Literature DB >> 32771051

Bioinformatics analysis of differentially expressed genes in subchondral bone in early experimental osteoarthritis using microarray data.

Zhao Wang1, Yong Ji2, Hong-Wei Bao1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common arthritic disease in humans, affecting the majority of individuals over 65 years of age. The aim of this study is to identify the gene expression profile specific to subchondral bone in OA by comparing the different expression profiles in experimental and sham-operation groups.
METHODS: Gene expression profile GSE30322 was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained by limma package. And Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) databases were further used to identify the potential gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways. Furthermore, a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed and significant modules were extracted.
RESULTS: Totally, 588 DEGs were identified including 199 upregulated DEGs and 389 downregulated DEGs screened in OA and sham-operation. GO showed that DEGs were significantly enhanced for ribosomal subunit export from nucleus and molting cycle. KEGG pathway analysis revealed that target genes were enriched in thiamine metabolism.
CONCLUSION: These key candidate DEGs that affect the progression of OA, and these genes might serve as potential therapeutic targets for OA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioinformatics analysis; Differentially expressed genes; Gene ontology; Osteoarthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32771051      PMCID: PMC7414553          DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01839-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.359


Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease characterized by the gradual degeneration of articular cartilage, joint stiffness, and loss of function [1]. It was reported that over 27 million adults are affected by OA in the USA [2]. OA is a complex pathophysiological process involving inflammation, subchondral bone modification, and osteophyte formation. Subchondral bone alteration present to the cartilage degeneration and thus more studies should be focused on the subchondral bone alteration. Subchondral bone consists tripartite: subchondral bone plate, trabecular bone, and bone marrow space [3]. It has been stated that most of the OA patients accompanied by the alterations of the subchondral bone [4]. Subchondral bone could transport nutrients or cytokines to the overlying cartilage. Meanwhile, subchondral bone cells contacted with chondrocyte and thus influence cartilage metabolism. A better understanding of the early molecular mechanism changes of subchondral bone in vivo may contribute to elucidating the pathogenesis of OA. Therefore, it is crucial to explore the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in vivo and thus we could revealed new targets for OA [5]. Microarray technology has been used to obtain information on the genetic alteration that occurs during many diseases [6, 7]. Here, we downloaded the gene expression profile GSE30322 from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO), including gene expression data for subchondral bone samples from five medial meniscectomy and medial collateral ligament transection group and five sham-operated group. Based upon this research, identifying DEGs and enriching their functions and signaling pathways may help reveal potential targets of early OA.

Materials and methods

Gene expression microarray data

The gene expression profile GSE30322 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE30322) was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). GSE30322 was based on Agilent-014879 Whole Rat Genome Microarray 4x44K G4131F (Probe Name version) platform. GSE30322 dataset contained ten samples, including five bone 4 weeks post-surgery samples (E-group), and five sham-operated group (S-group) 4 weeks post-surgery samples.

DEGs in E-group and intact S-group samples

The raw data files were downloaded and then python scripts for matrix transformation were used. The analysis was carried out using Limma package from Bioconductor project. In this study, genes with P < .05 and [log fold change (FC)] > 2 were defined as DEGs. The DEGs data were then processed by R software (pheatmap package) to draw a heatmap and volcano plot.

GO and KEGG analysis of DEGs

Target genes list were submitted to the DAVID 6.8 (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) to analyze candidate DEG functions and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) of the overlapping genes. DEG functions, also named as Gene ontology (GO), mainly including biological process (BP), molecular function (MF), and cellular component (CC). P value less than 0.05 was considered as cut-off criterion [8-10].

Protein-protein interaction (PPI)

We used the online database STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes, https://string-db.org/) to better illustrate the potential interactive relationships among the DEGs [11]. Then, the Cytoscape software was utilized for analyzing the interactions with a combined score > 0.4 (http://www.cytoscape.org/). Finally, the plug-in Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) was used to filter the significant modules from the PPI network for the selection of hub genes (degree cut-off = 2, node score cut-off = 0.2, k-core = 2, and max. depth = 100) [12].

