| Literature DB >> 32774440 |
Qiuyun Gu1, Xueying Cui1, Kun Du2, Bian Wang1, Wei Cai3,4, Qingya Tang4, Xiuhua Shen1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between selenium (Se) and insulin resistance remains unclear. We aim to explore the association between toenail Se levels and insulin resistance through a cross-sectional study comprising Chinese vegetarians and matched omnivores.Entities:
Keywords: Insulin resistance; Selenium; Toenail
Year: 2020 PMID: 32774440 PMCID: PMC7398369 DOI: 10.1186/s12986-020-00484-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Characteristics of the study population
| Vegan | Lacto-ovo-vegetarian ( | Vegetarian | Omnivore | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 36.84 ± 8.51 | 35.49 ± 8.85 | 35.96 ± 8.73 | 35.23 ± 8.93 |
| Female, % | 77.63 | 84.03 | 81.82 | 81.82 |
| Vegetarian duration (y) | 5.79 ± 4.46 | 5.52 ± 5.33 | 5.61 ± 5.04 | – |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.72 ± 2.27 | 21.17 ± 2.67 | 21.02 ± 2.54* | 22.53 ± 3.48 |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.81 ± 0.05 | 0.81 ± 0.05 | 0.81 ± 0.05* | 0 .84 ± 0 .05 |
| No alcohol, % | 98.68 | 93.75 | 95.45* | 81.36 |
| No smoking, % | 86.84 | 90.97 | 89.55 | 90.45 |
| Physical activity (min/wk) | 151.97 ± 181.98 | 93.16 ± 108.48 | 113.48 ± 140.75* | 82.86 ± 114.39 |
| Income (Yuan/month), % | ||||
| < 3000 | 17.11 | 19.44 | 18.64* | 25.45 |
| 3000 ~ 5000 | 22.37 | 17.36 | 19.09* | 20 |
| 5000 ~ 8000 | 18.42 | 29.17 | 25.45* | 24.10 |
| > 8000 | 42.10 | 34.03 | 36.82* | 30.45 |
| Energy (Kcal/d) | 1536.32 ± 541.52 | 1496.98 ± 503.67 | 1510.57 ± 516.17* | 1792.88 ± 583.46 |
| Protein (g/d) | 48.50 ± 23.94 | 44.48 ± 18.92 | 45.87 ± 20.83* | 71.52 ± 31.64 |
| Fat (g/d) | 39.49 ± 21.22 | 43.02 ± 21.31 | 41.80 ± 21.30* | 68.14 ± 34.66 |
| Carbohydrate (g/d) | 237.96 ± 90.39 | 227.55 ± 84.11 | 231.14 ± 86.26 | 217.14 ± 75.72 |
| Fiber (g/d) | 19.36 ± 11.89 | 13.63 ± 7.56** | 15.61 ± 9.65* | 12.04 ± 7.12 |
| FG (mmol/L) | 4.58 ± 0.29 | 4.66 ± 0 .80 | 4.63 ± 0.67* | 4.82 ± 0.40 |
| FI (mU/L) | 4.76 ± 2.67 | 4.96 ± 2.08 | 4.89 ± 2.30* | 6.03 ± 3.11 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.98 ± 0.56 | 1.05 ± 0.60 | 1.03 ± 0.59*(1) | 1.30 ± 0.71 |
| HOMA-β (%) | 91.26 ± 58.47 | 94.85 ± 42.97 | 93.61 ± 48.78 | 97.86 ± 62.42 |
| Insulin resistance (%) | 1.32 | 1.39 | 1.36%* | 5.45 |
| Dietary Se intake (μg/d) | 25.28 ± 23.89 | 25.83 ± 15.03 | 25.64 ± 18.52* | 55.14 ± 37.51 |
| Toenail Se (μg/g) | 0.46 ± 0.11 | 0.56 ± 0.17** | 0.53 ± 0.16*(1) | 0.69 ± 0.53 |
Abbreviations: BMI body mass index, FG fasting blood glucose, FI fasting insulin, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, HOMA-β homeostasis model assessment of β cell function
(1)Data were assessed with covariance controlling for age, sex, BMI, alcohol consumption, income, and daily dietary intakes (energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, and fiber)
*Statistical significance when comparing vegetarian and omnivore groups
**Statistical significance when comparing vegan and lacto-ovo-vegetarian groups
Multiple regression analysis for associations between toenail Se levels and glucose metabolic indexes in vegetarians and omnivores
| Vegetarian ( | Omnivore ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG (mmol/L) | Model 1 | 0.340 (− 0.224, 0.905) | 0.24 | 0.079 (− 0.022, 0.180) | 0.13 |
| Model 2 | 0.303 (− 0.278, 0.885) | 0.31 | 0.029 (− 0.065, 0.122) | 0.55 | |
| FI | Model 1 | 1.427 (−0.503, 3.357) | 0.15 | 1.294 (0.532, 2.056) | < 0.01 |
| Model 2 | 1.190 (−0.707, 3.086) | 0.22 | 1.030 (0.393, 1.667) | < 0.01 | |
| HOMA-IR | Model 1 | 0.358 (−0.136, 0.851) | 0.16 | 0.319 (0.144, 0.493) | < 0.01 |
| Model 2 | 0.288 (−0.201, 0.776) | 0.25 | 0.245 (0.098, 0.392) | < 0.01 | |
| HOMA-B(%) | Model 1 | 13.560 (−27.543, 54.663) | 0.52 | 8.99 (−6.67, 24.65) | 0.26 |
| Model 2 | 8.568 (−32.381, 49.517) | 0.68 | 9.99 (−4.44, 24.43) | 0.18 | |
Abbreviations: FG fasting blood glucose, FI fasting insulin, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, HOMA-β homeostasis model assessment of β cell function
Model 1:unadjusted regression
Model 2:regression with age, sex, BMI, alcohol consumption, income, and daily dietary intakes (energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, and fiber) controlled
Multiple regression analysis for associations between toenail Se levels and glucose metabolic indexes according to dietary Se intake in omnivores
| Dietary Se intake (μg/d) | < 60 ( | ≥60 ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG (mmol/L) | Model 1 | 0.391 (0.059, 0.723) | 0.06 | 0.034 (−0.072, 0.140) | 0.53 |
| Model 2 | 0.166 (−0.159, 0.491 | 0.32 | −0.025 (− 0.123, 0.073) | 0.62 | |
| FI (mU/L) | Model 1 | 2.330 (−0.410, 5.070) | 0.10 | 1.161 (0.469, 1.853) | < 0.01 |
| Model 2 | 2.146 (−0.710, 5.002) | 0.14 | 1.053 (0.415, 1.691) | < 0.01 | |
| HOMA-IR | Model 1 | 0.614 (0.001, 1.227 | 0.05 | 0.279 (0.112, 0.445) | < 0.01 |
| Model 2 | 0.504 (−0.140, 1.148) | 0.13 | 0.237 (0.079, 0.395) | < 0.01 | |
| HOMA-B (%) | Model 1 | −4.121 (−63.969, 55.726) | 0.89 | 11.041 (0.670, 21.412) | < 0.01 |
| Model 2 | 13.766 (−46.868, 74.400) | 0.66 | 13.271 (4.433, 22.109) | < 0.01 | |
Abbreviations: FG fasting blood glucose, FI fasting insulin, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, HOMA-β homeostasis model assessment of β cell function
Model 1:unadjusted regression
Model 2:regression with age, sex, BMI, alcohol consumption, income, and daily dietary intakes (energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, and fiber) controlled