Literature DB >> 3277048

The genetic toxicity of human carcinogens and its implications.

M D Shelby1.   

Abstract

23 chemicals and chemical combinations have been designated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as causally associated with cancer in humans. The literature was searched for reports of their activity in the Salmonella mutagenicity assay and for evidence of their ability to induce chromosome aberrations or micronuclei in the bone marrow of mice or rats. In addition, the chemical structures of these carcinogens were assessed for the presence of electrophilic substituents that might be associated with their mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. The purpose of this study was to determine which human carcinogens exhibit genetic toxicity in vitro and in vivo and to what extent they can be detected using these two widely employed short-term tests for genetic toxicity. The results of this study revealed 20 of the 23 carcinogens to be active in one or both short-term tests. Treosulphan, for which short-term test results are not available, is predicted to be active based on its structure. The remaining two agents, asbestos and conjugated estrogens, are not mutagenic to Salmonella; asbestos is not likely to induce cytogenetic effects in the bone marrow and the potential activity of conjugated estrogens in the bone marrow is difficult to anticipate. These findings show that genetic toxicity is characteristic of the majority of IARC Group 1 human carcinogens. If these chemicals are considered representative of human carcinogens, then two short-term tests may serve as an effective primary screen for chemicals that present a carcinogenic hazard to humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3277048     DOI: 10.1016/0165-1218(88)90113-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  19 in total

1.  Resolution of anaphase bridges in cancer cells.

Authors:  Diane R Hoffelder; Li Luo; Nancy A Burke; Simon C Watkins; Susanne M Gollin; William S Saunders
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 2.  Utility of short-term tests for genetic toxicity.

Authors:  D M DeMarini; J Lewtas; H E Brockman
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.691

3.  Mechanisms of asbestos carcinogenesis and toxicity: the amphibole hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  B T Mossman
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1993-08

4.  Chemical contaminants and their effects in fish and wildlife from the industrial zone of Sumgayit, Republic of Azerbaijan.

Authors:  Carol D Swartz; K C Donnelly; Arif Islamzadeh; Gilbert T Rowe; William J Rogers; Grigoriy M Palatnikov; Arif A Mekhtiev; Rafik Kasimov; Thomas J McDonald; Jeffery K Wickliffe; Bobby J Presley; John W Bickham
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Genetic toxicity of a mixture of fifteen pesticides commonly found in the Italian diet.

Authors:  P Dolara; A Vezzani; G Caderni; C Coppi; F Torricelli
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 6.691

6.  Prevalence of genotoxic chemicals among animal and human carcinogens evaluated in the IARC Monograph Series.

Authors:  H Bartsch; C Malaveille
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.691

7.  Comparison of flow cytometry- and microscopy-based methods for measuring micronucleated reticulocyte frequencies in rodents treated with nongenotoxic and genotoxic chemicals.

Authors:  Kristine L Witt; Elizabeth Livanos; Grace E Kissling; Dorothea K Torous; William Caspary; Raymond R Tice; Leslie Recio
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 8.  The role of transgenic mouse models in carcinogen identification.

Authors:  John B Pritchard; John E French; Barbara J Davis; Joseph K Haseman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Estimating the extent of the health hazard posed by high-production volume chemicals.

Authors:  A R Cunningham; H S Rosenkranz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  New homozygous gpt delta transgenic rat strain improves an efficiency of the in vivo mutagenicity assay.

Authors:  Kenichi Masumura; Tomoko Ando; Akiko Ukai; Sho Fujiwara; Shigeo Yokose; Xinyue You; Takayoshi Suzuki; Hiroyuki Hayashi; Takehiko Nohmi; Hisayoshi Takagi; Masamitsu Honma
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2021-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.