Results

Identification of DEGs

After analyzing, differentially expression gene profiles were obtained. Totally, 588 DEGs were identified including 199 upregulated DEGs and 389 downregulated DEGs screened in OA and sham-operation. Top 10 up-DEGs and down-DEGs were listed in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. A box plot of the sample data is provided in Fig. 1. Volcano plot of the different genes can be obtained in Fig. 2. Moreover, we provided heatmap of the top 50 different genes between E-group and S-group (Fig. 3).
Table 1

The top 10 upregulated DEGs in early experimental osteoarthritis with P value < 0.05

GenesymbollogFCP value
Rhox52.2713320.008302
Bex12.0359750.040834
RGD13090851.7261360.012291
Nsg11.6586210.001075
Klhdc51.633770.007725
Trpc41.6090580.003723
Klrd11.6067620.00939
Fgfbp31.6047290.000907
Gzma1.5881010.011649
Nr4a31.5509331.16E-05
Table 2

The top 10 downregulated DEGs in early experimental osteoarthritis with P value < 0.05

GenesymbollogFCP value
Ric8a− 4.510463.57E−06
Fth1− 4.093652.18E−05
LOC305052− 4.02161.25E−10
Pygl− 3.735893.01E−08
Cks2− 3.615843.06E−07
Usp4− 3.607992.21E−05
Rasl2-9− 3.578911.54E−08
Cpox− 3.503553.86E−10
Rab7a− 3.431181.07E−08
Tmsb10− 3.407381.24E−10
Fig. 1

Box plot for the sample data after normalization

Fig. 2

Volcano plot of the different genes in E-group and S-group

Fig. 3

Heat map of the top fifty different genes in E-group and S-group

The top 10 upregulated DEGs in early experimental osteoarthritis with P value < 0.05 The top 10 downregulated DEGs in early experimental osteoarthritis with P value < 0.05 Box plot for the sample data after normalization Volcano plot of the different genes in E-group and S-group Heat map of the top fifty different genes in E-group and S-group

GO term enrichment analysis of DEGs

Gene Ontology (GO) showed that up-DEGs were significantly enhanced for ribosomal subunit export from nucleus, ribosome localization, regulation of hemopoiesis, negative regulation of hemopoiesis, and rRNA-containing ribonucleoprotein complex export from nucleus. Downregulated DEGs were enriched for the molting cycle, hair cycle, molting cycle process, hair cycle process, and the skin epidermis development (Table 3 and Fig. 4).
Table 3

Gene ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes in E-group and S-group according to BP, CC and MF

