 Considering applying to radiation oncology residency-
 Likely to apply to radiation oncology residency-
Understands daily responsibilities of a radiation oncologist
 Strongly disagree3 (25%)
 Disagree8 (66.7%)
 Neutral1 (8.3%)
 Agree-
 Strongly agree-
Motivations for enrolling in virtual clerkship
 Interest in radiation oncology7 (58.3%)
 Interest in learning with new technologies7 (58.3%)
 COVID-19 restrictions12 (100%)

Abbreviation: COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019.

Preclerkship assessment responses of first virtual clerkship student cohort (total n = 12) Abbreviation: COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019.

Discussion

We radically restructured our medical student clerkship program owing to the COVID-19 pandemic. To allow medical students to maximize their educational opportunities during these uncertain times, we created a virtual radiation oncology clerkship. Medical students receive little exposure to radiation therapy although it is a key component of multidisciplinary cancer care. Of the approximately 90 medical students per graduating class at Stanford, only 4 Stanford medical students have rotated through our department from July 2018 to March 2020. Our virtual clerkship generated much more interest, with the enrollment cap met almost immediately after the course was offered. Given the paucity of competing in-person clerkships and limited choices, students taking our clerkship may not have the same level of interest in radiation oncology as prior rotating students who selected our clerkship. However, 67% of the cohort did express interest in “learning more about radiation oncology,” with 92% having had no prior exposure to radiation oncology. Further, over half were women. This virtual clerkship broadened our reach, providing an important opportunity to address female trainee underrepresentation and declining overall numbers of applicants in radiation oncology., We included in our virtual clerkship educational activities that medical students have previously ranked as important and are key components of our 4-week in-person clerkship. These included structured didactics, treatment planning sessions, and the opportunity to (virtually) see and present clinic patients and give a formal talk.4, 5, 6 Because our virtual clerkship can accommodate more students than an in-person clerkship, we divided the students into smaller teams assigned to specific services to preserve the important interpersonal components of an in-person clerkship. Our virtual clerkship is currently offered through the end of June. We plan to present full results, with student and faculty feedback of the educational value of the clerkship, after several cohorts complete the clerkship. We will also examine how this clerkship ultimately affects recruitment to our specialty. Future efforts will focus on allowing students from other institutions to take the virtual clerkship. Having this option can increase access for students who may not be able to pursue an away rotation at our institution. COVID-19 has challenged us to adapt and innovate quickly in our daily work, which includes the education of our trainees. Our virtual clerkship can facilitate the integration of radiation oncology education into the medical student curriculum and increase student exposure to our field and interest in radiation oncology as a career.
  7 in total

1.  Radiation oncology fourth-year medical student clerkships: a targeted needs assessment.

Authors:  Daniel W Golden; David R Raleigh; Steven J Chmura; Matthew Koshy; Andrew R Howard
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  The High Number of Unfilled Positions in the 2019 Radiation Oncology Residency Match: Temporary Variation or Indicator of Important Change?

Authors:  James E Bates; Robert J Amdur; W Robert Lee
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-05-15

3.  Female Representation in the Academic Oncology Physician Workforce: Radiation Oncology Losing Ground to Hematology Oncology.

Authors:  Awad A Ahmed; Wei-Ting Hwang; Emma B Holliday; Christina H Chapman; Reshma Jagsi; Charles R Thomas; Curtiland Deville
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  A national radiation oncology medical student clerkship survey: didactic curricular components increase confidence in clinical competency.

Authors:  Vikrant S Jagadeesan; David R Raleigh; Matthew Koshy; Andrew R Howard; Steven J Chmura; Daniel W Golden
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  National Radiation Oncology Medical Student Clerkship Trends From 2013 to 2018.

Authors:  Lisa Ni; Steven J Chmura; Daniel W Golden
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Multi-Institutional Implementation and Evaluation of a Curriculum for the Medical Student Clerkship in Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  Daniel W Golden; Steve Braunstein; Rachel B Jimenez; Pranshu Mohindra; Alexander Spektor; Jason C Ye
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Patterns and Perceptions of "Away" Rotations Among Radiation Oncology Residency Applicants.

Authors:  Baho U Sidiqi; Erin F Gillespie; Kaitlyn Lapen; C Jillian Tsai; Melissa Dawson; Abraham J Wu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 7.038

  7 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  Digital transfer in radiation oncology education for medical students-single-center data and systemic review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael Oertel; Niklas Benedikt Pepper; Martina Schmitz; Jan Carl Becker; Hans Theodor Eich
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Virtual student experiences: A case study of objectives, outcomes, and anticipated consequences.

Authors:  Eric Shappell; Daniel J Egan; Andrew Eyre; Eric Nadel; Kathleen Wittels
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-03-09

3.  Recruitment Challenges and Opportunities for Radiation Oncology Residency Programs During the 2020-2021 Virtual Residency Match.

Authors:  Bismarck Odei; Emma Brey Holliday; Reshma Jagsi; Fumiko Chino; Cole Schulmire; Mahesh Kudrimoti; Allen M Chen; Raju Raval; Denise Fabian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Increasing Medical Student Engagement Through Virtual Rotations in Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  Jenna M Kahn; Emma C Fields; Erqi Pollom; Loise Wairiri; Neha Vapiwala; Nima Nabavizadeh; Charles R Thomas; Rachel B Jimenez; Ravi A Chandra
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-08-29

5.  Networking and Applying to Radiation Oncology During A Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Survey of Medical Student Concerns.

Authors:  Erqi L Pollom; Navjot Sandhu; Christopher R Deig; Jean-Pierre Obeid; Jacob A Miller; Jenna M Kahn
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-02-04

Review 6.  A Framework for Assuring the Safety, Training, Evaluation, and Wellness of Radiation Oncology Residents During the COVID-19 Pandemic (ASTEROiD-COVID19).

Authors:  Christopher D Goodman; Rohann J M Correa; Andrew J Arifin; Robert E Dinniwell; Joanna M Laba; Timothy K Nguyen
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-07-17

7.  Students' Perspectives and Concerns for the 2020 to 2021 Radiation Oncology Interview Season.

Authors:  Ashlyn S Everett; Scott Strickler; Samuel R Marcrom; Andrew M McDonald
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08

8.  Opportunities to Improve Radiation Oncology Medical Education in the Post-Pandemic Era.

Authors:  Sarah Dooley; Austin J Sim; Shauna R Campbell; Elizabeth B Jeans; Justin D Anderson; Karen Tye; Chelain R Goodman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Challenges faced by women in radiology during the pandemic - A summary of the AAWR Women's Caucus at the ACR 2020 annual meeting.

Authors:  Shadi A Esfahani; Anna Lee; Jiun-Yiing Hu; Maria Kelly; Kirti Magudia; Catherine Everett; Margaret Szabunio; Susan Ackerman; Lucy B Spalluto
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.605

10.  Improving Diversity and Inclusion in the Post-Coronavirus Disease 2019 Era Through a Radiation Oncology Intensive Shadowing Experience (RISE).

Authors:  Idalid Franco; Oluwadamilola T Oladeru; Anurag Saraf; Kevin X Liu; Michael Milligan; Anthony Zietman; Paul L Nguyen; Ariel E Hirsch; Rachel B Jimenez
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.