| Literature DB >> 28450425 |
Jane Goodall1, Joaquin Mateo1,2, Wei Yuan1, Helen Mossop1, Nuria Porta1, Susana Miranda1, Raquel Perez-Lopez1,2, David Dolling1, Dan R Robinson3, Shahneen Sandhu4, Gemma Fowler1, Berni Ebbs1, Penny Flohr1, George Seed1, Daniel Nava Rodrigues1,2, Gunther Boysen1, Claudia Bertan1, Mark Atkin1, Matthew Clarke1, Mateus Crespo1, Ines Figueiredo1, Ruth Riisnaes1, Semini Sumanasuriya1,2, Pasquale Rescigno1,2, Zafeiris Zafeiriou1,2, Adam Sharp1,2, Nina Tunariu1,2, Diletta Bianchini1,2, Alexa Gillman1, Christopher J Lord1, Emma Hall1, Arul M Chinnaiyan3, Suzanne Carreira1, Johann S de Bono5,2.
Abstract
Biomarkers for more precise patient care are needed in metastatic prostate cancer. We have reported a phase II trial (TOPARP-A) of the PARP inhibitor olaparib in metastatic prostate cancer, demonstrating antitumor activity associating with homologous recombination DNA repair defects. We now report targeted and whole-exome sequencing of serial circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples collected during this trial. Decreases in cfDNA concentration independently associated with outcome in multivariable analyses (HR for overall survival at week 8: 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.56; P = 0.003). All tumor tissue somatic DNA repair mutations were detectable in cfDNA; allele frequency of somatic mutations decreased selectively in responding patients (χ2P < 0.001). At disease progression, following response to olaparib, multiple subclonal aberrations reverting germline and somatic DNA repair mutations (BRCA2, PALB2) back in frame emerged as mechanisms of resistance. These data support the role of liquid biopsies as a predictive, prognostic, response, and resistance biomarker in metastatic prostate cancer.Significance: We report prospectively planned, serial, cfDNA analyses from patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated on an investigator-initiated phase II trial of olaparib. These analyses provide predictive, prognostic, response, and resistance data with "second hit" mutations first detectable at disease progression, suggesting clonal evolution from treatment-selective pressure and platinum resistance. Cancer Discov; 7(9); 1006-17. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Domchek, p. 937See related article by Kondrashova et al., p. 984See related article by Quigley et al., p. 999This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 920. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28450425 PMCID: PMC6143169 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0261
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Discov ISSN: 2159-8274 Impact factor: 39.397