ONTOLOGYDescriptionP valueP adjustgname
BPRibosomal subunit export from nucleus0.0006590.43601RASL2-9/SDAD1/ZFP593/RPS15
BPRibosome localization0.0006590.43601RASL2-9/SDAD1/ZFP593/RPS15
BPRegulation of hemopoiesis0.0006980.43601ADRM1/LEO1/CSF1/HMGB2/CALCA/RARA/ITPKB/NFE2L2/MEIS2/ERBB2/IHH/GPR171/INHBA/TNFSF9/PPP2R3C/MIXL1/HIST2H4/GNAS/IL1F8/ZAP70/RGD1309676
BPNegative regulation of hemopoiesis0.0010310.43601LEO1/CALCA/RARA/ITPKB/NFE2L2/MEIS2/ERBB2/IHH/GPR171/MIXL1/HIST2H4
BPrRNA-containing ribonucleoprotein complex export from nucleus0.0010630.43601RASL2-9/SDAD1/ZFP593/RPS15
BPHair follicle development0.0010790.43601SAV1/VANGL2/LHX2/GAL/INHBA/RBPJ/GNAS/LGR4/PRSS8
BPMolting cycle0.0010830.43601SAV1/VANGL2/LHX2/GAL/INHBA/RBPJ/GNAS/LGR4/ARNTL/PRSS8
BPHair cycle0.0010830.43601SAV1/VANGL2/LHX2/GAL/INHBA/RBPJ/GNAS/LGR4/ARNTL/PRSS8
BPMolting cycle process0.0012450.43601SAV1/VANGL2/LHX2/GAL/INHBA/RBPJ/GNAS/LGR4/PRSS8
BPHair cycle process0.0012450.43601SAV1/VANGL2/LHX2/GAL/INHBA/RBPJ/GNAS/LGR4/PRSS8
CCCytosolic small ribosomal subunit0.0003550.163784LOC297756/RPS7/RPS26/RPS27A/RGD1565117/RGD1562381/RPS15/RGD1559808
CCNuclear speck0.0020820.276812SURF2/EP400/SRSF2/PACSIN2/GLYR1/BASP1/KIF22/SNRPB2/MORF4L1/SMC4/CKAP4/TCF3/NR3C1/HSPB3/HSPA1B/CDK12/CNOT7/EAF2
CCBlood microparticle0.0028090.276812ACTC1/CPN2/HBE1/PRSS1/HSPA1B/ACTG2/PROS1/HSPA1L/SERPINF2
CCSmall ribosomal subunit0.0029910.276812LOC297756/RPS7/RPS26/RPS27A/RGD1565117/RGD1562381/RPS15/RGD1559808
CCCytosolic ribosome0.0030020.276812LOC297756/RPL34/RPS7/LOC306079/RPS26/SURF6/RPS27A/RGD1565117/RGD1562381/RPS15/RGD1559808
CCAutophagosome membrane0.0036160.27785RAB7A/LAMP2/STX17/PRKD1
CCNuclear chromatin0.0046890.308812EP400/ARID1A/RBMXRTL/SFR1/HMGB2/RARA/CBX5/SMARCA5/MORF4L1/PSIP1/TCF3/RUNX2/MIXL1/ETV3/HIST2H4/HIST1H1A/MXD1/HIST1H1B
CCAutophagosome0.0163930.669112FTH1/RAB7A/LAMP2/STX17/PRKD1/ATG12
CCDNA packaging complex0.0165740.669112HIST2H2BE/GLYR1/SMC4/TCF3/HIST2H4/HIST1H1A/HIST1H1B
CCLateral plasma membrane0.0168080.669112VANGL2/NSG1/PKD1/FGF13/GJB2
MFRepressing transcription factor binding0.005450.759982CBX5/TCF3/RUNX2/RBPJ/MIXL1/ARNTL
MFStructural constituent of ribosome0.0063630.759982LOC297756/RPL34/RGD1564617/RPS7/RGD1562397/LOC306079/RPS26/RPS27A/RGD1565117/LOC100360679/RGD1562381/RPS15/MRPL3/RGD1559808
MFRNA polymerase II core promoter proximal region sequence-specific DNA binding0.006420.759982NR4A3/LHX2/TCF3/NR3C1/ZFP384/ALS2CR8/MEIS2/RUNX2/GMEB2/SOX6/RBPJ/HIVEP2/NKX6-1/MIXL1/PITX3/BCL11B/FOXS1/PAX1/MXD1/CRX
MFTranscription factor activity, RNA polymerase II core promoter proximal region sequence-specific binding0.0087080.759982NR4A3/LHX2/TCF3/NR3C1/ZFP384/ALS2CR8/MEIS2/RUNX2/SOX6/RBPJ/HIVEP2/NKX6-1/MIXL1/PITX3/BCL11B/FOXS1/PAX1/MXD1/ARNTL/CRX
MFCore promoter proximal region sequence-specific DNA binding0.0089250.759982NR4A3/LHX2/TCF3/NR3C1/ZFP384/ALS2CR8/MEIS2/RUNX2/GMEB2/SOX6/RBPJ/HIVEP2/NKX6-1/MIXL1/PITX3/BCL11B/FOXS1/PAX1/MXD1/CRX
MFCore promoter proximal region DNA binding0.0093720.759982NR4A3/LHX2/TCF3/NR3C1/ZFP384/ALS2CR8/MEIS2/RUNX2/GMEB2/SOX6/RBPJ/HIVEP2/NKX6-1/MIXL1/PITX3/BCL11B/FOXS1/PAX1/MXD1/CRX
MFManganese ion binding0.0110640.759982GLUL/XPNPEP1/IMPA1/ARG1/TDP2
MFTranscriptional activator activity, RNA polymerase II core promoter proximal region sequence-specific binding0.0111410.759982NR4A3/LHX2/TCF3/NR3C1/ZFP384/ALS2CR8/MEIS2/RUNX2/RBPJ/HIVEP2/MIXL1/PITX3/BCL11B/PAX1/CRX
MFHistone binding0.0117850.759982CKS2/GLYR1/HMGB2/PHF1/CBX5/SMARCA5/USP15/ING1/ATAD2/HIST2H4/RAG2
MFMethylated histone binding0.0161670.759982GLYR1/PHF1/CBX5/ING1/RAG2
Fig. 4

Gene ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes in E-group and S-group

Gene ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes in E-group and S-group according to BP, CC and MF Gene ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes in E-group and S-group

KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs

The result of KEGG pathway analysis revealed that target genes were enriched in thiamine metabolism, regulation of lipolysis in adipocytes, central carbon metabolism in cancer, estrogen signaling pathway, collecting duct acid secretion, Rap1 signaling pathway, measles, sphingolipid metabolism, drug metabolism-other enzymes, and circadian rhythm. These key pathways were showed in Table 4 and Fig. 5.
Table 4

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in E-group and S-group

IDDescriptionpvaluep.adjustgname
rno00730Thiamine metabolism0.0095850.866414ALPL/AKP3/AK1
rno04923Regulation of lipolysis in adipocytes0.0186130.866414GNAI3/PIK3CD/PLA2G16/AQP7/GNAS
rno05230Central carbon metabolism in cancer0.0256830.866414PDHA1/HK1/PIK3CD/PFKP/ERBB2
rno04915Estrogen signaling pathway0.0263690.866414GNAI3/TFF1/PIK3CD/RARA/HSPA1B/ITPR1/GNAS/HSPA1L
rno04966Collecting duct acid secretion0.0339550.866414ATP6V1G3/ATP6V1E1/CLCNKB
rno05162Measles0.0394540.866414PIK3CD/IFIH1/EIF3H/RAB9A/FASLG/HSPA1B/CCND3/HSPA1L
rno00600Sphingolipid metabolism0.0406580.866414B4GALT6/PPAP2B/ACER2/CERS1
rno00983Drug metabolism—other enzymes0.0424380.866414ITPA/CES2A/UGT2B5/GUSB/GSTA5/NAT2
rno04710Circadian rhythm0.0444880.866414PRKAB2/ARNTL/PER3
Fig. 5

The results of KEGG pathways enrichment analysis for DEGs based on clusterProfiler

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in E-group and S-group The results of KEGG pathways enrichment analysis for DEGs based on clusterProfiler

Interaction network of DEGs and core genes in the interaction network

Using data from the Cytoscape and STRING databases, the 10 hub nodes with the greatest degree of network connection were determined. The top 10 hub genes identified were RASL2-9, PSMD6, CPOX, FTH1, PYGL, GNAI1, PTPN1, RIC8A, RAB7A, LOC680441, USP4, and HIST2H2BE (Fig. 6 and Table 3). We listed top three MCODE results in Fig. 7.
Fig. 6

Protein-protein interaction network of differentially expressed genes. Red nodes represent upregulated genes. Blue nodes represent downregulated genes. Green nodes represent the top 10 genes. Nodes > 10 was set as cut-off criteria

Fig. 7

The top 3 modules from the gene–gene interaction network. The squares represent the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in modules, and the lines show the interaction between the DEGs

Protein-protein interaction network of differentially expressed genes. Red nodes represent upregulated genes. Blue nodes represent downregulated genes. Green nodes represent the top 10 genes. Nodes > 10 was set as cut-off criteria The top 3 modules from the gene–gene interaction network. The squares represent the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in modules, and the lines show the interaction between the DEGs

Discussion

Subchondral bone remodeling is regulated by the bone resorption and bone formation, which mainly regulated by osteoclast and osteoblast respectively. Despite advancements in the understanding of the mechanism of OA, an effective method for accelerating the process remains to be identified. In this analysis, we found that 588 DEGs between E-group and S-group. Bone remodeling is regulated by the balanced processes of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and osteoblast-mediated bone formation [13, 14]. Disequilibrium of this balance leads to dysregulated bone tissue remodeling and can result in excessive bone loss or extra bone formation and consequent skeletal disease [15]. We identified DEGs that play roles in osteoclast and osteoblast differentiation and function in the early stages of OA in this model. Previous studies identified that an altered phenotype of subchondral osteoblasts and osteoclasts contribute to OA progress. Lamas et al. [16] reported that COL10A1 downregulation seems to have a role in the establishment of a defective and/or unstable subchondral cartilage matrix in OA disease. Ren et al. [17] used gene expression profile GSE103416 to identify the different expression genes and potential pathways. Results show that Gna13/cGMP-PKG signaling pathway was identified as a potential research target for therapy and for further understanding the development of OA. We further performed Kegg pathways to identify the potential pathways that involving in the progress of OA. We found that Rap1 signaling pathway was the most obvious different signaling pathways. For Rap1 signaling pathway, we found nine DEGs (GNAI3/RAPGEF5/CSF1/PIK3CD/MK1/LPAR2/P2RY1/GNAS/PRKD1/RASSF5). Another potential pathway was estrogen signaling pathway. Ren et al. [17] used gene expression profile GSE103416 and found that Gna13/cGMP-PKG signaling pathway was identified as a potential research target for therapy and for further understanding the development of OA. Feng et al. [18] revealed that PDGFRB, IFNG, EGR1, FASLG, and H3F3B may be the potential targets for OA diagnosis and treatment. Liang Y al [19]. found that estrogen deficiency is closely related to the development of menopausal arthritis including OA. Estrogen acts via ER and miR-140 to inhibit the catabolic activity of proteases within the chondrocyte extracellular matrix. We also found that Rap1 signaling pathway participated into the pathological process of OA. Zhang et al. [20] performed a gene expression analyses of subchondral bone in early experimental osteoarthritis by microarray. Results found that Alp, Igf1, Tgf β1, Postn, Mmp3, Tnfsf11, Acp5, Bmp5, Aspn, and Ihh genes that involved in the pathological process of OA, and they also performed PCR to identify these DEGs in the OA and normal cartilage. Kovács et al. [21] also revealed that the Wnt and the OPG-RANKL-RANK signaling systems, as key mediators, interact in subchondral bone remodeling in OA development, which indicated that subchondral bone remodeling also affects OA. Zhou et al. [22] revealed that matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)1, MMP3, MMP13, and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) are associated with human developmental chondrogenesis.

