Lisa Ni1, Steven J Chmura2, Daniel W Golden3. 1. Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: dgolden@radonc.uchicago.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess national trends in fourth-year medical student radiation oncology clerkships over the past 6 academic years. Results demonstrate a national trend toward inclusion of structured didactics in radiation oncology clerkships coinciding with the implementation and expansion of the Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group (ROECSG) clerkship curriculum. However, over half of clerkship experiences continue to lack a structured didactic curriculum. Over the past 6 years, the ROECSG implemented and expanded upon a national standardized curriculum for the fourth-year medical student radiation oncology clerkship. This study hypothesized that this would lead to increased use of structured clerkship educational methods on a national level. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2013 to 2018, all applicants to a single United States radiation oncology residency program were sent an anonymous clerkship experience survey. The χ2 test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of 1183 students, 488 completed the survey (41.3% response rate); 1303 total clerkship experiences were described. From 2013 to 2018, there has been a significant increase in clerkships with lectures designed for medical students, from 28.3% of clerkships in 2013 to 43.2% in 2018 (P = .02). Students who received ≥1 formal lecture perceived greater postclerkship confidence in radiation oncology-related knowledge (P < .01) and overall confidence in their ability to function as a postgraduate year-2 resident (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate a national trend toward inclusion of structured didactics in radiation oncology clerkships coinciding with the expansion of the ROECSG curriculum and support the addition of structured didactics to the clerkship experience to provide medical students with foundational radiation oncology knowledge to function as residents.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess national trends in fourth-year medical student radiation oncology clerkships over the past 6 academic years. Results demonstrate a national trend toward inclusion of structured didactics in radiation oncology clerkships coinciding with the implementation and expansion of the Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group (ROECSG) clerkship curriculum. However, over half of clerkship experiences continue to lack a structured didactic curriculum. Over the past 6 years, the ROECSG implemented and expanded upon a national standardized curriculum for the fourth-year medical student radiation oncology clerkship. This study hypothesized that this would lead to increased use of structured clerkship educational methods on a national level. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2013 to 2018, all applicants to a single United States radiation oncology residency program were sent an anonymous clerkship experience survey. The χ2 test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of 1183 students, 488 completed the survey (41.3% response rate); 1303 total clerkship experiences were described. From 2013 to 2018, there has been a significant increase in clerkships with lectures designed for medical students, from 28.3% of clerkships in 2013 to 43.2% in 2018 (P = .02). Students who received ≥1 formal lecture perceived greater postclerkship confidence in radiation oncology-related knowledge (P < .01) and overall confidence in their ability to function as a postgraduate year-2 resident (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate a national trend toward inclusion of structured didactics in radiation oncology clerkships coinciding with the expansion of the ROECSG curriculum and support the addition of structured didactics to the clerkship experience to provide medical students with foundational radiation oncology knowledge to function as residents.
Authors: Daniel W Golden; David R Raleigh; Steven J Chmura; Matthew Koshy; Andrew R Howard Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-06-17 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Daniel W Golden; Alexander Spektor; Sonali Rudra; Mark C Ranck; Monica S Krishnan; Rachel B Jimenez; Akila N Viswanathan; Matthew Koshy; Andrew R Howard; Steven J Chmura Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-01-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jason C Ye; Pranshu Mohindra; Alexander Spektor; Monica S Krishnan; Steven J Chmura; Andrew R Howard; Akila N Viswanathan; Shannon M MacDonald; Nikhil G Thaker; Prajnan Das; Brandon R Mancini; Susan A Higgins; Steve Braunstein; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Kristin A Bradley; Arthur Y Hung; Charles R Thomas; Jordan Kharofa; Matt Wheatley; Adam Currey; Bhupesh Parashar; Kevin Du; Rachel B Jimenez; Daniel W Golden Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Daniel W Golden; Gregory E Kauffmann; Ryan P McKillip; Jeanne M Farnan; Yoon Soo Park; Alan Schwartz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Vikrant S Jagadeesan; David R Raleigh; Matthew Koshy; Andrew R Howard; Steven J Chmura; Daniel W Golden Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-01-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Daniel W Golden; Steve Braunstein; Rachel B Jimenez; Pranshu Mohindra; Alexander Spektor; Jason C Ye Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2015-09-26 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Jonathan J Oskvarek; Jeffrey V Brower; Pranshu Mohindra; David R Raleigh; Steven J Chmura; Daniel W Golden Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2016-09-18 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Erqi L Pollom; Navjot Sandhu; Jessica Frank; Jacob A Miller; Jean-Pierre Obeid; Noah Kastelowitz; Neil Panjwani; Scott G Soltys; Hilary P Bagshaw; Sarah S Donaldson; Kathleen Horst; Beth M Beadle; Daniel T Chang; Iris Gibbs Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-05-20
Authors: Camil Ciprian Mireștean; Roxana Irina Iancu; Dragoș Petru Teodor Iancu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 3.390