Literature DB >> 32773639

Portable Automated Surveillance of Surgical Site Infections Using Natural Language Processing: Development and Validation.

Brian T Bucher1, Jianlin Shi2, Jeffrey P Ferraro3, David E Skarda1,3, Matthew H Samore4,5, John F Hurdle2, Adi V Gundlapalli4, Wendy W Chapman2, Samuel R G Finlayson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We present the development and validation of a portable NLP approach for automated surveillance of SSIs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The surveillance of SSIs is labor-intensive limiting the generalizability and scalability of surgical quality surveillance programs.
METHODS: We abstracted patient clinical text notes after surgical procedures from 2 independent healthcare systems using different electronic healthcare records. An SSI detected as part of the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used as the reference standard. We developed a rules-based NLP system (Easy Clinical Information Extractor [CIE]-SSI) for operative event-level detection of SSIs using an training cohort (4574 operative events) from 1 healthcare system and then conducted internal validation on a blind cohort from the same healthcare system (1850 operative events) and external validation on a blind cohort from the second healthcare system (15,360 operative events). EasyCIE-SSI performance was measured using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver-operating-curve (AUC).
RESULTS: The prevalence of SSI was 4% and 5% in the internal and external validation corpora. In internal validation, EasyCIE-SSI had a sensitivity, specificity, AUC of 94%, 88%, 0.912 for the detection of SSI, respectively. In external validation, EasyCIE-SSI had sensitivity, specificity, AUC of 79%, 92%, 0.852 for the detection of SSI, respectively. The sensitivity of EasyCIE-SSI decreased in clean, skin/subcutaneous, and outpatient procedures in the external validation compared to internal validation.
CONCLUSION: Automated surveillance of SSIs can be achieved using NLP of clinical notes with high sensitivity and specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32773639      PMCID: PMC9040555          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   13.787


  31 in total

1.  Simplifying likelihood ratios.

Authors:  Steven McGee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Document-level classification of CT pulmonary angiography reports based on an extension of the ConText algorithm.

Authors:  Brian E Chapman; Sean Lee; Hyunseok Peter Kang; Wendy W Chapman
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  HITECH spurs EHR vendor competition and innovation, resulting in increased adoption.

Authors:  Seth Joseph; Max Sow; Michael F Furukawa; Steven Posnack; Mary Ann Chaffee
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Monitoring and reporting hospital-acquired conditions: a federalist approach.

Authors:  Nathan West; Terry Eng
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2015-01-06

6.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Exploring the frontier of electronic health record surveillance: the case of postoperative complications.

Authors:  Fern FitzHenry; Harvey J Murff; Michael E Matheny; Nancy Gentry; Elliot M Fielstein; Steven H Brown; Ruth M Reeves; Dominik Aronsky; Peter L Elkin; Vincent P Messina; Theodore Speroff
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Informatics and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: automated processes could replace manual record review.

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Michael J Englesbe; John A Cowan; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.

Authors:  Xavier Robin; Natacha Turck; Alexandre Hainard; Natalia Tiberti; Frédérique Lisacek; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Markus Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records.

Authors:  Joshua C Mandel; David A Kreda; Kenneth D Mandl; Isaac S Kohane; Rachel B Ramoni
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Data Science Trends Relevant to Nursing Practice: A Rapid Review of the 2020 Literature.

Authors:  Brian J Douthit; Rachel L Walden; Kenrick Cato; Cynthia P Coviak; Christopher Cruz; Fabio D'Agostino; Thompson Forbes; Grace Gao; Theresa A Kapetanovic; Mikyoung A Lee; Lisiane Pruinelli; Mary A Schultz; Ann Wieben; Alvin D Jeffery
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Surgical Quality Assessment: Hype or Hope?

Authors:  Brian T Bucher
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 6.532

3.  Natural language processing for the surveillance of postoperative venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Jianlin Shi; John F Hurdle; Stacy A Johnson; Jeffrey P Ferraro; David E Skarda; Samuel R G Finlayson; Matthew H Samore; Brian T Bucher
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.348

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.