Conclusion

In summary, totally, 588 DEGs were identified including 199 upregulated DEGs and 389 downregulated DEGs screened in OA and sham-operation. We identified 12 core genes, including RASL2-9, PSMD6, CPOX, FTH1, PYGL, GNAI1, PTPN1, RIC8A, RAB7A, LOC680441, USP4, and HIST2H2BE. Additional experimental studies will be needed to validate our findings.
  22 in total

1.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Microstructural alterations of femoral head articular cartilage and subchondral bone in osteoarthritis and osteoporosis.

Authors:  D Bobinac; M Marinovic; E Bazdulj; O Cvijanovic; T Celic; I Maric; J Spanjol; T Cicvaric
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 3.  The bone-cartilage unit in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Rik J Lories; Frank P Luyten
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Identification of genes and pathways associated with osteoarthritis by bioinformatics analyses.

Authors:  Z Feng; K-J Lian
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.507

5.  Large-scale gene expression in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: a putative role for COL10A1 in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  José Ramón Lamas; Luis Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Ana G Vigo; Roberto Alvarez-Lafuente; Pedro López-Romero; Fernando Marco; Emilio Camafeita; Ana Dopazo; Sergio Callejas; Esther Villafuertes; José Antonio Hoyas; María Pilar Tornero-Esteban; Elena Urcelay; Benjamín Fernández-Gutiérrez
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Activation of the IGF1 pathway mediates changes in cellular contractility and motility in single-suture craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Zeinab Al-Rekabi; Marsha M Wheeler; Andrea Leonard; Adriane M Fura; Ilsa Juhlin; Christopher Frazar; Joshua D Smith; Sarah S Park; Jennifer A Gustafson; Christine M Clarke; Michael L Cunningham; Nathan J Sniadecki
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  The burden of osteoarthritis: clinical and quality-of-life issues.

Authors:  Roland W Moskowitz
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life.

Authors:  Damian Szklarczyk; Andrea Franceschini; Stefan Wyder; Kristoffer Forslund; Davide Heller; Jaime Huerta-Cepas; Milan Simonovic; Alexander Roth; Alberto Santos; Kalliopi P Tsafou; Michael Kuhn; Peer Bork; Lars J Jensen; Christian von Mering
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  E2 regulates MMP-13 via targeting miR-140 in IL-1β-induced extracellular matrix degradation in human chondrocytes.

Authors:  Yujie Liang; Li Duan; Jianyi Xiong; Weiming Zhu; Qisong Liu; Daming Wang; Wei Liu; Zigang Li; Daping Wang
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Bioinformatics analysis of differentially expressed genes involved in human developmental chondrogenesis.

Authors:  Jian Zhou; Chenxi Li; Anqi Yu; Shuo Jie; Xiadong Du; Tang Liu; Wanchun Wang; Yingquan Luo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cross-Tissue Analysis Using Machine Learning to Identify Novel Biomarkers for Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Yudong Zhao; Yu Xia; Gaoyan Kuang; Jihui Cao; Fu Shen; Mingshuang Zhu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.809

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.