Literature DB >> 3276825

Prediction of long-term survival by flow cytometric analysis of cellular DNA content in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

M L Friedlander1, D W Hedley, C Swanson, P Russell.   

Abstract

The prognostic value of cellular DNA content in ovarian cancer (malignant common epithelial tumors) was investigated by flow cytometric analysis of paraffin-embedded tumor blocks from 128 previously untreated patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III and IV ovarian cancer entered in a prospective clinical trial of combination v sequential therapy with chlorambucil and cisplatin. Seventy-three percent of tumors were aneuploid and 27% were diploid. Multivariate analysis using a Cox model showed that cellular DNA content (P less than .001) and FIGO stage (P less than .02) were the only significant independent prognostic variables. The median survival was 13 months for patients with aneuploid tumors and 60 months for patients with diploid tumors (P less than .0001). Further analysis indicated that the good prognosis associated with diploid tumors was limited to patients with stage III disease, all patients with stage IV (spread beyond the peritoneal cavity or liver metastases) disease having a poor prognosis irrespective of ploidy. On pathological review, nine borderline ovarian tumors (of low malignant potential) were identified, and seven of these were diploid. These tumors have an unusually favorable prognosis, despite apparent dissemination within the peritoneal cavity, a paradox which is often difficult to explain using conventional histological criteria. Although the vast majority of tumors in this study (93%) were classified as invasive epithelial ovarian cancers, it is possible that some of the patients with stage III diploid tumors may have had malignancies that were predominantly of low malignant potential, thus accounting in part for the prognostic significance of DNA content. By incorporating flow cytometric DNA analysis with careful histopathological assessment, it may be possible to better identify patients with an inherently good prognosis. This assumes particular importance, as the relatively favorable prognosis of patients with stage III diploid ovarian tumors appears to be independent of the type of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3276825     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.2.282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  9 in total

1.  Value of quantitative pathological variables as prognostic factors in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  M Brinkhuis; J P Baak; G A Meijer; P J van Diest; O Mogensen; P Bichel; J P Neijt
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Comparison of image analysis and flow cytometric determination of cellular DNA content.

Authors:  C Cope; D Rowe; L Delbridge; J Philips; M Friedlander
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  DNA ploidy, nuclear size, proliferation index and DNA-hypomethylation in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Alain G Zeimet; Heidi Fiegl; Georg Goebel; Francis Kopp; Claude Allasia; Daniel Reimer; Ilona Steppan; Elisabeth Mueller-Holzner; Melanie Ehrlich; Christian Marth
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Assessment of proliferative activity in ovarian neoplasms by flow and static cytometry. Correlation with prognostic features.

Authors:  P C Huettner; D S Weinberg; J M Lage
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Multivariate analyses of DNA index, p62c-myc, and clinicopathological status of patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M Curling; S Stenning; C N Hudson; J V Watson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Phase II evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and debulking followed by intraperitoneal chemotherapy in women with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer: Southwest Oncology Group Study S0009.

Authors:  Amy D Tiersten; P Y Liu; Harriet O Smith; Sharon P Wilczynski; William R Robinson; Maurie Markman; David S Alberts
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Demonstration of somatic rearrangements and genomic heterogeneity in human ovarian cancer by DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  E M Boltz; P Harnett; J Leary; R Houghton; R F Kefford; M L Friedlander
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  DNA Cytometry and Nuclear Morphometry in Ovarian Benign, Borderline and Malignant Tumors.

Authors:  Amina A Gamal El Din; Manal A Badawi; Shereen E Abdel Aal; Nihad A Ibrahim; Fatma A Morsy; Nermeen M Shaffie
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-01

9.  Prognostic impact of chromosome aberrations in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  T Pejovic; A Himmelmann; S Heim; N Mandahl; U M Flodérus; S Furgyik; B Elmfors; G Helm; H Willén; F Mitelman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.