Literature DB >> 32767223

Sentinel Node Status is the Most Important Prognostic Information for Clinical Stage IIB and IIC Melanoma Patients.

Marcus Vitor Nunes Lindote1, Marcus Rodrigo Monteiro1, Eduardo Doria Filho2, Isabela Bartelli Fonseca1, Clovis Antonio Lopes Pinto3, Andrea Schiavinato Jafelicci4, Matheus de Melo Lôbo4, Vinicius Fernando Calsavara5, Eduardo Bertolli6, João Pedreira Duprat Neto4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for melanoma patients has been questioned. We aimed to study high-risk stage II melanoma patients who underwent SNB to determine what the prognostic factors regarding recurrence and mortality were, and evaluate how relevant SNB status is in this scenario.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of clinical stage IIB/IIC melanoma patients who underwent SNB from 2000 to 2015 in a single institution. Prognostic factors related to distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were assessed from multiple Cox regression. Relevant variables were used to create risk predictor nomograms for DRFS and MSS.
RESULTS: From 1213 SNB, 259 were performed for clinical stage IIB/IIC melanoma patients. SNB status was the most important variable for both endpoints. Patients with positive SNB presented median DRFS of 35.73 months (95% CI 21.38-50.08, SE 7.32) and median MSS of 66.4 months (95% CI 29.76-103.03, SE 18.69), meanwhile both median DRFS and MSS were not achieved for those with negative SNB (logrank < 0.0001). Both nomograms have been internally validated and presented adequate calibration (C-index was 0.734 for DRFS and 0.718 for MSS).
CONCLUSIONS: SNB status was the most important risk factor in our cohort of clinical stage IIB and IIC patients and, in conjunction with well-established primary tumor characteristics, should not be abandoned. Their use in prognosis for these patients remains extremely useful for daily practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32767223     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08959-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  33 in total

1.  A nomogram to identify high-risk melanoma patients with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Eduardo Bertolli; Mariana Petaccia de Macedo; Vinícius Fernando Calsavara; Clovis Antonio Lopes Pinto; João Pedreira Duprat Neto
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Time to reconsider the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma.

Authors:  Michael Bigby; Samuel Zagarella; Michael Sladden; Catalin M Popescu
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Outcome of Melanoma Patients Who Did Not Proceed to Sentinel Node Biopsy After Preoperative Lymphoscintigraphy.

Authors:  Norbertus A Ipenburg; Omgo E Nieweg; Roger F Uren; John F Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Management of Regional Lymph Nodes in Melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.

Authors:  Sandra L Wong; Mark B Faries; Erin B Kennedy; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Timothy J Akhurst; Charlotte Ariyan; Charles M Balch; Barry S Berman; Alistair Cochran; Keith A Delman; Mark Gorman; John M Kirkwood; Marc D Moncrieff; Jonathan S Zager; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma.

Authors:  D L Morton; D R Wen; J H Wong; J S Economou; L A Cagle; F K Storm; L J Foshag; A J Cochran
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-04

Review 6.  Sentinel node biopsy in melanoma: Current controversies addressed.

Authors:  M F Madu; M W J M Wouters; A C J van Akkooi
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Risk stratification of sentinel node-positive melanoma patients defines surgical management and adjuvant therapy treatment considerations.

Authors:  Daniëlle Verver; David van Klaveren; Alexander C J van Akkooi; Piotr Rutkowski; Barry W E M Powell; Caroline Robert; Alessandro Testori; Barbara L van Leeuwen; Astrid A M van der Veldt; Ulrich Keilholz; Alexander M M Eggermont; Cornelis Verhoef; Dirk J Grünhagen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  No survival benefit for patients with melanoma undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy: critical appraisal of the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial-I final report.

Authors:  M Sladden; S Zagarella; C Popescu; M Bigby
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  Final trial report of sentinel-node biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma.

Authors:  Donald L Morton; John F Thompson; Alistair J Cochran; Nicola Mozzillo; Omgo E Nieweg; Daniel F Roses; Harold J Hoekstra; Constantine P Karakousis; Christopher A Puleo; Brendon J Coventry; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; B Mark Smithers; Eberhard Paul; William G Kraybill; J Gregory McKinnon; He-Jing Wang; Robert Elashoff; Mark B Faries
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Validation of a Nomogram for Non-sentinel Node Positivity in Melanoma Patients, and Its Clinical Implications: A Brazilian-Dutch Study.

Authors:  Eduardo Bertolli; Viola Franke; Vinicius Fernando Calsavara; Mariana Petaccia de Macedo; Clovis Antonio Lopes Pinto; Winan J van Houdt; Michel W J M Wouters; Joao Pedreira Duprat Neto; Alexander C J van Akkooi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Follow-up of primary melanoma patients with high risk of recurrence: recommendations based on evidence and consensus.

Authors:  Begoña Campos-Balea; Ovidio Fernández-Calvo; Roberto García-Figueiras; Carlos Neira; Carmen Peña-Penabad; Carmela Rodríguez-López; Rocío Vílchez-Simo; María Quindós-Varela
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.340

Review 2.  Reprogramming of sentinel lymph node microenvironment during tumor metastasis.

Authors:  Yen-Liang Li; Wen-Chun Hung
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 12.771

3.  Improved cutaneous melanoma survival stratification through integration of 31-gene expression profile testing with the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Staging.

Authors:  Oliver J Wisco; Justin W Marson; Graham H Litchman; Nicholas Brownstone; Kyle R Covington; Brian J Martin; Ann P Quick; Jennifer J Siegel; Hillary G Caruso; Robert W Cook; Richard R Winkelmann; Darrell S Rigel
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.