J S Williamson1, A J Quyn2, P M Sagar2. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK. 2. John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St James's Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The management of lateral pelvic lymphadenopathy in low rectal cancer poses an oncological and technical challenge. Interpretation of the literature is confounded by different approaches to management in the East and West, and a lack of randomized data from which to draw accurate conclusions regarding the optimal approach. Recent collaboration between Eastern and Western centres has increased the standardization of care. Despite this, significant differences in international guidelines remain. The aim of this review was to appraise the available literature and propose a management algorithm. METHODS: A literature review of all relevant studies was performed to summarize the historical evidence, as well as establish the significance of clinically positive lateral pelvic sidewall nodes, and the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and lateral pelvic node dissection. A management algorithm was developed based on this review of the literature. RESULTS: The management of pelvic sidewall lymphadenopathy in rectal cancer is non-standardized, with geographical differences. The mechanism of lateral lymphatic spread is well defined; the risk increases with lower tumour height and advanced T category. Existing data indicate that acceptable disease-free and overall survival can be achieved by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with selective lateral pelvic node dissection. CONCLUSION: Suspicious lateral pelvic sidewall nodes, particularly in the internal iliac chain, should be considered as resectable locoregional disease, and surgery offered for enlarged nodes that do not respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
BACKGROUND: The management of lateral pelvic lymphadenopathy in low rectal cancer poses an oncological and technical challenge. Interpretation of the literature is confounded by different approaches to management in the East and West, and a lack of randomized data from which to draw accurate conclusions regarding the optimal approach. Recent collaboration between Eastern and Western centres has increased the standardization of care. Despite this, significant differences in international guidelines remain. The aim of this review was to appraise the available literature and propose a management algorithm. METHODS: A literature review of all relevant studies was performed to summarize the historical evidence, as well as establish the significance of clinically positive lateral pelvic sidewall nodes, and the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and lateral pelvic node dissection. A management algorithm was developed based on this review of the literature. RESULTS: The management of pelvic sidewall lymphadenopathy in rectal cancer is non-standardized, with geographical differences. The mechanism of lateral lymphatic spread is well defined; the risk increases with lower tumour height and advanced T category. Existing data indicate that acceptable disease-free and overall survival can be achieved by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with selective lateral pelvic node dissection. CONCLUSION: Suspicious lateral pelvic sidewall nodes, particularly in the internal iliac chain, should be considered as resectable locoregional disease, and surgery offered for enlarged nodes that do not respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Authors: Tania C Sluckin; Sanne-Marije J A Hazen; Karin Horsthuis; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Corrie A M Marijnen; Pieter J Tanis; Miranda Kusters Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2022-10-20
Authors: Rosa M Jimenez-Rodriguez; Jonathan B Yuval; Charles-Etienne Gabriel Sauve; Isaac Wasserman; Piyush Aggarwal; Paul B Romesser; Christopher H Crane; Rona Yaeger; Andrea Cercek; Jose G Guillem; Martin R Weiser; Iris H Wei; Maria Widmar; Garrett M Nash; Emmanouil P Pappou; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Marc J Gollub; Philip B Paty; J Joshua Smith Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2021-07-22 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Michael K Turgeon; Adriana C Gamboa; Jessica M Keilson; Jeffrey Maniko; Lillias Maguire; Katherine Hrebinko; Jennifer Holder-Murray; Jason T Wiseman; Sherif Abdel-Misih; Saif Hamdan; Alexander T Hawkins; Philip Bauer; Matthew Silviera; Shishir K Maithel; Glen C Balch Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 2.885
Authors: Gabriele Anania; Richard Justin Davies; Alberto Arezzo; Francesco Bagolini; Vito D'Andrea; Luigina Graziosi; Salomone Di Saverio; Georgi Popivanov; Isaac Cheruiyot; Roberto Cirocchi; Annibale Donini Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2021-06-14 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Alexey Surov; Hans-Jonas Meyer; Maciej Pech; Maciej Powerski; Jasan Omari; Andreas Wienke Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 2.571