Literature DB >> 3277239

Small renal cell carcinomas: resolving a diagnostic dilemma.

M A Amendola1, R L Bree, H M Pollack, I R Francis, G M Glazer, S Z Jafri, J E Tomaszewski.   

Abstract

Thirty-nine patients with pathologically proved renal cell carcinomas 3 cm or les in diameter were examined. Results of intravenous urography (n = 30) were true positive in 20 patients and false negative in ten (sensitivity, 67%). Renal ultrasound (US) (n = 29) had true-positive results in 23 patients and false-negative results in six (sensitivity, 79%); computed tomography (CT) (n = 36) had true-positive results in 34 and false-negative results in two (sensitivity, 94%). For selective renal angiography (n = 35%), the results were true positive in 26 and false negative in nine (sensitivity, 74%), with typical hypervascular renal cell carcinomas demonstrated in 17. Finally, the findings of percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy were true positive in one of five patients when US guidance was used (sensitivity, 20%) and in five of eight when CT guidance was used (sensitivity, 62%). Small renal cell carcinomas are more frequently encountered in clinical practice than heretofore realized, and they are best imaged by CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3277239     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.166.3.3277239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Efficiency of [(18)F]FDG PET in characterising renal cancer and detecting distant metastases: a comparison with CT.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Olivier Cappele; Philippe Bottet; Henri Bensadoun; Armelle Regeasse; François Comoz; Franck Sobrio; Gérard Bouvard; Denis Agostini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-07-04       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Using neural networks to diagnose cancer.

Authors:  P S Maclin; J Dempsey; J Brooks; J Rand
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  K H Tsui; A van Ophoven; O Shvarts; A Belldegrun
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  1999

4.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound of renal masses.

Authors:  Andre Ignee; Bernd Straub; Gudrun Schuessler; Christoph Frank Dietrich
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-01-28

5.  Clinicopathological characteristics of small renal cell carcinomas.

Authors:  M Takashi; Y Takagi; T Sakata; T Shimoji; K Miyake
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Is there a need for pelvic CT scan in cases of renal cell carcinoma?

Authors:  Anurag Khaitan; Narmada P Gupta; Ashok K Hemal; P N Dogra; Amlesh Seth; Monish Aron
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Persistent hematuria caused by renal cell carcinoma after aortic valve replacement and warfarin therapy.

Authors:  Sumera Bukhari; Afolarin Amodu; Michael Akinyemi; Sara Wallach
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2017-07

8.  CT after enucleation of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  H U Kauczor; S Schadmand-Fischer; D Filipas; H C Schwickert; F Steinbach; H H Schild; M Thelen
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug

9.  The characterization of small hypoattenuating renal masses on contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  Neesha S Patel; Liina Poder; Zhen J Wang; Benjamin M Yeh; Aliya Qayyum; Hua Jin; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 10.  Imaging and management of the incidentally discovered renal mass.

Authors:  Jonathon Willatt; Isaac R Francis
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.