| Literature DB >> 32774059 |
Meng Jiang1, Chang-Li Li2, Chun-Qiu Pan3, Wen-Zhi Lv4, Yu-Fei Ren5, Xin-Wu Cui6, Christoph F Dietrich7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) caused by superior mesenteric venous thrombosis (SMVT) remains undetermined and early detection of transmural bowel infarction (TBI) is crucial. The predisposition to develop TBI is of clinical concern, which can lead to fatal sepsis with hemodynamic instability and multi-organ failure. Early resection of necrotic bowel could improve the prognosis of AMI, however, accurate prediction of TBI remains a challenge for clinicians. When determining the eligibility for explorative laparotomy, the underlying risk factors for bowel infarction should be fully evaluated. AIM: To develop and externally validate a nomogram for prediction of TBI in patients with acute SMVT.Entities:
Keywords: Acute mesenteric ischemia; Nomogram; Predictors; Reversible intestinal ischemia; Superior mesenteric venous thrombosis; Transmural bowel infarction
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32774059 PMCID: PMC7383843 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i26.3800
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1007-9327 Impact factor: 5.742
Figure 1Flow diagram of study populations. A: Training cohort; B: Validation cohort. SMVT: Superior mesenteric venous thrombosis; AMI: Acute mesenteric ischemia.
Participant characteristics
| Age, yrs | 48.5 ± 13.2 | 51.3 ± 8.2 | 0.07 |
| Gender | 0.52 | ||
| Male | 145 (70.0) | 59 (66.3) | |
| Female | 62 (30.0) | 30 (33.7) | |
| Tobacco use | 40 (19.3) | 25 (28.1) | 0.09 |
| Coexisting medical conditions | |||
| Hypertension | 19 (9.2) | 13 (14.6) | 0.17 |
| Diabetes | 20 (9.7) | 13 (14.6) | 0.22 |
| Ischemic heart disease | 8 (3.9) | 9 (10.1) | 0.05 |
| Previous history of DVT | 39 (18.8) | 17 (19.1) | 0.81 |
| Malignant disease | 24 (2.4) | 5 (5.6) | 0.11 |
| Clinical manifestations | |||
| Diarrhea | 22 (10.6) | 14 (15.7) | 0.22 |
| Hematochezia or melena | 62 (30.0) | 19 (21.3) | 0.13 |
| Fever | 26 (12.6) | 13 (14.6) | 0.63 |
| Physical findings | |||
| Abdominal distention | 109 (52.7) | 37 (41.6) | 0.16 |
| Abdominal tenderness | 39 (18.8) | 24 (27.0) | 0.12 |
| Rebound tenderness | 38 (18.4) | 21 (23.6) | 0.3 |
| Laboratory findings | |||
| White blood cells, 109/L | 7.0 (4.7-11.4) | 11.0 (7.5-14.4) | 0.05 |
| Hemoglobin, g/L | 109 (82-122) | 113 (92-130) | 0.11 |
| Platelets, 109/L | 191 (100-288) | 168 (133-214) | 0.06 |
| C-reactive protein, mg/L | 51.3 (7.7-67.5) | 53.9 (18.2-75.1) | 0.23 |
| Serum lactate levels, mmol/L | 4.3 (2.7-6.5) | 3.9 (1.3-5.7) | 0.31 |
| Creatinine, µmol/L | 72 (60-91) | 76 (65-108) | 0.07 |
| D-dimer, mg/L | 16.9 (3.0-179.6) | 14.1 (6.9-60.2) | 0.61 |
| Procalcitonin, µg/L | 0.5 (0.4-0.6) | 0.4 (0.1-1.8) | 0.17 |
| Radiologic features | |||
| Distal thrombosis | 63 (30.4) | 25 (28.1%) | 0.69 |
| Portal vein or/and splenic vein extension | 143 (69.1) | 54 (60.7) | 0.16 |
| Decreased bowel wall enhancement | 70 (33.8) | 36 (40.4) | 0.28 |
| Bowel wall thickening | 42 (21.3) | 19 (21.3) | 0.84 |
| Bowel loop dilation | 41 (19.8) | 16 (18.0) | 0.71 |
| Pneumatosis intestinalis | 52 (25.1) | 27 (30.3) | 0.13 |
| Ascites | 91 (44.0) | 31 (34.8) | 0.14 |
| Other risk factors | |||
| Recent surgery | 46 (22.2) | 15 (16.9) | 0.3 |
| Intraperitoneal inflammation | 73 (35.3) | 31 (34.8) | 0.94 |
| Liver cirrhosis | 82 (39.6) | 37 (41.6) | 0.75 |
Data are median (IQR) or n (%). P values were calculated by Mann-Whitney U test, t test, χ² test, or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. DVT: Deep venous thrombosis.
