Literature DB >> 19487713

Meta-analysis: beta-blocker dose, heart rate reduction, and death in patients with heart failure.

Finlay A McAlister1, Natasha Wiebe, Justin A Ezekowitz, Alexander A Leung, Paul W Armstrong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that patients with heart failure receive beta-blockers in doses used in the trials that have proven their efficacy. Although the adverse effects of beta-blockade are dose-related, it is unclear whether the benefits are.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the survival benefits of beta-blockade in heart failure are associated with the magnitude of heart rate reduction or the beta-blocker dose. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SIGLE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, supplemented by hand-searches of bibliographies. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, placebo-controlled heart failure trials that reported all-cause mortality. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, beta-blocker dosing and heart rate reduction, and death. DATA SYNTHESIS: The mean left ventricular ejection fraction in the 23 beta-blocker trials ranged from 0.17 to 0.36, and more than 95% of the 19 209 patients had systolic dysfunction. The overall risk ratio for death was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.84); however, heterogeneity testing revealed moderate heterogeneity among trials (I (2) = 30%), which was associated with the magnitude of heart rate reduction achieved within each trial (P for meta-regression = 0.006). For every heart rate reduction of 5 beats/min with beta-blocker treatment, a commensurate 18% reduction (CI, 6% to 29%) in the risk for death occurred. No significant relationship between all-cause mortality and beta-blocker dosing was observed (risk ratio for death, 0.74 [CI, 0.64 to 0.86]) in high-dose beta-blocker trials vs. 0.78 [CI, 0.63 to 0.96] in low-dose beta-blocker trials; P for meta-regression = 0.69). LIMITATIONS: The analysis is based on aggregate data and resting heart rates. Few patients in these trials had bradycardia or diastolic dysfunction at baseline.
CONCLUSION: The magnitude of heart rate reduction is statistically significantly associated with the survival benefit of beta-blockers in heart failure, whereas the dose of beta-blocker is not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487713     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-11-200906020-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  122 in total

Review 1.  Is heart rate a treatment target in heart failure?

Authors:  Jan-Christian Reil; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Heart rate as an independent risk factor in patients with multiple organ dysfunction: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Robert S Hoke; Ursula Müller-Werdan; Christine Lautenschläger; Karl Werdan; Henning Ebelt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Therapeutic ranges of serum digoxin concentrations in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Zachary D Goldberger; Ary L Goldberger
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  [Safety of β-blockers. Prejudices and reality].

Authors:  E Erdmann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  Role of heart rate as a marker and mediator of poor outcome for patients with heart failure.

Authors:  John R Kapoor; Paul A Heidenreich
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-06

Review 6.  [Treatment of progressive heart failure: pharmacotherapy, resynchronization (CRT), surgery].

Authors:  Bernhard Maisch; Sabine Pankuweit
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Ivabradine in heart failure: to SHIFT or not to SHIFT.

Authors:  Andres Schuster; W H Wilson Tang
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2011-03

8.  Chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular therapeutics: time to close the evidence gaps.

Authors:  Tara I Chang; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Hotline sessions and clinical trial updates presented at the European Society of Cardiology Congress in Stockholm 2010.

Authors:  Matthias Lenski; Felix Mahfoud; Christian Werner; Axel Bauer; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 10.  CYP2D6 polymorphism and its impact on the clinical response to metoprolol: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maxime Meloche; Michael Khazaka; Imad Kassem; Amina Barhdadi; Marie-Pierre Dubé; Simon de Denus
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-05       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.