Joel M Baumgartner1, Paul Riviere2, Richard B Lanman3, Kaitlyn J Kelly4, Jula Veerapong4, Andrew M Lowy4, Razelle Kurzrock2. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. j1baumgartner@ucsd.edu. 2. Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 3. Guardant Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising technology for treatment selection, prognostication, and surveillance after definitive therapy. Its use in the perioperative setting for patients with metastatic disease has not been well studied. We characterize perioperative plasma ctDNA and its association with progression-free survival (PFS) in patients undergoing surgery for peritoneal metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited 71 patients undergoing surgery for peritoneal metastases and evaluated their plasma with a targeted 73-gene ctDNA next-generation sequencing test before and after surgery. The association between perioperative ctDNA, as well as other patient factors, and PFS was evaluated by Cox regression. RESULTS: ctDNA was detectable in 28 patients (39.4%) preoperatively and in 37 patients (52.1%) postoperatively. Patients with high ctDNA [maximum somatic variant allele fraction (MSVAF) > 0.25%] had worse PFS than those with low MSVAF (< 0.25%) in both the pre- and postoperative settings (median 4.8 vs. 19.3 months, p < 0.001, and 9.2 vs.15.0 months, p = 0.049, respectively; log-rank test). On multivariate analysis, high-grade histology [hazard ratio (HR) 3.42, p = 0.001], incomplete resection (HR 2.35, p = 0.010), and high preoperative MSVAF (HR 3.04, p = 0.001) were associated with worse PFS. Patients with new postoperative alterations in the context of preoperative alteration(s) also had a significantly shorter PFS compared with other groups (HR 4.28, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High levels of perioperative ctDNA and new postoperative ctDNA alterations in the context of preoperative alterations predict worse outcomes in patients undergoing resection for peritoneal metastases. This may highlight a role for longitudinal ctDNA surveillance in this population.
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising technology for treatment selection, prognostication, and surveillance after definitive therapy. Its use in the perioperative setting for patients with metastatic disease has not been well studied. We characterize perioperative plasma ctDNA and its association with progression-free survival (PFS) in patients undergoing surgery for peritoneal metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited 71 patients undergoing surgery for peritoneal metastases and evaluated their plasma with a targeted 73-gene ctDNA next-generation sequencing test before and after surgery. The association between perioperative ctDNA, as well as other patient factors, and PFS was evaluated by Cox regression. RESULTS: ctDNA was detectable in 28 patients (39.4%) preoperatively and in 37 patients (52.1%) postoperatively. Patients with high ctDNA [maximum somatic variant allele fraction (MSVAF) > 0.25%] had worse PFS than those with low MSVAF (< 0.25%) in both the pre- and postoperative settings (median 4.8 vs. 19.3 months, p < 0.001, and 9.2 vs.15.0 months, p = 0.049, respectively; log-rank test). On multivariate analysis, high-grade histology [hazard ratio (HR) 3.42, p = 0.001], incomplete resection (HR 2.35, p = 0.010), and high preoperative MSVAF (HR 3.04, p = 0.001) were associated with worse PFS. Patients with new postoperative alterations in the context of preoperative alteration(s) also had a significantly shorter PFS compared with other groups (HR 4.28, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High levels of perioperative ctDNA and new postoperative ctDNA alterations in the context of preoperative alterations predict worse outcomes in patients undergoing resection for peritoneal metastases. This may highlight a role for longitudinal ctDNA surveillance in this population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer prognostication; Cancer surveillance; Liquid biopsy
Authors: Steven B Maron; Leah M Chase; Samantha Lomnicki; Sara Kochanny; Kelly L Moore; Smita S Joshi; Stacie Landron; Julie Johnson; Lesli A Kiedrowski; Rebecca J Nagy; Richard B Lanman; Seung Tae Kim; Jeeyun Lee; Daniel V T Catenacci Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Paul Riviere; Paul T Fanta; Sadakatsu Ikeda; Joel Baumgartner; Gregory M Heestand; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Joel M Baumgartner; Victoria M Raymond; Richard B Lanman; Lisa Tran; Kaitlyn J Kelly; Andrew M Lowy; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Jane Goodall; Joaquin Mateo; Wei Yuan; Helen Mossop; Nuria Porta; Susana Miranda; Raquel Perez-Lopez; David Dolling; Dan R Robinson; Shahneen Sandhu; Gemma Fowler; Berni Ebbs; Penny Flohr; George Seed; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Gunther Boysen; Claudia Bertan; Mark Atkin; Matthew Clarke; Mateus Crespo; Ines Figueiredo; Ruth Riisnaes; Semini Sumanasuriya; Pasquale Rescigno; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Adam Sharp; Nina Tunariu; Diletta Bianchini; Alexa Gillman; Christopher J Lord; Emma Hall; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Suzanne Carreira; Johann S de Bono Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Justin I Odegaard; John J Vincent; Stefanie Mortimer; James V Vowles; Bryan C Ulrich; Kimberly C Banks; Stephen R Fairclough; Oliver A Zill; Marcin Sikora; Reza Mokhtari; Diana Abdueva; Rebecca J Nagy; Christine E Lee; Lesli A Kiedrowski; Cloud P Paweletz; Helmy Eltoukhy; Richard B Lanman; Darya I Chudova; AmirAli Talasaz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kevin M Turner; Mackenzie C Morris; Davendra Sohal; Jeffrey J Sussman; Gregory C Wilson; Syed A Ahmad; Sameer H Patel Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Andi Flory; Kristina M Kruglyak; John A Tynan; Lisa M McLennan; Jill M Rafalko; Patrick Christian Fiaux; Gilberto E Hernandez; Francesco Marass; Prachi Nakashe; Carlos A Ruiz-Perez; Donna M Fath; Thuy Jennings; Rita Motalli-Pepio; Kate Wotrang; Angela L McCleary-Wheeler; Susan Lana; Brenda Phillips; Brian K Flesner; Nicole F Leibman; Tracy LaDue; Chelsea D Tripp; Brenda L Coomber; J Paul Woods; Mairin Miller; Sean W Aiken; Amber Wolf-Ringwall; Antonella Borgatti; Kathleen Kraska; Christopher B Thomson; Alane Kosanovich Cahalane; Rebecca L Murray; William C Kisseberth; Maria A Camps-Palau; Franck Floch; Claire Beaudu-Lange; Aurélia Klajer-Peres; Olivier Keravel; Luc-André Fribourg-Blanc; Pascale Chicha Mazetier; Angelo Marco; Molly B McLeod; Erin Portillo; Terry S Clark; Scott Judd; C Kirk Feinberg; Marie Benitez; Candace Runyan; Lindsey Hackett; Scott Lafey; Danielle Richardson; Sarah Vineyard; Mary Tefend Campbell; Nilesh Dharajiya; Taylor J Jensen; Dirk van den Boom; Luis A Diaz; Daniel S Grosu; Arthur Polk; Kalle Marsal; Susan Cho Hicks; Katherine M Lytle; Lauren Holtvoigt; Jason Chibuk; Ilya Chorny; Dana W Y Tsui Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 3.752