Univariate analysis of risk factors associated with transmural bowel infarction in the training cohort
| Age, yr | 0.97 (0.95-0.99) | 0.01 |
| Gender, male | 2.22 (1.06-4.65) | 0.03 |
| Tobacco use | 1.03 (0.48-2.23) | 0.94 |
| Hypertension | 1.10 (0.38-3.20) | 0.86 |
| Diabetes | 3.85 (0.86-17.14) | 0.08 |
| Ischemic heart disease | 2.81 (0.34-23.36) | 0.34 |
| Previous history of DVT | 3.14 (1.53-6.47) | 0.002 |
| Malignant disease | 0.41 (0.21-1.78) | 0.99 |
| Diarrhea | 1.04 (0.39-2.81) | 0.93 |
| Hematochezia | 2.53 (1.33-4.79) | 0.004 |
| Fever | 1.16 (0.47-2.83) | 0.75 |
| Abdominal distention | 3.56 (1.82-6.97) | < 0.001 |
| Abdominal tenderness | 7.25 (3.40-15.46) | < 0.001 |
| Rebound tenderness | 9.14 (4.17-20.04) | < 0.001 |
| White blood cells, > 10 × 109/L | 1.12 (1.06-1.17) | < 0.001 |
| Hemoglobin, > 120 g/L | 1.01 (1.00-1.02) | 0.35 |
| Platelets, > 100 × 109/L | 1.00 (0.99-1.01) | 0.96 |
| C-reactive protein, > 50 mg/L | 1.02 (1.01-1.02) | 0.05 |
| Serum lactate levels, > 2 mmol/L | 6.53 (3.27-13.04) | < 0.001 |
| Creatinine, > 106 µmol/L | 2.05 (0.96-4.41) | 0.07 |
| D-dimer, > 0.5 mg/L | 1.00 (1.00-1.01) | 0.50 |
| Procalcitonin, > 0.5 µg/L | 1.02 (0.92-1.12) | 0.72 |
| Distal thrombosis | 2.13 (1.07-4.36) | 0.02 |
| Portal vein or/and splenic vein extension | 1.01 (0.52-1.94) | 0.98 |
| Decreased bowel wall enhancement | 9.00 (4.24-19.12) | < 0.001 |
| Bowel wall thickening | 1.99 (0.98-2.01) | 0.24 |
| Bowel loop dilation | 2.21 (1.67-3.54) | 0.03 |
| Pneumatosis intestinalis | 1.36 (1.23-3.15) | 0.04 |
| Ascites | 1.40 (0.76-2.58) | 0.28 |
| Recent surgery | 1.13 (0.54-2.38) | 0.74 |
| Intraperitoneal inflammation | 1.63 (0.84-3.16) | 0.15 |
| Liver cirrhosis | 2.44 (1.28-4.68) | 0.007 |
OR: Odd ratio; CI: Confidence interval; DVT: Deep venous thrombosis.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with transmural bowel infarction in the training cohort
| Decreased bowel wall enhancement | 1.85 | 6.37 | 2.55-15.90 | < 0.001 |
| Rebound tenderness | 1.97 | 7.14 | 2.73-18.65 | < 0.001 |
| Serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L | 1.44 | 3.14 | 1.33-7.41 | 0.009 |
| DVT history | 1.81 | 6.37 | 2.55-15.90 | < 0.001 |
OR: Odd ratio; CI: Confidence interval; DVT: Deep venous thrombosis.
Figure 2Nomogram for evaluation of transmural bowel infarction risk and its predictive performance. A: Nomogram for estimating the risk of transmural bowel infarction (TBI) in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). The nomogram is used to find the position of each variable on the corresponding axis, draw a line to the points axis for the number of points, add the points from all of the variables, and draw a line from the total points axis to determine the risk of TBI at the lower line of the nomogram. For example, a 30-year-old male patient (have transmural bowel infarction finally) with a previous history of deep venous thrombosis and serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L, no rebound tenderness and no decreased bowel wall enhancement, has a risk of 59% of TBI calculated by the nomogram; B and C: Calibration curves of the nomogram in the training and validation sets, respectively. Calibration curves depict the calibration of the model in terms of the agreement between the predicted probabilities of TBI and observed outcomes of TBI. The dotted blue line represents an ideal prediction, and the dotted red line represents the predictive ability of the nomogram. The closer the dotted red line fit is to the dotted blue line, the better the predictive accuracy of the nomogram is; D and E: The ROC curves of the nomogram in the training and validation sets, respectively. TBI: Transmural bowel infarction; AMI: Acute mesenteric ischemia; DVT: Deep venous thrombosis; AUC: Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; ROC: Receiver operator characteristic curve.
Figure 3Decision curve analysis for the nomogram. A: The Y-axis shows the net benefit. The X-axis shows the corresponding risk threshold. The green line represents the assumption that all patients have transmural bowel infarction (TBI). The thin black line represents the assumption that no patients have TBI. The red line represents the nomogram. The decision curve in the validation cohort indicated that if the threshold probability is between 0 and 1.0, then using the nomogram to predict TBI adds more benefit than the treat-all-patients scheme or treat-none scheme; B: Clinical impact curve for the risk model. Of 1000 patients, the red solid line shows the total number who would be deemed at high risk for each risk threshold. The green dashed line shows how many of those would be true positives cases. DCA: Decision curve analysis; TBI: Transmural bowel infarction.
Performance of the nomogram for estimating the risk of transmural bowel infarction
| Cutoff value | 90 | 90 |
| AUC | 0.860 (0.771-0.925) | 0.851 (0.796-0.897) |
| Sensitivity, % | 88.89 (71.94-96.15) | 84.48 (73.07-91.62) |
| Specificity, % | 67.74 (55.37-78.05) | 71.81 (64.11-78.42) |
| Positive predictive value, % | 54.55 (40.07-68.29) | 53.85 (43.66-63.72) |
| Negative predictive value, % | 93.33 (82.14-97.71) | 92.24 (85.91-95.86) |
| Positive likelihood ratio | 2.76 (2.43-3.07) | 3.00 (2.84-3.16) |
| Negative likelihood ratio | 0.16 (0.08-0.32) | 0.22 (0.17-0.27) |
| Diagnostic accuracy, % | 74.16 (64.20-82.12) | 75.36 (69.07-80.73) |
AUC: Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; CI: Confidence interval.