Literature DB >> 32764866

Binocular Visual Function in a Pre-Presbyopic Patient with Uniocular Cataract Undergoing Cataract Surgery with a Multifocal Intraocular Lens.

Laura J Wood1,2, Jasleen K Jolly1,2, Markus Groppe3, Larry Benjamin3, James F Kirwan4, Nishal Patel5, Mostafa A Elgohary6, Robert E MacLaren1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: An increasing number of pre-presbyopic patients are undergoing uniocular cataract extraction. We aim to compare the binocular status of subjects with uniocular cataracts, implanted either with a multifocal or a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were recruited from outpatient ophthalmology clinics and randomized to an IOL type. Corrected and uncorrected LogMAR distance visual acuity (VA) and near and intermediate VA using the Radner reading test were completed. The binocular tests included the Worth Four Dot Test, fixation disparity, TNO stereoacuity and foveal suppression assessment. In addition to the near activity vision questionnaire. The trial was closed early because the chosen multifocal lens had been superseded by newer models. We report two subjects, one receiving the multifocal IOL and a monofocal IOL control with the most comparable baseline characteristics.
RESULTS: Both subjects experienced uncomplicated cataract surgery, showing clinically significant improved corrected distance VA, 0.06 LogMAR and -0.16 LogMAR in the monofocal and multifocal IOL, respectively. The multifocal subject had 30 seconds of arc stereoacuity indicating normal binocular vision. Only gross binocular single vision with no stereopsis was found in the monofocal IOL subject. The latter subject also had reduced near vision quality-of-life questionnaire results.
CONCLUSION: This two-patient case series demonstrates greater binocular near ability, with the multifocal IOL, in the pre-presbyopic patient undergoing uniocular cataract surgery. The case series highlights the need, and methodology for investigating further the functional and quality-of-life benefits of implanting multifocal IOLs in pre-presbyopic patients, those in their twenties and thirties, undergoing uniocular cataract surgery.
© 2020 Wood et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accommodation; binocular vision; cataracts; multifocal intraocular lens; pseudophakia

Year:  2020        PMID: 32764866      PMCID: PMC7371563          DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S254532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1177-5467


  22 in total

1.  Development of a questionnaire to assess the relative subjective benefits of presbyopia correction.

Authors:  Phillip J Buckhurst; James S Wolffsohn; Navneet Gupta; Shehzad A Naroo; Leon N Davies; Sunil Shah
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Association between visual impairment and patient-reported visual disability at different stages of cataract surgery.

Authors:  E Ruthy Acosta-Rojas; Mercè Comas; Maria Sala; Xavier Castells
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.648

3.  Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens.

Authors:  Rita Mencucci; Eleonora Favuzza; Orsola Caporossi; Alfonso Savastano; Stanislao Rizzo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The Near Mallett Unit Foveal Suppression Test: a cross-sectional study to establish test norms and relationship with other optometric tests.

Authors:  Sosena T W Tang; Bruce J W Evans
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.

Authors:  Samantha R de Silva; Jennifer R Evans; Varo Kirthi; Mohammed Ziaei; Martin Leyland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-12

6.  Impact of differences between eyes on binocular measures of vision in patients with cataracts.

Authors:  M Comas; X Castells; E R Acosta; J Tuñí
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Number of People Blind or Visually Impaired by Cataract Worldwide and in World Regions, 1990 to 2010.

Authors:  Moncef Khairallah; Rim Kahloun; Rupert Bourne; Hans Limburg; Seth R Flaxman; Jost B Jonas; Jill Keeffe; Janet Leasher; Kovin Naidoo; Konrad Pesudovs; Holly Price; Richard A White; Tien Y Wong; Serge Resnikoff; Hugh R Taylor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Visual performance of a new bi-aspheric, segmented, asymmetric multifocal IOL.

Authors:  Emma J Berrow; James S Wolffsohn; Paramdeep S Bilkhu; Sandeep Dhallu
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis.

Authors:  Kathleen Vancleef; Jenny C A Read; William Herbert; Nicola Goodship; Maeve Woodhouse; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Beneficial effects on vision in patients undergoing retinal gene therapy for choroideremia.

Authors:  Kanmin Xue; Jasleen K Jolly; Alun R Barnard; Anna Rudenko; Anna P Salvetti; Maria I Patrício; Thomas L Edwards; Markus Groppe; Harry O Orlans; Tanya Tolmachova; Graeme C Black; Andrew R Webster; Andrew J Lotery; Graham E Holder; Susan M Downes; Miguel C Seabra; Robert E MacLaren
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 53.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.