Literature DB >> 2766027

Prevalence of genotoxic chemicals among animal and human carcinogens evaluated in the IARC Monograph Series.

H Bartsch1, C Malaveille.   

Abstract

To determine whether genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens contribute similarly to the cancer burden in humans, an analysis was performed on agents that were evaluated in Supplements 6 and 7 to the IARC Monographs for their carcinogenic effects in humans and animals and for the activity in short-term genotoxicity tests. The prevalence of genotoxic carcinogens on four groups of agents, consisting of established human carcinogens (group 1, n = 30), probable human carcinogens (group 2A, n = 37), possible human carcinogens (group 2B, n = 113) and on agents with limited evidence of carcinogenicity in animals (a subset of group 3, n = 149) was determined. A high prevalence in the order of 80 to 90% of genotoxic carcinogens was found in each of the groups 1, 2A and 2B, which were also shown to be multi-species/multi-tissues carcinogens. The distribution of carcinogenic potency in rodents did not reveal any specific characteristic of the human carcinogens in group 1 that would differentiate them from agents in groups 2A, 2B and 3. The results of this analysis indicate that (a) an agent with unknown carcinogenic potential showing sufficient evidence of activity in in vitro/in vivo genotoxicity assays (involving as endpoints DNA damage and chromosomal/mutational damage) may represent a hazard to humans; and b) an agent showing lack of activity in this spectrum of genotoxicity assays should undergo evaluation for carcinogenicity by rodent bioassay, in view of the present lack of validated short-term tests for non-genotoxic carcinogens. Overall, this analysis implies that genotoxic carcinogens add more to the cancer burden in man than non-genotoxic carcinogens. Thus, identification of such genotoxic carcinogens and subsequent lowering of exposure will remain the main goal for primary cancer prevention in man.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2766027     DOI: 10.1007/BF00122647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol        ISSN: 0742-2091            Impact factor:   6.691


  12 in total

Review 1.  Performance of short-term tests for detection of human carcinogens.

Authors:  T Kuroki; T Matsushima
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: an updating of IARC Monographs volumes 1 to 42.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum Suppl       Date:  1987

3.  Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity in rodents from in vitro genetic toxicity assays.

Authors:  R W Tennant; B H Margolin; M D Shelby; E Zeiger; J K Haseman; J Spalding; W Caspary; M Resnick; S Stasiewicz; B Anderson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Commentary on the status of short-term tests for chemical carcinogens.

Authors:  M D Shelby; E Zeiger; R W Tennant
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 5.  Utility of short-term tests for genetic toxicity in the aftermath of the NTP's analysis of 73 chemicals.

Authors:  H E Brockman; D M DeMarini
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 6.  The Salmonella typhimurium/mammalian microsomal assay. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.

Authors:  L D Kier; D J Brusick; A E Auletta; E S Von Halle; M M Brown; V F Simmon; V Dunkel; J McCann; K Mortelmans; L E Kier
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 7.  Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested in rodents by the U.S. NCI/NTP.

Authors:  J Ashby; R W Tennant
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 8.  The genetic toxicity of human carcinogens and its implications.

Authors:  M D Shelby
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Quantifying the carcinogenicity of antineoplastic drugs.

Authors:  J M Kaldor; N E Day; K Hemminki
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-04

10.  A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays.

Authors:  L S Gold; C B Sawyer; R Magaw; G M Backman; M de Veciana; R Levinson; N K Hooper; W R Havender; L Bernstein; R Peto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  5 in total

1.  Estimating the extent of the health hazard posed by high-production volume chemicals.

Authors:  A R Cunningham; H S Rosenkranz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.031

2.  Hazard identification: efficiency of short-term tests in identifying germ cell mutagens and putative nongenotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  M D Waters; H F Stack; M A Jackson; B A Bridges
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Are genotoxic carcinogens more potent than nongenotoxic carcinogens?

Authors:  S Parodi; D Malacarne; P Romano; M Taningher
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  A novel, integrated in vitro carcinogenicity test to identify genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens using human lymphoblastoid cells.

Authors:  Eleanor C Wilde; Katherine E Chapman; Leanne M Stannard; Anna L Seager; Katja Brüsehafer; Ume-Kulsoom Shah; James A Tonkin; M Rowan Brown; Jatin R Verma; Ann T Doherty; George E Johnson; Shareen H Doak; Gareth J S Jenkins
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 6.168

Review 5.  Human carcinogens so far identified.

Authors:  L Tomatis; A Aitio; J Wilbourn; L Shuker
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1989-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.